Wind Fields and Surface Fluxes

  • D. Offiler
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 298)


The European Space Agency’s ERS-1 satellite will carry several active radar instruments, one of which — the AMI scatterometer — will be used to derive surface wind fields. This paper describes how this instrument works, and how the winds are to be extracted from the radar data during ground processing. Plans to calibrate the satellite product, and to validate it during its lifetime will be outlined. Finally, the use to be made of these data, and derived parameters, such as surface fluxes, will be given.


Wind Speed Surface Wind Latent Heat Flux Surface Flux European Space Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    TW Harrold. Ground clutter observed in the Dee weather radar project. Meteorological Magazine. 103:140–141, 1974Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K Krishen. Correlation of radar backscattering cross sections with ocean wave height and wind velocity. Journal of Geophysical Research. 76:6528–6539, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    W Jones and LC Schroeder. Radar backscatter from the ocean: dependence on surface friction velocity. Boundary Layer Meteorology. 13:133–149, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    AE Long. Towards a C-band radar sea echo model for the ERS-1 scatterometer. In Proceedings of First ISPRS Colloquium on Spectral Signatures in Remote Sensing, Les Arcs, France, December 1985. pages 29–34, ESA SP-247, 1986Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    PM Woiceshyn et al. The necessity for a new parameterization of an empirical model for wind/ocean scatterometry. Journal of Geophysical Research. 91(C2):2273–2288, February 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    RE Glazman. Wind-fetch dependence of Seasat scatterometer measurements. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 8(11):1641–1647, November 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D Offiler. A comparison of SEASAT scatterometer-derived winds with JASIN surface winds. International Journal of Remote Sensing 5(2):365–378, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D Offiler. ERS-1 surface wind ambiguity removal by means of objective processing and subjective human intervention. July 1985. Final report to ESA Contract No. 6154/85/NL/BI.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    F Delsol and E Hellsten. ERS-1 surface wind ambiguity removal by objective techniques. 1985. Final Report to ESA Contract No. 6156/84/NL/BI.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    KJ Schwenzfeger. Algorithm for wind scatterometer data analysis ambiguity suppression. In The Use of Satellite Data in Climate Models, 10–12 June 1985, Alpbach, Austria. pages 35–36, ESA SP-244, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    ESA. Radar backscattering in the tropical rain forest. Earth Observation Quarterly, (21):6–7, March 1988. ESA Publications, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    AE Long, D Offiler, and T Wolff. Report of the Scatterometer Algorithm Development (SAD) Group. April 1984. ESA report ref. SAD01.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    PE Francis. The use of numerical wind and wave models to provide areal and temporal extensions to instrumental calibration and validation of remotely sensed data. In ERS- 1 Wind and Wave Calibration Workshop, Schliersee, FRG, 2–6 June 1986, pages 53–55, ESA SP-262, September 1986 pages 53–55, ESA SP-262, September 1986Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    E Attema. Airborne and tower-based scatterometry during the PROMESS and TOSCANE-T campaigns. In Proceedings of First ISPRS Colloquium on Spectral Signatures in Remote SensingLes Arcs, France, December 1985, ESA SP-247, 1986Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    CJ Readings. The use of aircraft to study the atmosphere: the Hercules of the Meteorological Research Flight. Meteorological Magazine. 114:66–77, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    RA Brown. On a satellite scatterometer as an anemometer. Journal of Geophysical Research. 88(C3):1663–1673, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    NASA. JASIN workshop report: Vol 1, Findings and conclusions. Technical Report no. 80–62, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    DG Duffy and R Atlas. The impact of Seasat-A scatterometer data on the numerical prediction of the Queen Elizabeth II storm. Journal of Geophysical Research. 91(C2):2241–2248, February 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S Nicholls. Measurements of turbulence by an instrumented aircraft in a convective boundary layer over the sea. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 104:653–676, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    WG Large and S Pond. Sensible and latent heat flux measurements over the ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 12:464–482, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    TH Guymer et al. Transfer processes at the air-sea interface. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.. 308:253–373, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    WJ Pierson. Verification procedures for the SEA SAT measurements of the wind vector with the SASS. Technical Report, Cuny Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, City College, New York, 1978. Report to JPL Contract 954411.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    I Halberstam. Some considerations in the evaluation of SEASAT-A satellite scatterometer (SASS) measurements. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 10:623–632, April 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    PK Taylor. The determination of surface fluxes of heat and water by satellite microwave radiometry and in situ measurements. In C Gautier and M Fieux, editors, Large Scale Oceanographic Experiments and Satellites. pages 223–246, D Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    WT Liu. Estimation of latent heat flux with Seasat-SMMR, a case study in the N. Atlantic. In C Gautier and M Fieux, editors, Large Scale Oceanographic Experiments and Satellites, pages 205–221, D Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Offiler
    • 1
  1. 1.Meteorological OfficeBracknellUK

Personalised recommendations