Skip to main content

Preclinical evaluation and phase I trials

  • Chapter
The Search for New Anticancer Drugs

Part of the book series: Cancer Biology and Medicine ((CABM,volume 3))

Abstract

The discovery of new anticancer agents has occurred, variously, by a mixture of screening, analogue development, rational design and serendipity. Until quite recently, the majority of potential new agents were tested initially in vivo in mice against rapidly growing leukaemias, such as the P388 and L1210. However, experience with the National Cancer Institute, USA (NCI) in vivo tumour panel as a screening tool has been relatively disappointing because the majority of agents thus identified are inactive against slowly growing solid tumours1. The major challenge for the development of new treatments for cancer is to identify new agents with activity against the common solid tumours, such as colon and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This has led to the establishment at NCI of an in vitro testing system based on human tumour cell lines2. While the predictive ability of this model is unknown, it is demonstrating the ability to confirm the pattern of activity of established drugs3. Moreover, there have been some examples of new compounds which exhibit tissue-determined selectivity and unusual patterns of cytotoxicity. Nevertheless, in vitro screens, as currently employed, are ill-designed to demonstrate activity with drugs which require metabolic activation, drugs acting via the immune system and drugs with bell-shaped dose-response curves. A more detailed discussion of in vitro testing is to be found in Chapter 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Driscoll, J. (1984). The preclinical new drug research program of the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Treat. Rep., 68, 63 – 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Alley, M., Scudiero, D., Monks, A., Hursey, M., Czerwinski, M., Fine, D., Abbott, B., Mayo, J., Shoemaker, R. and Boyd, M. (1988). Feasibility of drug screening with panels of human tumor cell lines using a microculture tetrazolium assay. Cancer Res., 48, 589 – 601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paull, K., Shoemaker, R., Hodes, L., Monks, A., Scudiero, D., Rubinstein, L., Plowman, J. and Boyd, M. (1989). Display and analysis of patterns of differential activity of drugs against human tumor cell lines: Development of Mean Graph and COMPARE algorithm. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 81, 1088 – 1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (1990). Mechanisms to improve chemotherapy effectiveness. Cancer, 65, 815 – 822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrap, K., Jones, M., Siracky, J., Pollard, L. and Kelland, L. (1990). The establishment, characterisation and calibration of human ovarian carcinoma xenografts for the evaluation of novel platinum anticancer drugs. Ann. Oncol., 1, 65 – 76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freireich, E., Gehan, E., Rail, D., Schmidt, L. and Skipper, H. (1966). Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey and man. Cancer Chemother. Rep., 50, 219 – 245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodey, G. and Legha S. (1987). The phase I study: general objectives, methods, and evaluation. Dev. Oncol., 46, 153 - 174

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieshaber, C. and Marsoni, S. (1986). Relation of preclinical toxicology to findings in early clinical trials. Cancer Treat. Rep., 70, 65 – 73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Steering Committee of the EORTC and the CRC (1989). General guidelines for the preclinical toxicology of new cytotoxic anticancer agents in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer, 26, 411 – 414

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, I. (1989). New endocrine agents, guidelines for future development. Br. J. Cancer, 60, 153 – 154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, A., Taylor, G., Calvert, A. and Harrap K. (1984). Modulation of anti-metabolite effects: Effects of thymidine on the efficacy of the quinazoline-based thymidylate synthetase inhibitor, CB3717. Biochem. Pharmacol, 33, 3269 – 3275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., Zaharko, D., Dedrick, R. and Chabner, B. (1986). Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials. Cancer Treat. Rep., 70, 73 – 80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riva, C., Rustum, Y. and Preisler, H. (1985). Pharmacokinetics and cellular determinates of response to 1-B-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine. Semin. Oncol., 12, 1 – 8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lennard, L., Lillyman, J., Van Loon, J. and Weinshilboum, R. (1990). Genetic variation in response to 6-mercaptopurine for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet, 336, 225 – 229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutty, C., Newell, D., Muindi, J. and Harrap, K. (1982). The comparative pharmacokinetics of pentamethylmelamine in man, rat and mouse. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 8, 105 – 111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EORTC PAM Group (1987). Pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation in phase I clinical trials. Commentary and proposed guidelines. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol., 7, 1083 – 1087

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, P., Davis, R., Carter, S., Newman, J., Schein, D. and Rail, D. (1970). The evaluation of anticancer drugs in dogs and monkeys for the prediction of qualitative toxicities in man. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 11, 3 – 40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin, M., Clark, P., Joel, S., Malik, S„ Osborne, R., Gregory, W., Lowe, D., Reznek, R. and Wrigley, P. (1989). A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 9, 1333 – 1340

    Google Scholar 

  • Legha, S., Benjamin, R., Mackay, R., Yap, H., Wallace, S., Ewer, M., Blumenschein, G. and Bodey, G. (1982). Adriamycin therapy by continuous intravenous infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer, 49, 1762 – 1766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutcher, J. and Gailani, S. (1972). Phase I study of l-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-l- nitrosourea (Me-CCNU) in cancer patients. Clin. Res., 20, 568

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., Walder, M., Canello, G., Schein, P., Chabner, B. and DeVita, V. (1973). Initial clinical trials with methyl-CCNU l-(2-chlorethyl-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-l-nitrosourea (Me-CCNU). Cancer, 31, 1164 – 1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judson, I., Calvert, A., Rutty, C., Abel, G., Gumbrell, L., Graham, M., Evans, B., Wilman, D., Ashley, S. and Cairnduff, F. (1989). Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of Trimelamol (N2,N4,N6-trihydroxymethyl-N2,N4,N6-trimethylmelamine). Cancer Res., 49, 5475 – 5479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Ewen, C., Mackintosh, J., Fox, B., Thatcher, N., Scarffe, J., Vezin, R. and Crowther, D. (1988). A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of amphethinile. Br. J. Cancer, 57, 623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hantel, A., Donehower, R., Rowinsky, E., Vance, E., Clarke, B., McGuire, W., Ettinger, D., Noe, D. and Grochow, L. (1990). Phase I study and pharmacodynamics of piroxantrone (NSC 349174), a new anthrapyrazole. Cancer Res., 50, 3284 – 3288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, B., Graham, M., Newell, D., Gumbrell, L. and Calvert, A. (1988). Phase I study of the anthrapyrazole CI941 with pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 7, 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianni, L., Surbone, A., Vigano, L., Gambetta, A. and Bonadonna, G. (1989). The pharmacokinetics guidelines for phase I dose escalations: the case of 4’ dehydroxy-4’ -iodo- doxorubicin (I-Dox). Proceedings of the 6th NCI-EORTC Symposium on New Drugs in Cancer Therapy, p. 297 (Amsterdam:NCI/EORTC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., Grieshaber, C. and Chabner, B. (1990). Pharmacologically guided phase I clinical trials based upon preclinical drug development. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 82, 1321 – 1326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, M. (1985). Models to identify sources of pharmacokinetic variability. In Rowland, M., Sheiner, L. Steiner, J.-L. (eds.) Variability in Drug Therapy, pp. 11 – 28. ( New York, NY; Raven Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkes, A. and Collins, J. (1987). Reappraisal of some dosage adjustment guidelines. Cancer Treat. Rep., 71, 229 – 233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Twelves, C. J., Dobbs, N. A., Gregory, W. M., Summers, L. A., Rubens, R. D. and Richards, M. A. (1991). A dosage nomogram for epirubicin (Epi) based on liver biochemistry tests. Br. J. Cancer, 63(Suppl. XIII), 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Egorin, M., Van Echo, D., Tipping, S., Olman, E., Whitacre, M., Thompson, B. and Aisner, J. (1984). Pharmacokinetics and dosage reduction of c/s-diammine(l,l-cyclobutane- dicarboxylato)platinum in patients with impaired renal function. Cancer Res., 44, 5432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, A., Newell, D., Gumbrell, L., O’Reilly, S., Burnell, M., Boxall, F., Siddik, Z., Judson, I., Gore, M. and Wiltshaw, E. (1989). Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J. Clin. Oncol., 11, 1748 – 1756

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, A., Dearnaley, D. P., Nicholls, J., Jay, G., Mason, M., Harland, S., Peckham M. J. and Hendry, W. F. (1991). Effectiveness of carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin combination chemotherapy in good-prognosis metastatic testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. J. Clin. Oncol., 9, 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. E., Crom, W. R., Abromowitch, M., Dodge, R., Look, A. T., Bowman, W. P., George, S. L. and Pui, C.-H. (1986). Clinical pharmacodynamics of high-dose methotrexate in acute lymphocytic leukaemia. N. Engl. J. Med., 314, 471 – 477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egorin, M., Jodrell, D., Canetta, R., Langenburg, P., Goldbloom, E., Burroughs, J., Goodlow, J., Tan, S. and Wiltshaw, E. (1991). Tumor response and toxicity in ovarian cancer correlates with carboplatin (CBDCA) area under the curve (AUC). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol, 10, 184

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J., Abromowitch, M., Sinkule, J., Rivera, G. and Evans, W. (1987). Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: Systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. J. Clin. Oncol., 5, 1007 – 1014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. (1988). Clinical pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs: a basis for extending the concept of dose-intensity. Blut, 56, 241 – 248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, B., Forrest, A., Egorin, M., Zuhowski, E., Sinibaldi, V. and Van Echo, D. (1989). Phase I trial using adaptive control dosing of hexamethylene bisacetimide (NSC 95580). Cancer Res., 49, 3436 – 3440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, W., Iacoboni, S., Estey, E., Danhauser, L., Liliemark, J. and Keating, M. (1985). Pharmacologically directed ara-C therapy for refractory leukemia. Semin. Oncol., 12, 20 – 30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, E., Ozols, R., Tarone, R., Yuspa, S. and Poirier, M. (1987). Platinum-DNA adducts in leukocyte DNA correlate with disease response in ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum- based chemotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 5024 – 5028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M., Rodrigues, L., Gusterson, B. and Griffiths, J. (1990). 31PMRS of tumours. Monitoring tumour growth and regression by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Adv. Enz. Regul., 30, 217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietti, T. J. (1980). Evaluation of toxicity: clinical issues. Cancer Treat. Rep., 64, 457 – 461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1979). WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. WHO Offset Publication, 48. (Geneva: WHO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers, P., Jones, D. and Girling, D. (1985). Measurement of quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat. Symp., 2, 25 – 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby, P., Hobbs, S., Viner, C., Jackson, E., Jones, A., Newell, D., Calvert, A., McElwain, T., Fearon, K., Humphreys, J, and Shiga, T. (1987). Tumour necrosis factor in man: Clinical and biological observations. Br. J. Cancer, 56, 803 – 808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talmadge, J., Tribble, H., Pennington, R., Philips, H. and Wiltrout, R. (1987). Immunomodulatory and immunotherapeutic properties of recombinant gamma interferon and recombinant tumour necrosis factor in mice. Cancer Res., 47, 2563 – 2570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herberman, R. (1985). Design of clinical trials with biological response modifiers. Cancer Treat. Rep., 69, 1161 – 1164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talmadge, J. (1989). Development of immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of malignant neoplasia. Pathol. Immunopathol. Res., 8, 250 – 275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., Sharkis, S., Miller, C., Rowinsky, E., Burke, P. and May, W. (1990). Bryostatin 1, a unique biological response modifier: anti-leukaemic activity in vitro. Blood, 75, 1319 – 1323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Judson, I.R. (1992). Preclinical evaluation and phase I trials. In: Waring, M.J., Ponder, B.A.J. (eds) The Search for New Anticancer Drugs. Cancer Biology and Medicine, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0385-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0385-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6659-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0385-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics