Skip to main content

Uncertainty analysis of a greenhouse effect model

  • Chapter
Operations Research and Environmental Management

Part of the book series: Economics, Energy and Environment ((ECGY,volume 5))

Abstract

There are numerous mathematical models of many environmental phenomena and new ones are continually being constructed. These models, typically depend on a large number of parameters and are often able to reproduce historical trends of the quantities they represent. However, it would also be very useful to have a methodology for assessing the reliability of the models’ forecasts in terms of how fast they propagate errors. This would allow us to compare different models and, perhaps, select the one which magnifies errors at a slow rate. In this paper we deal with a model formulated as a dynamical system but we expect that conceptually similar approaches to the uncertainty analysis may be used in other classes of models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Braddock, R. D., Filar, J. A. and Zapert R. (1993). System and Control Theory Perspectives of the IMAGE Greenhouse Model, Lecture Notes in Control Theory and Information Sciences, Vol. 184, pp. 53–68. Springer Verlag.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, R.D., Filar, J.A., den Elzen, M.G., Rotmans J. and Zapert, R. (1994). Mathematical Formulation of the IMAGE Greenhouse Model, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 18, pp. 234–254, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.C. and Baybutt (1981). “Methods for Uncertainty Analysis: A Comparative Study”, Risk Analysis 4, pp. 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Elzen, M. (1993). Uncertainty and Risk Analysis for Global Change: An Integrated Modeling Approach, PhD Thesis, forthcoming, University of Limburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilks, D.W., Canale, R.P. and Meier, P.G. (1989). “Analysis of Model Uncertainty Using Bayesian Monte Carlo”, in Malina, F.J. Jr (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1989 A.S.C.E. Conference on Environmental Engineering, pp. 571–577, American Society of Civil Engineering, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J.A., Reilly, J.M., Gardner, R.H. and Brenkert, A. (1986). 2Uncertainty in Future Global Energy Use and Fossil Fuel C02 Emissions 1975 to 2075, TR036, US Dept. of Energy, Carbon Dioxide Research Division, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.E. and Lacis, A.A. (1990). “Sun and Dust Versus Greenhouse Gases: An Assessment of their Relative Roles in Global Climate Change”, Nature 346, pp. 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J., (Eds.) (1990). Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney S.K. (1992). Climate Change 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloeden, P.E. and Platen, E. (1992). Numerical Solutions of Stochastic Differential Equation, Springer Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijmeier H. and Van der Schaft A.J., Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, Springer Verlag, Amsterdam, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • O′Neill, R., Gardner, R.H. and Martin, J. (1980). “Analysis of Parameter Error in a Nonlinear Model”, Ecological Modeling 8, pp. 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan, A. and Small, M.J. (1992). “Bayesian Methods for Model Uncertainty Analysis with Application to the Future Sea Level Rise”, Risk Analysis 12/4, pp. 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J. (1990). IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruymgaart, P.A. and Soong, T.T. (1988). Mathematics of Kalman-Bucy Filtering, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T.M., and Raper, C.S.B. (1990). “Natural Variability of the Climate System and Detection of the Greenhouse Effect”, Nature 344, pp. 324–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T.M. and Raper, C.S.B. (1992). “Implications for Climate and Sea Level of Revised IPCC Emissions Scenarios”, Nature 357.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filar, J.A., Zapert, R. (1996). Uncertainty analysis of a greenhouse effect model. In: Carraro, C., Haurie, A. (eds) Operations Research and Environmental Management. Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0129-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0129-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6545-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0129-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics