Advertisement

Consumption Dynamics and Panel Data: A Survey

  • Jean-Marc Robin
Part of the Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics book series (ASTA, volume 33)

Abstract

Since the permanent income hypothesis was posed by Friedman [1957] and by Modigliani and Brumberg [1954] stating that consumption is a function of the flow of income (“permanent income”) that, if sustained across one’s life time would just compensate expected earnings and wealth, the question of the sensitivity of consumption to current income has focussed the attention of three decades of econometricians. Yet, until the end of the seventies the analysts always came up against the problem that permanent income is unobservable. Then Hall [1978] showed that by incorporating rational expectations a household maximizing expected intertemporal utility subject to the budget constraint behaves such that the marginal utility of current consumption next year is expected to be proportional to the marginal utility this year (see also Sargent’s [1978] contribution). He also found empirical evidence (on macro data) which suggested that lagged real disposable income and other variables dated t — 1 or earlier had little explanatory power on present (aggregate) consumption so long as lagged consumption was a regressor.

Keywords

Panel Data Euler Equation Marginal Utility Rational Expectation Liquidity Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altonji, J. G. and A. Siow [1987]: Testing the response of consumption to income change with (noisy) panel data, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, pp. 293–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blundell, R., M. Browning and C. Meghir [1989]: A microeconomic model of intertemporal substitution and consumer demand, University College London, Discussion paper no 89–11.Google Scholar
  3. Browning, M. [1987] Eating, drinking, smoking, and testing the lifecycle hypothesis, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, pp. 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning, M., A. Deaton and M. Irish [1985]: A profitable approach to labor supply and commodity demands over the life-cycle, Econometrica, 53 (3), pp. 503–543.Google Scholar
  5. Deaton, A. [1987]: Life-cycle models of consumption: Is the evidence consistent with the theory?, in T.F. Bewley, ed., Advances in econometrics, fifth world congress, volume II, 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flavin, M. A. [1981]: The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income, Journal of Political Economy, 86: 974–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. [1957]: A theory of consumption function, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Goodfriend, M. [1986]: Information-aggregation bias: The case of consumption, Unpublished, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, R. [1978]: Stochastic implications of the life cycle-Permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence, Journal of Political Economy, 86, pp. 971–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, R. and F. Mishkin [1982]: The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: Estimates from panel data on households, Econometrica, 50, pp. 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, L. P. and K. J. Singleton [1983]: Stochastic consumption, risk aversion and the temporal behaviour of asset returns, Journal of Political Economy, 91, pp. 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayashi, F. [1985]: The permanent income hypothesis and consumption durability: Analysis based on Japanese panel data, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, pp. 1083–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman, J. J. [1974]: Life-cycle consumption and labor supply: An explanation of the relationship between income and consumption over the life-cycle, American Economic Review, 64, pp. 188–194.Google Scholar
  14. Heckman, J. J. and T. E. MaCurdy [1980]: A life-cycle model of labor supply, R.E.S. 47, pp. 47–74.Google Scholar
  15. Lam, P.-S. [1991]: Permanent income, liquidity and adjustments of automobile stocks: Evidence from panel data, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 203–230.Google Scholar
  16. MaCurdy, T. E. [1981]: An empirical model of labor supply in a life-cycle setting, Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 1059–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Magnac, T. and J.-M. Robin [1991]: A dynamic model of choice between wage-work and self-employment with liquidity constraints, Discussion paper, INSEE, CREST, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Mankiw, G. N., J. J. Rotemberg and L. H. Summers [1985]: Intertemporal substitution in macroeconomics, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100: 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mankiw, G. N. and M. D. Shapiro [1985]: Trends, random walks and test of the permanent income hypothesis, Journal of Monetary Economics, 100 (1), pp. 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mariger, R. P. [1987]: A life-cycle consumption model with liquidity constraints: Theory and Empirical results, Econometrica 55, pp. 533–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meghir, C. and J.-M. Robin [1992]: Frequency of purchase and the estimation of demand systems, Journal of Econometrics, 53, pp. 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, C. R. [1987]: A reappraisal of recent tests of the permanent income hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy, 95, pp. 641–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robin, J.-M. [1991]: Short-run fluctuations of households’ purchases, Discussion paper, INSEE, CREST.Google Scholar
  24. Modigliani, F. - R. Brumberg [1954]: Utility analysis and the post-Keynesian function: An interpretation of cross-section data, in Post-Keynesian Economics, K.Kurihara, ed., Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Sargent, T. [1978]: Rational expectations, econometric exogeneity and consumption, Journal of Political Economy, 86, pp. 673–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapiro, M. D. [1983]: The permanent income hypothesis and the interest rate: Some evidence from panel data, Economics Letters 14, no 1, pp. 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stock, J. H. - K. D. West [1987]: Integrated regressors and tests of the permanrent income hypothesis, Unpublished, Harvard, Princeton, Stanford universities and NBER.Google Scholar
  28. Zeldes, S. P. [1989]: Consumption and liquidity constraints: An empirical investigation, Journal of Political Economy, 97, pp. 305–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Marc Robin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations