Advertisement

Assisting Creativity by Composite Representation

  • Ewa Grabska
  • Adam Borkowski

Abstract

The paper presents a composite syntactic-semantic representation of objects that is particularly suited for creative design in engineering. This representation is to a great extent oriented towards visual evaluation. The role of emergence both in art and in engineering design is discussed firstly. It is shown on examples taken from Escher’s prints, Civil Engineering and Mechanical Engineering that the emergence can occur with respect to the shape of the object or to its internal structure or topology. The composite representation supports the search for alternative solutions in both domains. It has been implemented as a design tool including the editor of graph grammars, the generator of composition graphs, the library of primitives and the visualisation module.

Keywords

Conceptual Solution Graph Grammar Creative Design Realization Scheme Composite Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boulanger, S. and Smith, I.: 1994, Models of design processes, in I. Smith (ed.), Proceedings of the EGSEAI Workshop, Lausanne, pp. 132–145.Google Scholar
  2. Borkowski, A. and Grabska, E.: 1995, Representing designs by composition graphs, in IABSE Colloquium Bergamo 1995, Knowledge Support Systems in Civil Engineering, IABSE Reports, Vol. 72, Zürich, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
  3. Coyne, R. D., Rosenman, M. A., Radford, A. D., Balachandran, M. and Gero, J. S.: 1990, Knowledged-Based Design System, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Edmonds, E. A.: 1992, Knowledge-based systems and new paradigm for creativity, in J. S. Gero and M. L. Maher (eds), Modelling Creativity and Knowledged-Based Creative Design, Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ, pp. 269–282.Google Scholar
  5. Gero, J. S. and Yan, M.: 1994, Shape emergence using symbolic reasoning, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21, pp. 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldschmidt, G.: 1991, The dialectics of sketching, Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grabska, E.: 1993, Theoretical concepts of graphical modeling: Realization of CP-graphs, Machine GRAPHICS and VISION, 2(1), 3–38.Google Scholar
  8. Grabska, E.: 1995, Visual evaluation in design space, in T. Oksala (ed.), Proceedings of the Decon 95 — Design: Emergence, Content, Baden-Baden, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Grabska, E., Oksala, T. and Seppanen, J.: 1994, Fractal dimensions in architecture design: Between artificial and natural beauty, Acta Polytechnica Scandynavica, Civil Engineering and Building Construction Series No. 19, Helsinki, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
  10. MacGillavry, C. H.: 1986, The symmetry of M. C. Escher’s “Impossible” images, Comp, and Math. with Appls, 12B(1/2), 123–138.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schattschneider, D.: 1990, Vision of Symmetry: Notebook, Periodic Drawings, and Related Work of M. C. Escher, W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Schmitt, G.: 1987, Expert systems and iterative fractal generators in design and evaluation, Proceedings of CAAD Futures’87, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
  13. Schneider, H. J. and Ehrig H.: 1994, Graph Transformations in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 776, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ewa Grabska
    • 1
  • Adam Borkowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Fundamental Technological ResearchPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations