Advertisement

Sunflower Transformation: A Study of Selectable Markers

  • A. E. Escandon
  • G. Hahne
Part of the Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture book series (PSBA, volume 8)

Abstract

The overall utility of a transformation protocol depends to a large extent on the efficiency of the selection step. In the work presented here, we evaluated three selectable markers (kanamycin, paromomycin, and phosphinotricin) for their performance in sunflower transformation experiments, using hypocotyl expiants of three inbred lines and one hybrid. The assays were performed on several culture media currently in use for sunflower tissues.

The different sunflower genotypes showed a differential sensitivity depending on marker and medium used. Kanamycin did not show a significant inhibitory effect, while paromomycin and phosphinotricin proved to be efficient selective agents. More detailed studies revealed that the sensitivity towards a selectable marker is strongly influenced by factors such as the N-sources contained in the medium, as well as its hormonal balance.

Keywords

Glutamine Synthetase Gibberellic Acid Selectable Marker Casein Hydrolysate Helianthus Annuus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Block, M., Botterman, J., Vanderwiele, M., Dockx, J., Thoen, C., Goessele, V., Mowa, N.R., Thompson, C., Van Montagu, M., and Leemans, J. (1987) ‘Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme’, EMBO J. 6, 2513 – 2518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dekeyser, R.* Claes, B., Manchal, M., Van Montagu, M., and Caplan, A. (1989) ‘Evaluation of selectable markers for rice transformation’, Plant Physiol. 90, 217–223,Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De La Haba P., Agüera, E., and Maldonado, J.M. (1988) ‘Development of nitrogen- assimilating enzymes in sunflower cotyledons during germination as affected by the exogeneous nitrogen source’, Planta 173, 52 – 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Everett N.P., Robinson, K.E.P., and Mascarenhas, D. (1987) ‘Genetic engineering of sunflower (Helianthus annum L.)’, Bio/Technol. 5, 1201 – 1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hain R., Stabel, P., Czernilofsky, A.P., Steinbiss, H.H., Herrera-Estrella, L., and Schell, J. (1985) ‘Uptake, integration, expression, and genetic transmission of a selectable chimaeric gene by plant protoplasts’, Mol. Gen. Genet. 199, 161 – 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartmann C.L., Donald, P.A., Secor, G.A., and Miller, J.F. (1988) ‘Sunflower tissue culture and its use in selection for resistance toPhoma macdonaldiiand white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum)’, Proc. 12th Int. Sunflower Conference, Vol. H, Int. Sunflower Assoc. (ed.), Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, pp. 347 – 351.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hauptmann, R.M., Vasil, V., Ozias-Akins, P., Tabaeizadeh, Z., Rogers, S.G., Fraley, R.T., Horsch, R.B., and Vasil, I.K. (1988) ‘Evaluation of selectable markers for obtaining stable transformants in the Gramineae’, Plant Physiol. 86, 602 – 606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horsch, R.B., Fry, J.E., Hoffmann, N.L., Eichholz, D., Rogers, S.G., and Fraley, R.T. (1985) ‘A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants’, Science 227, 1229 – 1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lenée, P., and Chupeau, Y. (1989) ‘Development of nitorgen assimilating enzymes during growth of cells derived from protoplasts of sunflower and tobacco’, Plant Sci. 59, 109 – 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 1O.
    McDonnell, R.E., Clark, R.D., Smith, W.A., and Hinchee, M.A. (1987) ‘A simplified method for the detection of neomycin phosphotransferase II activity in transformed plant tissue’, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5, 380 – 386.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. (1962) ‘A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures’, Physiol. Plant. 15, 473 – 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Negrutiu, I., Jacobs, M., and Cattoir-Reynaerts, A. (1984) ‘Progress in cellular engineering of plants: biochemical and genetic assessment of selectable markers from cultured cells’, Plant Mol. Biol. 3, 289 – 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paterson, K.E., and Everett, N.P. (1985) ‘Regeneration of Helianthus annuus inbred plants from callus’, Plant Sci. 42, 125 – 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajasekhar, V.K., and Oelmüller, R. (1987) ‘Regulation of induction of nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase in higher plants’, Physiol. Plant. 71, 517 – 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thompson C.J., Mowa, N.R., Tizard, R., Crameri, R., Davies, J.E., Lauwereys, M., and Botterman, J. (1987) ‘Characterization of the herbicide resisrance gene bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus’, EMBO J. 6, 2519–2523.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Towill L.E., and Mazur, P. (1975) ‘Studies on the reduction of 2,3,5- triphenyl tetrazolium chloride as a viability assay for plant tissue cultures’, Can. J. Bot. 53, 1097 – 1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilcox McCann A., Cooley, G., and Van Dreser, J. (1988) ‘A system for routine plantlet regeneration of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) from immature embryo-derived callus’, Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 14, 103 – 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. E. Escandon
    • 1
  • G. Hahne
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRSUniversité Louis PasteurStrasbourg CédexFrance

Personalised recommendations