Abstract
In a three-year junior high school of 800 students—grades 7 (age 12), 8 (age 13), and 9 (age 14)—located south of the automobile bypass around Memphis, Tennessee, a mathematics teacher in a large classroom moves among her students as they work in groups of four. Her students sit at clusters of desks, and the walls are covered with numerical charts and mathematics slogans. Over the past 10 years, this teacher has made a significant transformation from conducting a very controlled classroom dominated by her lecturing. Now her students are much more actively engaged in learning mathematics by working and interacting with each other. She spends much less time standing in front of her classroom telling her students what to do. Her students are doing projects and writing about their thinking, individually and—especially—in groups. She has become very active professionally in writing grants to fund projects, attending professional meetings and institutes, making presentations at national meetings, and field testing a new mathematics curriculum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ayers, W. 1990. Rethinking the profession of teaching: A progressive option. Action in Teacher Education 12(1): 1–5.
Battista, M. T. 1994. Teacher beliefs and the reform movement in mathematics education. Phi Delta Kappan 75(6): 462–70.
Bell, B., and J. Gilbert. 1994. Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education 10(5): 483–98.
Berlak, H. 1992. Toward the development of a new science of educational testing and assessment. In Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment, ed. H. Berlak, F. M. Newmann, E. Adams, D. A. Archbald, T. Burgess, J. Raven, and T. A. Romberg, 181–206. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bird, T., and J. W. Little. 1986. How schools organize the teaching occupation. The Elementary School Journal 86(4): 493–511.
Bruckerhoff, C. E. 1991. The Cleveland collaborative and the pursuit of mathematics curriculum reform. Educational Policy 5(2): 158–77.
California Department of Education. 1991. Mathematics framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade 12. Sacramento, CA.
Clark, D. L., and T. A. Astuto. 1994. Redirecting reform: Challenges to popular assumptions about teachers and students. Phi Delta Kappan 75(7): 513–20.
Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1990. Research on teaching and teacher research: Issues that divide. Educational Researcher 19(2): 2–11.
Cohen, D. K. 1991. Revolution in one classroom (or, then again, was it?). American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers 15(2): 16–23, 44–48.
Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC). 1991. Policy statement on equity in mathematics education. Newton, MA.
Ernest, P. 1991. The philosophy of mathematics education. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Fey, J. E. 1979. Mathematics teaching today: Perspectives from three national surveys. Mathematics Teacher 72(7): 490–504.
Fullan, M. G. 1982. The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. G., and S. Stiegelbauer. 1991. The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Goswami, D., and P. Stillman. 1987. Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton-Cook.
Heaton, R. M. 1992. Who is minding the mathematics content? A case study of a fifth grade teacher. Elementary School Journal 93(2): 145–52.
Heck, D. J., N. L. Webb, and W. Martin. 1994. Case study of Urban Mathematics Collaborates: Status report. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Hesse-Bieber, S., T. S. Kinder, P. R. Dupuis, A. Dupuis, and E. Tornabene. 1993. HyperRESEARCH [computer software]. Randolph, MA: ResearchWare.
Hofmeister, A. M. 1993. Invited rejoinder: Innovativeness is not a synonym for effectiveness. Remedial and Special Education (RASE) 14(6): 33–34.
Jaworski, B. 1991. Develop your teaching. Mathematics in School 20(1): 18–21.
Joyce, B., and B. Showers. 1980. Improving in-service training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership 37(5): 379–85.
———. 1982. The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership 40(1): 4–8, 10.
Keedy, J. L., and K. Rodgers. 1991. Teacher collegial groups: A structure for promoting professional dialogue conducive to organizational change. Journal of School Leadership 1(1): 65–73.
Lambert, L. 1989. The end of an era of staff development. Educational Leadership 47(1): 78–81.
Leinwand, S. J. 1992. Sharing, supporting, risk-taking: First steps to instructional reform. Mathematics Teacher 85(6): 466–70.
Lichtenstein, G., M. McLaughlin, and J. Knudsen. 1991. Teacher empowerment and professional knowledge. CPRE Research Report Series RR-020. Stanford, CA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Little, J. W. 1982. Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal 19(3): 325–40.
———. 1990. The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record 91(4): 509–36.
———. 1993. Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15(2): 129–51.
Little, J. W., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1991. Urban Math Collaborates: As the teachers tell it. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.
Lytle, S. L., and R. Fecho. 1991. Meeting strangers in familiar places: Teacher collaboration by cross-visitation. English Education 23(1): 5–28.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB). 1989. Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
McCarthy, C. 1994. Being there—A mathematics collaborative and the challenge of teaching mathematics in the urban classroom. In Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project, ed. N. L. Webb and T. A. Romberg, 173–95. New York: Teachers College Press.
Middleton, J. A., N. L. Webb, T. A. Romberg, S. D. Pittleman, G. M. Richgels, A. J. Pitman, and E. M. Fadell. 1989. Characteristics and attimdes of frequent participants in the Urban Mathematics Collaboratives: Results of the Secondary Mathematics Teacher Questionnaire. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Middleton, J. A., N. L. Webb, T. A. Romberg, and S. D. Pittleman. 1990. Teachers’conceptions of mathematics and mathematics education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Mumme, J., and J. Weissglass. 1989. The role of the teacher in implementing the Standards. Mathematics Teacher 82(7): 522–26.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 1980. Agenda for action. Reston, VA.
———. 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.
———. 1991. Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA.
———. 1995. Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.
Nelson, B. S. 1994. Mathematics and community. In Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project, ed. N. L. Webb and T. A. Romberg, 8–23. New York: Teachers College Press.
Peter, A., D. Clark, and P. Carlin. 1992. Facilitating change for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia 15(2): 67–79.
Pitman, A. 1994. Professionalism. In Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project, ed. N. L. Webb and T. A. Romberg, 67–82. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. 1988. Institutional issues in monitoring of school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(2): 221–51.
Popkewitz, T. S., and S. Myrdal. 1994. The “urban” in the mathematics collaboratives: Case studies of eleven projects. In Reforming mathematics in urban schools: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project, ed. N. L. Webb and T. A. Romberg, 129–50. New York: Teachers College Press.
Porter, A. 1989. External standards and good teaching: The pros and cons of telling teachers what to do. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11(4): 343–56.
Prawat, R. S. 1992. Are changes in views about mathematics teaching sufficient? The case of a fifth grade teacher. Elementary School Journal 93(2): 195–211.
Putnam, R. T. 1992. Teaching the “hows” of mathematics for everyday life: A case study of a fifth grade teacher. Elementary School Journal 93(2): 163–77.
Remillard, J. 1992. Teaching mathematics for understanding: A fifth grade teacher’s interpretation of policy. Elementary School Journal 93(2): 179–93.
Richert, A. 1994. Knowledge growth and professional commitment—The effect of the Urban Mathematics Collaborative on two San Francisco teachers. In Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project, ed. N. L. Webb and T. A. Romberg, 151–72. New York: Teachers College Press.
Roberts, H. 1992. The importance of networking in the restructuring process. NASSP Bulletin 76(541): 25–29.
Romberg, T. A., and J. A. Middleton. 1994. Conceptions of mathematics and mathematics education held by teachers. In Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project, ed. N. L. Webb and T. A. Romberg. New York: Teachers College Press.
Romberg, T. A., and N. L. Webb. 1992. The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project: C2ME as a case study on teacher professionalism. In Science and Mathematics Education in the United States: Eight Innovations, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 183–207. Paris.
Sato, N., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1992. Context matters: Teaching in Japan and the United States. Phi Delta Kappan 73(5): 359–66.
Serra, M. 1989. Discovering geometry: An inductive approach. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Simon, M. A., and D. Schifter. 1991. Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22(4): 309–31.
Stake, R., and J. Easley, eds. 1978. The case reports. Case studies in science education. Vol. 1. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
Stanic, G. 1991. Social inequality, cultural discontinuity, and equity in school mathematics. Peabody Journal of Education 66: 57–71.
Stodolsky, S. 1988. The subject matters: Classroom activity in mathematics and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Sykes, G. 1991. In defense of teacher professionalism as a policy choice. Educational Policy 5(2): 137–49.
Talbert, J. E., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1994. Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. American Journal of Education 102(2): 123–53.
Thompson, A. G. 1984. The relationship of teachers conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Education Studies in Mathematics 15(2): 105–27.
Webb, N. L., and T. A. Romberg, eds. 1994. Reforming mathematics education in America’s cities: The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project. New York: Teachers College Press.
Webb, N. L., S. D. Pittleman, T. A. Romberg, A. J. Pitman, and R. J. Wilhams. 1988. The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project: Report to the Ford Foundation on the 1986–87 school year. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Webb, N. L., S. D. Pittleman, T. A. Romberg, A. J. Pitman, E. M. Fadell, and J. A. Middleton. 1989. The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project: Report to the Ford Foundation on the 1987–88 school year. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Webb, N. L., S. D. Pittleman, T. A. Romberg, A. J. Pitman, J. A. Middleton, E. M. Fadell, and M. Sapienza. 1990. The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project: Report to the Ford Foundation on the 1988–89 school year. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Webb, N. L., S. D. Pittleman, M. Sapienza, T. A. Romberg, A. J. Pitman, and J. A. Middleton. 1991. The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project: Report to the Ford Foundation on the 1989–90 school year. ’, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Weiss, I. R. 1995. Mathematics teachers’ response to the reform agenda: Results of the 1993 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Paper presented in April at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco. CA.
Wilson, S. M. 1990. A conflict of interests: The case of Mark Black. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 309–26.
Wiske, M. S., and C. Y. Levinson. 1993. How teachers are implementing the NCTM standards. Educational Leadership 50(8): 8–12.
Woodrow, D. 1992. Learning from experience: Some principles of inset practice. Mathematics in School 20(4): 11–13.
Yerushalmy, M., and J. Schwartz. 1985. Geometric Supposer [computer software]. Pleasantville, NY: Sunburst Communications and Education Development Center, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webb, N.L., Heck, D.J., Tate, W.F. (1996). The Urban Mathematics Collaborative Project. In: Raizen, S.A., Britton, E.D. (eds) Bold Ventures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0339-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0339-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6639-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0339-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive