Defeasible Specification of Utilities

  • Ronald Loui
Part of the Studies in Cognitive Systems book series (COGS, volume 5)

Abstract

Decision analysis is the leading candidate for deciding among competing actions and conflicting goals in uncertain worlds. It is normally thought to require probabilities, utilities, and a set of alternative courses of action. Presumably, work on evidential reasoning will deliver probabilities suitable for AI’s use, and planning has already discovered various ways of representing and composing sequences of primitive actions. This leaves the specification of utilities of outcome states.

Keywords

Decision Theory Small World Primitive Action Defeasible Reasoning Classical Axiom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Charniak, E. and McDermott, D. Introduction to AI, Addison-Wesley, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Harman, G. Change in View, MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. Jeffrey, R. The Logic of Decision, Chicago University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  4. Loui, R. “A system of defeasible inference,” Computational Intelligence 3, 3, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Quine, W. V. O. From a Logical Point of View, Harvard, 1953.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Savage, L. The Foundations of Statistics, Dover, 1954.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Simon, H. The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Loui

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations