Advertisement

Hazardous materials logistics: An annotated bibliography

  • Vedat Verter
  • Erhan Erkut
Part of the Economics, Energy and Environment book series (ECGY, volume 5)

Abstract

Hazardous materials can be extremely harmful to the environment and to human health, since exposure to their toxic chemical ingredients may lead to injury or death. These dangerous goods are used in processes in a variety of manufacturing and power plants, and also are generated as a by-product of industrial activity. They include explosives, gases, flammable liquids and solids, oxidizing substances, poisonous and infectious substances, radioactive materials, corrosive substances, and hazardous wastes. Hazardous materials require special treatment to render them harmless or less dangerous. Nevertheless, accidents during their transportation, use, and disposal can still result in undesirable consequences. Furthermore, people living near a facility dealing with hazardous materials might suffer from emissions when necessary controls are not implemented, and they may also experience a loss in their property values. Clearly, the management of hazardous materials constitutes an important problem for industries. Governments are also involved in hazardous materials management through the use of legislation and regulations, as well as taxes and economic incentives, to secure public and environmental safety.

Keywords

Hazardous Waste Nuclear Waste Hazardous Material Transportation Research Record Dangerous Good 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Descriptive papers on hazardous materials logistics

  1. Anderson, R. F. and Greenber M. R. (1982) “Hazardous waste facility siting.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(2): 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. F. (1986) “Public participation in hazardous waste facility location decisions.” Journal of Planning Literature, 1(2): 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, R. N. L. and T. K. Pierson (1984) “Hazardous waste facility siting processes: experience from seven states.” Hazardous Waste, 1(3): 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G. E. (1987) “U.S. nuclear waste policy: flawed but feasible.” Environment, 29(8): 6–7, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carnes, S.A., Copenhaver, E.D., Sorensen, J.H., Soderstrom, E.H., Reed, J.H., Bjomstad, D.J., and Peelle, E. (1983) “Incentives and nuclear waste siting: orospects and constraints.” Energy Systems and Policy, 7(4): 323–351.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, L. J. (1987) “Siting the nuclear waste repository: last stand at Yucca Mountain.” Environment, 29(8): 8–13,26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, P. and Wondolleck, J. (1980) “Handbooks for siting hazardous waste management facilities in New England.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1(3): 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colglazier, E. W. and Langun, R. B. (1988) “Policy conflicts in the process for siting nuclear waste repositories.” Annual Review of Energy. 11: 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, C. (1984) “Substance and procedure in hazardous waste facility siting.” Journal of Environmental Systems, 14(1): 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, C. E. and Lester, J. P. (1985) “Alternative levels of analysis in hazardous waste regulatory policy.” Policy Studies Journal, 14(1): 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle, D. F. and Sorensen, P. B. (1984) “The sensitive art of siting treatment facilities.” Consulting Engineer, 62(3): 48–51.Google Scholar
  12. Duberg, J. A., Frankel, M. L. and Niemczewski, C. M. (1980) “Siting hazardous waste management facilities and public opposition.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 1(1): 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterling, D. (1992) “Fair Rules for Siting a High Level Nuclear Waste Repository.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 11(3): 442–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterling, D. and Kunreuther, H. (1994) The Dilemma of Siting a Nuclear Waste Repository. Kluwer, Boston, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, M. L. P. (1984) “Improving community acceptance of hazardous waste facilities through alternative systems for mitigating and managing risk.” Hazardous Waste, 1(3): 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freudenburg, W. R. and Baxter, R. K. (1984) “Host community attitudes toward nuclear power plants: a reassessment.” Social Science Quarterly, 65(4): 1129–1136.Google Scholar
  17. Furuseth, O. J. (1989) “Community sensitivity to a hazardous waste facility.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 17: 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gervers, J. H. (1987) “The NIMBY syndrome: is it inevitable?.” Environment, 29(8): 18–20,39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goetze, D. (1982) “A decentralized mechanism for siting hazardous waste disposal facilities.” Public Choice, 39(3): 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenberg, M. R., Anderson, R. F. and Rosenberger, K. (1984) “Social and economic effects of hazardous waste management sites.” Hazardous Waste, 1(3): 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregory, R., Kunreuther, H., Easterling, D. and Richards, K. (1991) “Incentives policies to site hazardous waste facilities.” Risk Analysis, 11(4): 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadden, S. G. (1991) “Public Perception of Hazardous Waste.” Risk Analysis, 11, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatfield, T. H. (1989) “A formal analysis of attitudes toward siting a hazardous waste incinerator.” Journal of Environmental Management, 29(1): 73–81.Google Scholar
  24. Himmelberger, J. J., Ratick, S. J. and White, A. L. (1991) “Compensation for risks: host community benefits in siting locally unwanted facilities.” Environmental Management, 15(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirschhorn, J. S. (1984) “Siting hazardous waste facilities.” Hazardous Waste, 1(3): 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirschhorn, J. S. and Oldenburg, K. U. (1987) “From facility siting to waste reduction.” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 2(3): 98–104.Google Scholar
  27. Hodges-Copple, J. (1987) “State roles in siting hazardous waste facilities.” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 2(3): 78–88.Google Scholar
  28. Jaffe, M. (1981) “Deadly gardens, deadly fruit. The local regulation of hazardous wastes.” Planning, 47(4): 16–18.Google Scholar
  29. Kim, B. J. and Gee, C. S. (1992) “Hazardous waste treatment technologies”. Water Environment Research. 64(4): 469–479.Google Scholar
  30. Kirby, A. M. (1988) “High-level nuclear waste transportation: Political implications of the weakest link in the nuclear fuel cycle. ” Environment and Planning C, 6: 311–322.Google Scholar
  31. Kleindorfer, P. R. (1986) “Compensation and negotiation in the siting of hazardous waste facilities. ” The Science of the Total Environment, 51: 197–208.Google Scholar
  32. Kleindorfer, P. R. and Kunreuther, H. C. (1987) editors, From Seveso to Bhopal: Managing and Insuring Hazardous Risks. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Kraft M. E. and Kraut, R. (1985) “The impact of citizen participation on hazardous waste policy implementation: the case of Clermont County, Ohio.” Policy Studies Journal, 14(1): 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kunreuther, H. and Easterling, D. (1990) “Are risk-benefit trade-offs possible in siting hazardous facilities?.” American Economic Review, 80(2): 252–256.Google Scholar
  35. Kunreuther, H. and Kleindorfer, P. R. (1986) “A sealed-bid auction mechanism for siting noxious facilities.” American Economic Review, 76: 295–299.Google Scholar
  36. Kunreuther, H., Desvousges, W. H. and Slovic, P. (1988) “Nevada′s predicament. Public perceptions of risk from the proposed nuclear waste repository.” Environment. 30(8): 16–20.30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kunreuther, H., Fitzgerald, K. and Aarts, T. D. (1993) “Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo.” Risk Analysis. 13(3): 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kunreuther, H., Linnerooth, J. and Vaupel, J. W. (1984) “A decision-process perspective on risk and policy analysis.” Management Science, 30(4): 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lake, R. W. and Johns, R. A. (1990) “Legitimation conflicts: the politics of hazardous waste siting law.” Urban Geography, 11(4): 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall, E. (1991) “The Geopolitics of Nuclear Waste.” Science. 251: 864–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matheny, A. R. and Williams, B. A. (1985) “Knowledge vs. NIMBY: assessing Florida′s strategy for siting hazardous waste disposal facilities.” Policy Studies Journal, 14(1): 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCleland, G., William, H., Schultze, D. and Hurd, B. (1990) “The effect of risk beliefs on property values: A case study of a hazardous waste site.” Risk Analysis. 10(4): 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGlennon, J. (1983) “The Alberta Experience…Hazardous Wastes? Maybe in My Backyard.” The Environmental Forum. 2: 23–25.Google Scholar
  44. Millano, E. F., Jones, H. V. and Ball, R. O. (1992) “Hazardous waste: storage, disposal, remediation, and closure.” Water Environment Research. 64(4): 492–501.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1986) “Property rights, protest, arid the siting of hazardous waste facilities.” American Economic Review, 76: 285–290.Google Scholar
  46. Morell, D. (1984) “The siting of hazardous waste facilities in California.” Public Affairs Report, 25(5): 1–10.Google Scholar
  47. Morell, D. and Magorian, C. (1982) Siting hazardous waste facilities: Local opposition and the myth of preemption. Ballinger. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  48. Mumphrey, A. J. and Wolpen, J. (1973) “Equity considerations and concessions in the siting of public facilities.” Economic Geography, 49(2): 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peele, E. and Ellis, R. (1987) “Beyond the ‘not-in-my-backyard’ impasse.” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 2(3): 68–77.Google Scholar
  50. Popper, F. J. (1981) “Siting LULUs.” Planning, 47(4): 12–15.Google Scholar
  51. Portney, K. E. (1984) “Allaying the NIMBY syndrome: the potential for compensation in hazardous waste treatment facility siting.” Hazardous Waste, 1(3): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Portney, K. E. (1985) “The potential of the theory of compensation for mitigating public opposition to hazardous waste treatment facility siting: some evidence from five Massachusetts communities.” Policy Studies Journal, 14(1): 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Portney, K. E. (1986) “The perception of health risk and opposition to hazardous waste treatment facility siting: implications for hazardous waste management and policy from survey research.” Applied Geography Conferences. SUNY. Binghamton 1986, 9: 114–123.Google Scholar
  54. Pushchak, R. and Burton, I. (1983) “Risk and prior compensation in siting low-level nuclear waste facilities: dealing with the NIMBY syndrome.” Plan Canada, 23(3): 68–79.Google Scholar
  55. Ristoratore, M. (1985) “Siting toxic waste disposal facilities in Canada and the United States: problems and prospects.” Policy Studies Journal, 14(1): 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rundle, W. L. (1986) “Teaching negotiation skills: a simulation game for low level radwaste facility siting.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 6: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shelley, F. M. and Murauskas, G. T. (1985) “Implications of locational conflict concerning nuclear waste disposal facility siting.” Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 8: 176–181.Google Scholar
  58. Shelley, F. M., Solomon, B. D., Pasqualetti, M. J. and Murauskas, G. T. (1988) “Locational conflict and the siting of nuclear waste disposal repositories: an international appraisal.” Environment and Planning C, 6: 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N. N., Chalmers, J., Gesell, G. and Flynn, J. (1991) “Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level repository in Nevada.” Risk Analysis 11: 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, M. A., Lynn, F. M. and Andrews, R. N. L. (1986) “Economic impacts of hazardous waste facilities.” Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials. 3(2): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, V. K. and Desvousges, W. H. (1986a) “Asymmetries in the valuation of risk and the siting of hazardous waste disposal facilities.” American Economic Review, 76: 291–294.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, V. K. and Desvousges, W. H. (1986b) “The value of avoiding a LULU: hazardous waste disposal sites.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2): 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sullivan, A. M. (1990) “Victim compensation revisited. Efficiency versus equity in the siting of noxious facilities.” Journal of Public Economics, 41(2): 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Susskind, L. E. (1985) “The siting puzzle. Balancing economic and environmental gains and losses.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5: 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Swartzman, D., Croke, K. and Swibel, S. (1985) “Reducing aversion to living near hazardous waste facilities through compensation and risk reduction.” Journal of Environmental Management, 20: 43–50.Google Scholar
  66. Thomson, B. M. (1992) “Radioactive waste.” Water Environment Research. 64(4): 479–492.Google Scholar
  67. Vetsch, J. L. (1989) “Approaches to siting toxic and hazardous waste facilities: a comparison of procedures adopted by Ontario and Alberta.” Environment, 20(1): 60–69.Google Scholar
  68. Wetmore, R. D. (1980) “Massachusetts’ innovative process for siting hazardous waste facilities.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1(2): 182–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Willard, D. E. and Swenson, M. M. (1984) “Why not in your backyard? Scientific data and nonrational decisions about risk.” Environmental Management, 8(2): 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vedat Verter
    • 1
  • Erhan Erkut
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations