Advertisement

Effect of the Seeding Rate on Forage Yield and Quality of Triticale

  • Valdemar P. Carnide
  • Henrique Guedes-Pinto
  • Armando Mascarenhas-Ferreira
  • Carlos Sequeira
Part of the Developments in Plant Breeding book series (DIPB, volume 5)

Abstract

Studies on triticale as a cereal for grain have been carried out since 1975 in the Northeast of Portugal. Because of its high biomass production, triticale has also been studied as a forage crop since 1979. These studies were designed to investigate whether rye, the major cereal in that region which sometimes is grown as a forage crop or oats, sown in cereal-legume mixtures, could advantageously be replaced by triticale.

According to previous data, the line UTAD 36/85, from the UTAD triticale breeding programme, and the Polish cultivar Presto were selected for studying the effect of the seeding rate on forage yield and quality. The regional rye population Vila Pouca and the Portuguese oats cultivar Boa-Fé were used as testers.

Dry matter yield, forage quality (in vitro organic dry matter digestibility and crude protein content) and number of stems. m-2 were evaluated at the seeding rates of 175, 350, 525 and 700 viable seeds.m-2. Over all variables, triticale line UTAD 36/85 had the highest mean of dry matter yield (8715 kg.ha -1)while the regional rye population Vila Pouca had the lowest (7315 kg.ha -1). At the rates of 175 and 350 viable seeds.m-2 the average number of stems. m2 for all genotypes was similar but it increased with higher rates. The highest in vitro organic matter digestibility was observed on triticale cv. Presto, 66.6% at the seeding rate of 175 viable seeds.m-2, and the lowest on oats cv. Boa-Fé, 52.8% at the same seeding rate. The highest crude protein content was observed for all seeding rates on the rye population while the oats cultivar showed the lowest one.

Keywords

Crude Protein Content Forage Crop Forage Production Seeding Rate Forage Yield 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guedes-Pinto H, Carnide O, Carnide V. Dois anos de ensaios de adaptação corn triticales em Trás-os-Montes. Melhoramento 1982; 27: 49–89.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guedes-Pinto H., Bernard M. Étude comparative de quelques cultivars de blé, seigle et triticale dans le Nord du Portugal. I Productíons de grain, de paille, de proteins. Agronomie 1983; 3: 691–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carnide V, Ferreira A, Guedes-Pinto H. A comparative study of triticales lines as a forage crop. Proceedings of EUCARPIA Meeting of the Cereal Section on Triticale; 1988; 266: 591–604.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carnide V, Guedes-Pinto H, Ferreira AM, Sequeira C. Avaliação do potencial forrageiro do triticale em comparação com outros cereals. L Corte ao emborrachamento. Pastagens e Forragens 1991a; 12: 49–59.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carnide V, Guedes-Pinto H., Sequeira C, Ferreira AM. Avaliação do potencial forrageiro do triticale em comparação com os outros cereals. II. Corte no estado de grão pastoso/pastoso duro. Pastagens e Forragens 1991b; 12: 61–74.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carnide V, Guedes-Pinto H, Ferreira AM, Sequeira C. Triticale-legume mixtures. Proceedings of the Second International Triticale Symposium; 1990 Oct 1–5; Passo Fundo, Brazil. Passo Fundo: CIMMTY 1991c; 542–545.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bishnoi UR. Effect of seeding rates and row spacing on forage and grain production of triticale, wheat, and rye. Crop Sci. 1980; 20: 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hernando, J. Comparaction de genotipos de trigo a diferentes densidades de siembra: III. Produccion y supervivencia de hijuelos. Su porte al rendimiento final. Anales del Institute Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias 1981; 15: 73–82.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Power JF, Alessi J. Tiller development on yield of standard and semidwarf spring wheat varieties as affected by nitrogen fertilizer. J. Agric. Sci. 1978; 90: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joseph KM, Alley M, Brann D, Gravelle D. Row spacing and seeding rate effects on yield and yield components of soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 1985; 77: 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chatha MR, Ahmad D, Gill MA. Yield of wheat cultivars as affected by different seed rates under irrigated conditions. Pakistan J. Agric. 1986; 7: 241–243.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pfahler PL, Barnett RD, Luke HH. Seasonal distribution of rye forage production in Florida as affected by population, seeding rate, location, and year. The Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, Proceedings, 1982; 41: 61–67.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osman AE, Nersoyan N, Somarroo BH. Effects of phosphate, seed rate, seed ratio and harvesting stage on yield and quality of forage legume-cereal mixtures. Forage Res. 1983; 9 (2): 127–135.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marten CB, Barnes RF. Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzime systems. In: Pigden WC, Balch CC,Graham M, ed. Standardization of analyticalmethodology for feeds. Ottawa, IDRC, 1980; 61–71.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 12th ed., AOAC, Washington D. C., 1975.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Folkins LP, Kaufmann ML. Yield and Morphological studies with oats for forage and grain productions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1974; 54: 617–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lopez JR. Breeding forage and dual-purpose triticale in Bordenave, Argentina. Northern Mexico. Proceedings of the Second International Triticale Symposium; 1990 Oct 1–5; Passo Fundo, Brazil. Passo Fundo: CIMMTY 1991; 161–163.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lozano AJ. Studies on triticale forage production under semiarid conditions of Northern Mexico. Proceedings of the Second International Triticale Symposium; 1990 Oct 1–5; Passo Fundo, Brazil. Passo Fundo: CIMMTY 1991; 264–267.Google Scholar
  19. Wright RL, Agyare JA, Jessop RS. Selection factors for Australian grazing/dual purpose Triticales. Proceedings of the Second International Triticale Symposium; 1990 Oct 1–5; Passo Fundo, Brazil. Passo Fundo: CIMMTY 1991; 438–441.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jessop RS, Leterme P, Wright R, López J, Kolding M, Fiolho E. Triticale as forage or grain for animals. Proceedings of the Second International Triticale Symposium; 1990 Oct 1–5; Passo Fundo, Brazil. Passo Fundo: CIMMTY 1991; 64–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valdemar P. Carnide
    • 1
  • Henrique Guedes-Pinto
    • 1
  • Armando Mascarenhas-Ferreira
    • 2
  • Carlos Sequeira
    • 2
  1. 1.Depto. de Genética e BiotecnologiaUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal
  2. 2.Depto. de Nutriçâo AnimalUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal

Personalised recommendations