Econometric Models of Company Investment

  • Richard Blundell
  • Stephen Bond
  • Costas Meghir
Part of the Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics book series (ASTA, volume 33)

Abstract

In this chapter we outline the economic theory and econometric methods that have been applied in recent years to the modelling of company investment. Our focus is on empirical research that uses panel data on individual firms. The principal source of this data is published company accounts, and typically the number of individual firms is large and the number of time periods covered is small. We therefore concentrate on the measurement and estimation issues that are raised by data of this kind. Panel data has also been used to estimate models of investment using national accounts data at the industry level, where the number of individual industries is typically small and the number of time periods often much larger. This type of model requires a different approach more akin to that used in time series modelling, and will not be discussed in detail here.

Keywords

Cash Flow Capital Stock Econometric Model Investment Equation Adjustment Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, A.B. [1980]: Empirical investment equations: an integrative framework, in K.Brunner and A. Meltzer (eds.), On the state of macroeconomics,Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series, vol. 12.Google Scholar
  2. Abel, A.B. and Blanchard, O.J. [1986]: The present value of profits and cyclical movements in investment, Econometrica, vol. 54.Google Scholar
  3. Altug, S. and Miller, R.A. [1990]: Household choices in equilibrium, Econometrica, vol. 58.Google Scholar
  4. Altug, S. and Miller, R.A. [1991]: Human capital, aggregate shocks, and panel data estimation, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics, Discussion Paper no. 47, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, G.J. [1989]: Investment, finance and corporate tax policy, in M. Funke(ed), Factors in Business Investment, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, T.W. and Hsiao, C. [1982]: Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 18.Google Scholar
  7. Arellano, M. and Bond, S.R. [1991]: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchard, O.J., Rhee, C. and Summers, L.H. [1993]: The stock market, profit and investment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108.Google Scholar
  9. Blundell, R.W., Bond, S.R., Devereux, M.P. and Schiantarelli, F. [1992]: Investment and Tobin’s Q: evidence from company panel data, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 51.Google Scholar
  10. Blundell, R.W. and Smith, R.J. [1991]: Conditions initiales et estimation efficace dans les modeles dynamiques sur donnees de panel: une application au comportement d’investissement des entreprises, Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, no. 20/21.Google Scholar
  11. Bond, S.R. and Devereux, M.P. [1990]: Economic analysis and company accounts, Investigationes Economicas, vol. 14.Google Scholar
  12. Bond, S.R. and Meghir, C. [1994]: Dynamic investment models and the firm’s financial policy, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 61.Google Scholar
  13. Brainard, W.C., Shoven, J.B. and Weiss, L. [1980]: The financial valuation of the return to capital, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1980 no. 2.Google Scholar
  14. Chappell, H.W. and Cheng, D.C.[1982]: Expectations, Tobin’s q and investment: a note, Journal of Finance, vol. 37.Google Scholar
  15. Chirinko, R. [1993]: Investment, Tobin’s Q and multiple capital inputs, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 17.Google Scholar
  16. Devereux, M.P., Keen, M.J. and Schiantarelli, F. [1994]: Corporattion tax asymmetries and investment: evidence from UK panel data, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 53.Google Scholar
  17. Devereux, M.P. and Schiantarelli, F. [1990]: Investment, financial factors and cash flow: evidence from UK panel data, in R.G.Hubbard (ed.), Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance and Investment, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Edwards, J.S.S., Kay, J.A. and Mayer, C.P. [1987]: The Economic Analysis of Accounting Profitability, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Edwards, J.S.S. and Keen, M.J. [1985]: Taxes, investment and Q, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 52.Google Scholar
  20. Eisner, R. and Strotz, R.H. [1963]: Determinants of business investment, in Commission on Money and Credit: Impacts of Monetary Policy, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R.G. and Petersen, B.C. [1988]: Financing constraints and corporate investment, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988 no. 1.Google Scholar
  22. Galeotti, M. and Schiantarelli, F. [1988]: Generalized Q models for investment and employment, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper no. 88/13, London.Google Scholar
  23. Galeotti, M. and Schiantarelli, F. [1990]: Stock market volatility and investment: do only fundamentals matter?, C. V.Starr Center for Applied Economics, Working Paper no. 90–15.Google Scholar
  24. Gould, J.P. [1968]: Adjustment costs in the theory of the investment of the firm, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 35.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, R.E. and Jorgenson, D.W. [1967]: Tax policy and investment behaviour, American Economic Review, vol. 57.Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, L.P. [1982]: Large sample properties of generalised method of moment estimators, Econometrica, vol. 50.Google Scholar
  27. Hayashi, F. [1982]: Tobin’s average q and marginal q: a neoclassical interpretation, Econometrica, vol. 50.Google Scholar
  28. Hayashi, F. [1985a]: Corporate finance side of the q theory of investment, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 27.Google Scholar
  29. Hayashi, F. [1985b]: Tests of liquidity constraints: a critical survey, in T. Bewley (ed.) Advances in Econometrics, vol. II, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hayashi, F. and Inoue, T. [1991]: The relation between firm growth and q with multiple capital goods: theory and evidence from Japanese panel data, Econometrica, vol. 59.Google Scholar
  31. Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. and Rosen, H.S. [1988]: Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data, Econometrica, vol. 56.Google Scholar
  32. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A. and Scharfstein, D. [1991]: Corporate structure, liquidity and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106.Google Scholar
  33. Jorgenson, D.W. [1963]: Capital theory and investment behaviour, American Economic Review, vol. 53.Google Scholar
  34. Jorgenson, D.W. [1971]: Econometric studies of investment behaviour, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 9.Google Scholar
  35. King, M.A. [1974]: Taxation and the cost of capital, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 41.Google Scholar
  36. Lucas, R.E. [1967a]: Optimal investment policy and the flexible accelerator, International Economic Review, vol. 8.Google Scholar
  37. Lucas, R.E. [1967b]: Adjustment costs and the theory of supply, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 75.Google Scholar
  38. Lucas, R.E. [1976]: Econometric policy evaluation: a critique, in K. Brunner and A. Meltzer (eds.), The Phillips curve and labour markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  39. Lucas, R.E. and Prescott, E.C. [1971]: Investment under uncertainty, Econometrica, vol. 39.Google Scholar
  40. Meghir, C. [1988]: Attrition in company panels, mimeo, University College, London.Google Scholar
  41. Morck, R., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. [1990]: The stock market and investment: is the market a sideshow?, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1990 no. 2.Google Scholar
  42. Nickell, S.J. [1978]: The Investment Decisions of Firms, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nickell, S.J. [1984]: An investigation of the determinants of manufacturing employment in the United Kingdom, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 51.Google Scholar
  44. Pfann, G. and Palm, F. [1993]: Asymmetric adjustment costs in nonlinear labour demand models for the Netherlands and the UK manufacturing sectors, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 60.Google Scholar
  45. Poterba, J.M. and Summers, L.H. [1983]: Dividend taxation, corporate investment and q, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 22.Google Scholar
  46. Salinger, M.A. and Summers, L.H. [1983]: Tax reform and corporate investment: a microeconometric simulation study, in M. Feldstein (ed.), Behavioural Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sargent, T.J. [1978]: Estimation of dynamic labor demand schedules under rational expectations, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 86.Google Scholar
  48. Schaller, H. [1990]: A re-examination of the Q-theory of investment using United States firm data, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 5.Google Scholar
  49. Schiantarelli, F. and Georgoutsos, D. [1990]: Imperfect competition, Tobin’s q and investment: evidence from aggregate UK data, European Economic Review, vol. 34.Google Scholar
  50. Shapiro, M. [1986]: The dynamic demand for capital and labor, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101.Google Scholar
  51. Summers, L.H. [1981]: Taxation and corporate investment: a q-theory approach, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1981 no. 1.Google Scholar
  52. Treadway, A.B. [1969]: On rational entrepreneurial behaviour and the demand for investment, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36.Google Scholar
  53. Treadway, A.B. [1970]: Adjustment costs and variable inputs in the theory of the firm, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  54. Whited, T.M. [1992]: Debt, liquidity constraints and corporate investment: evidence from panel data, Journal of Finance, vol. 47.Google Scholar
  55. Zeldes, S.P. [1989]: Consumption and liquidity constraints: an empirical investigation, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Blundell
  • Stephen Bond
  • Costas Meghir

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations