Advertisement

Individual Labour Market Transitions

  • Denis Fougère
  • Thierry Kamionka
Part of the Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics book series (ASTA, volume 28)

Abstract

During the last ten years, the micro-econometric analysis of individual transitions has been extensively used for investigating some of the major problems inherent in the functioning of contemporary labour markets, such as the relations between individual mobility and wages, the variability of flows between employment, unemployment and non-employment through the business cycle, or the effects of public policies (training programs, unemployment insurance, etc.) on individuals patterns of unemployment. Typically, labour market transition data register sequences of durations spent by workers in the following states: employment, unemployment and non-employment. When individual participation histories are completely observed, through panel or retrospective surveys, the econometrician disposes of continuous-time realizations of the labour market participation process. When these histories are only observed at many successive dates, through panel surveys, the available information is truncated; more precisely it takes the form of discrete-time observations of underlying continuous-time processes. Our presentation of statistical procedures used for analysing individual transition or mobility histories is based on the distinction between these two kinds of data.

Keywords

Hazard Function Unemployment Insurance Transition Probability Matrix Mobility Index Sojourn Duration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalen O.O. [1978]: Non parametric inference for a family of counting processes, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 701–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaouze C.M. [1987]: Empirical evidence on the sign of the slope of the hazard rate from employment from a fixed effects model, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.2, No. 2, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson T. W. and Goodman L.A. [1957]: Statistical inference about Markov chains, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billingsley P. [1961]: Statistical inference for Markov processes. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burdett K., Kiefer N., Mortensen D.T. and Neuman G.[1984a]: Earnings, unemployment and the allocation of time over time, Review of Economic Studies, LI(4), 559–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdett K., Kiefer N., Mortensen D.T. and Neuman G. [1984b]: Steady states as natural rates in a dynamic discrete choice model of labor supply, in: Studies in labor market dynamics, edited by G.R. Neuman and N.C. Westergard-Nielsen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 74–97.Google Scholar
  7. Burdett K., Kiefer N. and Sh&rma S. [1985]: Layoffs and duration dependence in a model of turnover, Journal of Econometrics, 28, No. 1, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler J.S., Anderson K.H. and Burkhauser R.V.[1986]: Testing the relationship between work and health: a bivariate hazard model, Economics Letters, 20, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler J.S., Anderson K.H. and Burkhauser R.V. [1989]: Work and health after retirement: a competing risks model with semiparametric unobserved heterogeneity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 46-53.Google Scholar
  10. Card D. and Sullivan D. [1988]: Measuring the effect of subsidized training programs on movements in and out of employment, Econometrica, 56, 497-530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cazals C. [1991]: Etude de la mobilite des individus ages sur le marche du travail aux Etats-unis: un modele en temps continu, Cahier du Gremaq, Universite des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse.Google Scholar
  12. Chesher A., Lancaster T. [1983]: The estimation of models of labour market behavior, Review of Economic Studies, 609-624.Google Scholar
  13. Chung K.L. [1967]: Markov chains with stationary transition probabilities. Berlin: Springer - Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Clark K.B. and Summers L.H. [1982]: Unemployment insurance and labor market transitions, in: Workers, jobs and inflation, edited by M.N. Baily, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 279–317.Google Scholar
  15. Doob J.L. [1953]: Stochastic processes. New-York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Eckstein Z. and Wolpin K.I. [1989]: The specification and estimation of dynamic stochastic discrete choice models, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 24, No. 4, 562–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elfving G. [1937]: Zur Theorie der Markoffschen Ketten, Acta Social Science Fenicae, series A2, No. 8, 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. Flinn C.J. and Heckman J.J. [1982a]: New methods for analyzing structural models of labor force dynamics, Journal of Econometrics, 18, 115–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flinn C.J. and Heckman J.J. [1982b]: Models for the analysis of labor force dynamics, in: Advances in Econometrics, Vol. I, edited by R. BASMANN and G. RHODES, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 35–95.Google Scholar
  20. Flinn C. J. and Heckman J. J. [1983a]: The likelihood function for the multistate-multiepisode model, in: Advances in Econometrics, Vol II, edited by R. BASMANN and G. RHODES, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 225–231.Google Scholar
  21. Flinn C.J. and Heckman J.J. [1983b]: Are unemployment and out of the labor force behaviorally distinct labor force states?, Journal of Labour Economics, 1, No. 1, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fougère D. and Kamionka T. [1990]: Un modele markovien du marche du travail, Cahier du GREMAQ, Universite de Toulouse-I, forthcoming in: Annales d’Economie et de Statistique.Google Scholar
  23. Fougère D. and Kamionka T. [1991a]: Mobilite et precarisation sur le marche francais du travail: une analyse longitudinale pour les annees 1986 a 1988, Note du C.E.J.E.E., Universite de Toulouse-I, forthcoming in: Economie et Prevision (1992).Google Scholar
  24. Fougère D. and Kamionka T. [1991b]: Bayesian inference for the mover-stayer model in continuous-time, Cahier du Gremaq, Universite des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse.Google Scholar
  25. Fougère D. and Tahar G. [1987]: Participation au marche du travail et nuptialite: etude des interdependances au sein d’une cohorte, Working Paper CEJEE, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  26. Frydman H. [1984]: Maximum likelihood estimation in the mover-stayer model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, No. 387, 632–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geweke J., Marshall R.C. and Zarkin G.A. [1986a] Exact inference for continuous time Markov chains. Review of Economic Studies, L III, 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geweke J., Marshall R.C. and Zarkin G.A.[1986b]: Mobility indices in continuous-time Markov chains, Econometrica, 54, No. 6, 1407–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gourieroux C. and Monfort A.[1991]: Simulation based inference: a survey with reference to panel data models, Working paper No. 9106 CREST-ENSAE, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Ham J. and Lalonde R. [1990]: Using social experiments to estimate the effect of training on transition rates, in Panel data and labor market studies, edited by J. Hartog, G. Ridder and J. Theeuwes, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 157-172.Google Scholar
  31. Heckman J. [1990]: Alternative approaches to the evaluation of social programs ; Econometric and experimental methods, Barcelona Lecture, 6th World Congress of the Econometric Society, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  32. Heckman J.J. and Borjas G.J. [1980]: Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence, Economica, 47, 247–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hui W. T. [1986a]: State dependence and youth unemployment in Australia: a survival analysis, Australian National University, working paper, october 1986.Google Scholar
  34. Hui W. T. [1986b]: Modeling multiple spells of unemployment, Australian National University, working paper No. 135, July 1986.Google Scholar
  35. Imbens G. W. [1990]: An efficient method of moments estimator for discrete choice models with choice-based sampling, Discussion paper 9009, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  36. Joutard X. [1990]: Application des processus ponctuels au marche du travail: une etude dynamique des durees de chomage. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universite d’ Aix-M arseille-I I.Google Scholar
  37. Kalbfleisch J.D. and Lawless J.F. [1985]: The analysis of panel data under a Markov assumption, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, No. 392, 863–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kiefer N.M. [1988]: Employment contracts, job search theory, and labor turnover: preliminary empirical results, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3, 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiefer N.M. and Neuman G.R. [1982]: Wages and the structure of unemployment rates, in: Workers, jobs and inflation, edited by M.N. BAILY, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 325–351.Google Scholar
  40. Kingman J.F.C. [1962]: The imbedding problem for finite Markov chains, Zeitschrift fur Wahr-£scheinlichkeitstheorie, No. 1, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lancaster T. [1990a]: The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, New-York, USA, 336p.Google Scholar
  42. Lancaster T. [1990b]: A paradox in choice-based sampling, Working Paper No. 9017, Department of Economics, Brown University.Google Scholar
  43. Lancaster T. and Imbens G.W. [1990]: Choice-based sampling of dynamic populations, in Panel data and labor market studies, edited by J. Hartog, G. Ridder and J. Theeuwes, North-Holland, 21-44.Google Scholar
  44. Lancaster T. and Imbens G.W. [1991]: Choice-based sampling. Inference and optimally, Working Paper No. 9117, Department of Economics, Brown University.Google Scholar
  45. Lucas R. and Prescott E. [1974]: Equilibrium search and unemployment, Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magnac T. and Robin J.M. [1991]: An econometric analysis of labour market transitions using discrete and tenure data, Working Paper No. 9112, CRESTENSAE, Paris.Google Scholar
  47. Mortensen D. [1986]: Job search and labor market analysis, In: Handbook of Labor Economics, 2, O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds), Amsterdam, North-Holland, 849-919.Google Scholar
  48. Mortensen D.T. and Neuman G.R. [1984]: Choice or chance? A structural interpretation of individual labor market histories, in: Studies in labor market dynamics, edited by G.R. Neuman and N.C. Westergard-Nielsen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 98–131.Google Scholar
  49. Olsen R., Smith D. and Farkas G.[1986]: Structural and reduced-form models of choice among alternatives in continuous time: youth employment under a guaranted jobs program, Econometrica, 54, 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ridder G. [1986]: An event history approach to the evaluation of training, recruitment and employment programmes, Journal of applied econometrics, 1, No. 2, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ridder G. [1987]: Life cycle patterns in labor market experience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  52. Runnenberg J.Th. [1962]: On Elfving’s problem of imbedding a time-discrete Markov chain in a continuous-time one for finitely many states, Proceedings, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademic van Wetenschappen, ser. A, Mathematical Sciences, 65(5) 536–41.Google Scholar
  53. Rust J. [1991]: Dynamic Structural Models ; Problems and Prospects: discrete decision processes, forthcoming In J.J. Laffont and C. Sims (eds): Advances in Econometrics, Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of the Econometric Society.Google Scholar
  54. Sampson M. [1990]: A Markov chain model for unskilled workers and the highly mobile, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, No. 409, 177– 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singer B. [1981]: Estimation of nonstationary Markov chains from panel data, Sociological Methodology, Samuel Leinhart-Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  56. Singer B. [1982]: Aspects of non-stationarity, Journal of Econometrics, No. 18, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singer B. and Spilerman S. [1976a]: The representation of social processes by Markov models, American Journal of Sociology, 82, No. 1, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer B. and Spilerman S. [1976b]: Some methodological issues in the analysis of longitudinal surveys, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, No. 4, 447–474.Google Scholar
  59. Trivedi P.K. and Alexander J.N. [1989]: Re-employment probability and multiple spells: a partial-likelihood approach, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, No. 3, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tuma N.B. [1985]: Effects of labor market structure on job shift patterns, in: Longitudinal analysis of labor market data, edited byJ.J. Heckman and B. Singer, Cambridge University Press, USA, 327–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tuma N.B. and Hannan M. [1984]: Social dynamics: models and methods. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  62. Tuma N.B. and Robins P.K. [1980]: A dynamic model of employment behavior: an application to the Seattle and Denver Income Maintenance Experiments, Econometrica, 48 (4) 1031–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denis Fougère
  • Thierry Kamionka

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations