Coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: Role of contrast echocardiography

  • Antonio F. Amico
  • Sabino Iliceto
  • Richard S. Meltzer
  • Gaetano D’Ambrosio
  • Vito Marangelli
  • Cataldo Memmola
  • Giulia De Martino
  • Lucia Sublimi Saponetti
  • Paolo Rizzon
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 113)

Abstract

Coronary stenoses reduce coronary flow and, consequently, myocardial perfusion. This is the main cause of clinical symptoms of coronary artery disease. Though coronary arteriography is the most important diagnostic examination for evaluating this disease, it does have several limitations. It cannot, for example, estimate the actual ‘haemodynamic’ severity of the coronary stenoses and, therefore, its real significance in limiting myocardial perfusion. Interpretation of coronary angiograms is also affected by an intra- and inter-observer variability which cannot be overlooked [1, 2]. Furthermore, coronary arteriography as performed in most institutions gives only qualitative information on the distribution and characteristics of coronary stenoses. Myocardial perfusion is further influenced by many other factors which cannot be evaluated by coronary angiography (the microcirculation, heart muscle conditions, interstitial characteristics, wall stress, collateral circulation etc.).

Keywords

Myocardial Perfusion Papillary Muscle Collateral Circulation Interventricular Septum Contrast Echocardiography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW (1976) Interobserver variabil¬ity in coronary angiography. Circulation 53: 627–632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Rouen TA, Murray J A, Owen W (1977) Variability in the analysis of coronary arterio-grams. Circulation 55: 324–328.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levine RA, Teichholz LE, Goldman ME, Steinmetz MY, Baker M, Meltzer RS (1984) Microbubbles have intracardiac velocities similar to those of red blood cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 28–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armstrong WF, Mueller TM, Kinney EL, Thickner EG, Dillon JC, Feigenbaum H (1982) Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities with contrast enhanced two-dimen¬sional echocardiography. Circulation 66: 166–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tei C, Sakamaki T, Shah PM, Meerbaum S, Shimoura K, Kondo S, Corday E (1983) Myo-cardial contrast echocardiography: Reproducible technique of myocardial opacification for identifying regional perfusion deficits. Circulation 67: 585–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kemper AJ, O’Boyle JE, Sharma S, Cohen CA, Kloner RA, Khuri SF, Parisi AF (1983) Hydrogen peroxide contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography: Real-time in vivo delineation of regional myocardial perfusion. Circulation 68: 603 - 611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakamaki T, Tei C, Meerbaum S, Shimoura K, Kondo S, Fishbein MC, Y-Rit J, Shah PM, Corday E (1984) Verification of myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography assessment of perfusion defects in ischemic myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 34–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Armstrong WF, West SR, Dillon JC, Feigenbaum H (1984) Assessment of location and size of myocardial infarction with contrast enhanced echocardiography. II. Application of digi¬tal imaging techniques. J Am Coll Card 4: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore CA, Smucker LM, Kaul S (1986) Myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans. I. Safety - A comparison with routine coronary arteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol 8: 1066– 1072.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santoso T, Roelandt J, Mansyoer H, Abdurahaman N, Meltzer RS (1985) Myocardial per-fusion imaging in humans by contrast echocardiography using polygelin colloid solution. J Am Coll Cardiol 6: 612–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gillam LD, Kaul S, Fallon JT, Levine RA, Hedley-White ET, Guerrero JL, Weyman AE (1985) Functional and pathologic effects of multiple echocardiographic contrast injections on the myocardium, brain and kidney. J Am Coll Cardiol 6: 687–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lang RM, Borow KM, Neumann A, Feinstein SB (1987) Echocardiographic contrast agents: Effects of microbubbles and carrier solutions on left ventricular contractility. J Am Coll Cardiol 9: 910–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shapiro JR, Xie F, Meltzer RS (1988) Myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography: Dose-myocardial effect relations of intracoronary microbubbles. J Am Coll Cardiol 12: 765–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feinstein SB, Lang RM, Dick C, Neumann A, Al-Sadir J, Chua KG, Carroll J, Feldman T, Borow KM (1988) Contrast echocardiography during coronary arteriography in humans: Perfusion and anatomic studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 11: 59–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffin B, Timmis AD, Sowton E (1987) Contrast perfusion echocardiography: Distribution and reproducibility of myocardial contrast enhancement in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 60: 538–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldman ME, Mindich BP (1984) Intraoperative cardioplegic contrast echocardiography for assessing myocardial perfusion during open heart surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 4: 1029–1034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Griffin B, Timmis AB, Henderson RA, Sowton E (1987) Contrast perfusion echocardiography: Identification of area at risk of dyskinesia during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 114: 497–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Widimsky P, Cornel JH, Ten Cate FJ (1988) Evaluation of collateral blood flow by myocardial contrast enhanced echocardiography. Br Heart J 59: 20–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Braunwald E, Rutherford JD (1986) Reversible ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: Evidence for ‘hybernating myocardium’. J Am Coll Cardiol 6: 1467–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio F. Amico
  • Sabino Iliceto
  • Richard S. Meltzer
  • Gaetano D’Ambrosio
  • Vito Marangelli
  • Cataldo Memmola
  • Giulia De Martino
  • Lucia Sublimi Saponetti
  • Paolo Rizzon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations