Advertisement

Changes in Cognitive and Value Orientations in System Design

  • Ladislav Tondl
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy and Technology book series (PHTE, volume 7)

Abstract

The phrase, “cognitive and value orientations,” when applied to technology, presupposes that a technological system is a materialization or instantiation of a set of cognitive features and a set of valuations. Discussions dealing with the explanation of technological change commonly point out the role of value orientations and the significance of decision making as influenced by accepted values. Discussions of new cognitive orientations in technology generally call for an interdisciplinary approach involving the dynamics of behavior, spatial and temporal impacts, and prognoses with respect to the preparation for, the planning of, and the design of particular technological processes. New approaches in value orientations postulate that technical and humanitarian rationales can be combined; people speak of “human dimensions” or of the “controllability” or “manageability” or “acceptability” of technologies, or else they talk about solving “ergonomic” or “ecological” problems associated with technology. This essay is an attempt to clarify these changes.

Keywords

Technological Change Technological Project Technical Innovation Technical Discipline Cognitive Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boese, P., R. Gutsch et al., Planungsfaktor Umweltschutz (Grafenau: Lexika Verlag, 1976). In German.Google Scholar
  2. Entwurf für eine Richtlinie, “Empfehlungen zur Technikbewertung,” in W. Bungard and H. Lenk, eds., Technikbewertung ( Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988 ). In German.Google Scholar
  3. Gasparski, W. Projektowanie: Koncepcyjne Przygotowanie Dzialan (Warsaw: PWN, 1978). In Polish.Google Scholar
  4. Gorokhov, V. Metodologicheskij Analiz Sistemotekhniki (Moscow: Izd. Radio i Svjaz, 1982). In Russian.Google Scholar
  5. Hüning, A. “Zentrale Werte im technischen Handeln,” in H. Marhenkel and W. König, eds., Technikbewertung, Wärmepumpe (Düsseldorf, 1985), pp. 7–15. In German.Google Scholar
  6. Pejsa, J. “Explanation of Technological Changes and the Question of Efficiency of Technological Changes”Design Methods and Theories 20: 4 (1986): 519–531.Google Scholar
  7. Tondl, L. Scientific Procedures ( Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  8. Tondl, L. “Some Methods of Information Evaluation of Scientific Results,” Computers and Artificial Intelligence 5 (1986a): 385–394.Google Scholar
  9. Tondl, L. “Classical Explanation and the Explanation of Technological Changes,” Design Methods and Theories 20: 4 (1986b): 506–518.Google Scholar
  10. Tondl, L. “Nova Paradigmata Projektowani a Funkce CAD,” in Proceedings of ICCADI 87 Conference (Karlovy Vary, 1987a). In Czech.Google Scholar
  11. Tondl, L. “Explaining Technological Changes and the Paradigms in Technology Design,” in Proceedings of the VIIIth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Moscow, 1987b ).Google Scholar
  12. Tondl, L., and J. Pejsa. “Metodologicheskie Aspekty Sistemnogo Projektirovanija,” Voprosy Filosofii (1987), No. 2, pp. 87–96. In Russian.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ladislav Tondl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations