Abstract
The evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs has been for a long time based on the quantification of premature beats at Holter and the inducibility of tachyarrhythmias at electrophysiological study. These approaches are convenient to provide short-term and reliable but limited evaluations on the effects of type I agents in relatively benign arrhythmias occurring in patients with a good cardiac function. The situation is much more uncertain for the long-term outcome in serious tachyarrhythmias occurring in severely diseased patients. In addition, the rules that have been erected for type I agents are not really adapted to beta-blockers and type III drugs, the effects of which are much more difficult to assess and depend at least in part on the target arrhythmia. There is an interest to evaluate the drug efficacy in terms of responders and nonre-sponders, and to try to understand the reasons for such a response. Rules for the evaluation of antiarrhythmic efficacy certainly have to be revisited.
Keywords
- Ventricular Tachycardia
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
- Antiarrhythmic Drug
- Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- Mitral Valve Prolapse
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coumel P. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and the management of arrhythmias. Precision versus inflexibility. Br Heart J 1983; 49: 201–4.
IMPACT Research group. International mexiletine and placebo antiarrhythmic coronary trial.I. Report on arrhythmia and other findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 1148–63.
Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Cast and beyond. Implications of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. Eur Heart J 1990; 11: 194–9.
Anderson KP, DeCamilla J, Moss AJ. Clinical significance of ventricular tachycardia (3 beats or longer) detected during ambulatory monitoring after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1978; 57: 890–7.
Mitra RL, Buxton AE. The clinical significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1993; 4: 490–6.
Leclercq JF, Leenhardt A, Le Marec H, Clémenty J, Hermida JS, Sebag C, Aliot E and the Working Group of the French Society of Cardiology. Predictive value of electrophysiologic studies during treatment of ventricular tachycardia with the beta-blocking agent nadolol. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 413–7.
Schmidt G, Ulm K, Barthel P, Goedel-Meinen L, Jahns G, Baedeker W. Spontaneous variability of simple and complex ventricular premature contractions during long-term intervals in patients with severe organic heart disease. Circulation 1988; 78: 296–301.
Anastasiou-Nana MI, Menlove RL, Nanas JN, Anderson JL. Changes in spontaneous variability of ventricular ectopic activity as a function of time in patients with chronic arrhythmias. Circulation 1988; 78: 286–95.
Rosen MR. The links between basic and clinical cardiac electro-physiology. Circulation 1988; 77: 251–63.
Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. The “Sicilian Gambit”. A new approach to the classification of the antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 1112–31.
Coumel P, Rosengarten MD, Leclercq, JF, Attuel P. Role of sympathetic nervous system in non-ischaemic ventricular arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1982; 47: 137–47.
Coumel P, Leclercq JF, Assayag P. European experience with the antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone for supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54D: 60–6.
Task Force of the Working Group on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 1304–10.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coumel, P. (1996). The evaluation of antiarrhythmics. In: Oto, M.A. (eds) Practice and Progress in Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 183. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6582-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0219-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive