Natural and Technological Disaster Management: Uncertainty in Technical, Sociopolitical and Scientific Issues

  • H. Denis
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 7)


A certain number of natural and technological disasters in Canada and around the world are presented to illustrate the role that complexity and uncertainty play in the issues pertaining to many catastrophes: technological, sociopolitical and, sometimes, scientific issues. In order to deal with this uncertainty, the interaction between organizational structure, culture and technology, as applied to developing countries, sheds new light on disaster management.


Natural Disaster Disaster Management Safety Culture Scientific Issue Dangerous Good 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali, L. (1992). Symbolic planning and disaster preparedness in developing countries: The Presbyterian Church in Vanuatu, Internat J. of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 10, 293 – 314.Google Scholar
  2. Anisuzzman, M. (1990). Managing flood disaster in Bangladesh: Implications for public administration, Asian Review of Public Administration, II, 12–28.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1988). Tornado: A Report - Edomonton and Strathcona County, July 31st 1987, Alberta Public Safety Services, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, L. (1989). Acceptable Risk? Making decisions in a toxic environment, University of California Press, Berkeley, 229 pg.Google Scholar
  5. Comfort, L.K . (1989). The San Salvador earthquake. In: Coping with Crises, U. Rosenthal, M.T.Charles and P.T. Hart editors, Ch.C.Thomas, Springfield, pp. 323–340.Google Scholar
  6. Couch, S.R. and J.S. Kroll-Smith (1990). Patterns of victimization and the chronic technological disaster. In: The Victimology Handbook, E.C. Viano, editor, Garland Publ. Inc., New York and London, pp. 159 – 176.Google Scholar
  7. Crozier, M . (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique, Seuil, Paris, 413 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Czada R.M . (1991. Muddling through a nuclear-political emergency: Multi-level crisis management after radioactive fallout from Chernobyl, Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 5, 293–322.Google Scholar
  9. Denis,H .(l990a).La gestion de catastrophe: Le cas d’un incendie dans un entrepôt de BPC à Saint-Basile-le-Grand, LesPublications du Québec.Québec,11pp.Google Scholar
  10. Denis, B. (1990b). Stratégies d’entreprise et incertitude environnementale, Agence d’Arc.Montreal and Économica, Paris, 328 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Denis. H. (1991). The complexity of technological disaster management: Technical, sociopolitical, and scientific issues, Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 5, 1–18.Google Scholar
  12. Denis, H. (1993). Girerles catastrophes: L’incertitude à apprivoiser, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal. Montréal. 248 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Denis, H. (1995). Coordination in u governmental disaster mega-organization, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 13 (1, 25–43.Google Scholar
  14. Drabek. T.E., H.L. Tamminga, T.S. Kilijanek and C.R. Adams (1981). Managing Multiorganizational Emergent Search and Rescue Networks in Natural Disaster and Remote Area Settings, University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder, Co.Google Scholar
  15. Duncan. R.B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dynes. R.R., E.L. Quarantelli and D.Wenger (1990). Individual and Organizational Response to the 1985 Earthquake in Mexico City, Mexico. Disaster Research Center. University of Delaware, Newark, Del., 135 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Galbraith, J.R.(l977).Organization Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 426 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Gephart, R.P . (184). Making sense of organizationaly based environmental disasters, Journal of Management, 10, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gill.B.(1978)Histoire des techniques Galbmurd.Paris, l852 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Gillespie, D.F. and D.S. Mileti (l977). Technology and the study of organizations: An overview and appraisal, Academy of Management Review, 2, 7–16.Google Scholar
  21. Krimgold. F.(1989). Search and rescue, Earthquake Spectra. Special Supplement, Armenia Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, 136–149.Google Scholar
  22. I.agadec, P. (l90l). “tats d”urgence: D“faillances technologiques et d”stabilisation sociale, Seuil. Paris, 4O6 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Mintzberg, H (1989). The Structuring of Organizations Prentice-Hall.EnglewoodCliffs, N.J 512 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Otway, H.P., P. Haastrup. W. Cannell. G. Gianitsopoulos, M. Paruccini (l988). Risk communication in Europe after Chernobyl: A media analysis of seven countries Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 2, 3–15Google Scholar
  25. Perrow,C.(1984).Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Basic Books, New York, 386 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Pidgeon. N.,B.A. Turner, B. Loft and D.Blockley (l99l).Hazard management and safety culture. In: Hazard Management and Emergency Planning: Perspectives on Britain. D. Parker and J.Bandmer.editors, James & James Science Publishers Ltd, London, pp. 243–254.Google Scholar
  27. Podesta, B. and R.S. Olson (1988). Science and the State in Latin America: Decisionmaking in uncertainty. In: Managing Disaster, L.K.Comfort, editor, Duke University Press, Durham and London, pp. 296–314.Google Scholar
  28. Quarantelli, E.L. (1990). Similarities and Differences in Institutional Responses to Natural and Technological Disasters, Disaster Research Center, Preliminary Paper #147, University of Delaware, Newark, Del., 41 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenthal, U. (1988). Disaster management in the Netherlands: Planning for real event. In: L.K. Comfort editor, Managing Disaster, Duke University Press, Durham and London, pp. 274 – 295.Google Scholar
  30. Scanlon, T.J. (1989). Toxic chemicals and emergency management: The evacuation of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. In: Coping with Crises, U. Rosenthal, M.T.Charles and P.T. Hart, editors, Ch.C.Thomas, Springfield, pp. 303–322.Google Scholar
  31. Showalter, P.S. and M.F. Myers (1992). Natural Disasters as the Cause of Technological Emergencies: A Review of the Decade 1980-1989. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Co., 42 pp.,Google Scholar
  32. Shrivastava, P. (1987). Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass., 308 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornburgh, R. (1987). The Three Mile Island experience: Ten lessons in emergency management, Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 1, 5–13.Google Scholar
  34. Tierney, K.J., with R.C. Anderson (1990). Risk of Hazardous Materials Release Following an Earthquake, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Del., 118 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, B.A . (1991). The development of a safety culture, Chemistry & Industry, april, 241–243.Google Scholar
  36. Turner, B.A. (1992). Stepping into the Same River Twice: Learning to Handle Unique Management Problems, Middlesex University Inaugural Lectures, London, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Voight, B. (1990). The 1985 Nevado del Ruiz volcano catastrophe: anatomy and retrospection, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 42, 151–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zuboff, S. (1986). Automate/informate: The two faces of intelligent technologyOrganizational Dynamics, Fall 4–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Denis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringEcole Polytechnique, University of MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations