Advertisement

Bayesian Comparison of Models for Images

  • Alex H. Barnett
  • David J. C. MacKay
Conference paper
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 70)

Abstract

Probabilistic models for images are analysed quantitatively using Bayesian hypothesis comparison on a set of image data sets. One motivation for this study is to produce models which can be used as better priors in image reconstruction problems.

The types of model vary from the simplest, where spatial correlations win the image are irrelevant, to more complicated ones based on a radial power law for the standard deviations of the coefficients produced by Fourier or Wavelet Transforms. In our experiments the Fourier model is the most successful, as its evidence is conclusively the highest. This ties in with the statistical scaling self-similarity (fractal property) of many images. We discuss the invariances of the models, and make suggestions for further investigations.

Keywords

Fractal Property Wavelet Transform General Fractal Property Image Reconstruction Problem Uncorrelated Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, A. H. (1993) Statistical modelling of rough crack surfaces in metals. Internal Report for Non-Destructive Testing Applications Centre, Technology Division, Nuclear Electric plc.Google Scholar
  2. Daugman, J. G. (1985) Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2 (7): 1160 – 1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gabor, D. (1946) Theory of communication. J. Inst. Electr. Eng. 93: 429–457.Google Scholar
  4. Gregory, P. C., and Loredo, T. J. (1992) A new method for the detection of a periodic signal of unknown shape and period. In Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods,, ed. by G. Erickson and C. Smith. Kluwer. also in The Astrophysical Journal, Oct 10, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Heil, C. E., and Walnut, D. F. (1989) Continuous and discrete wavelet transforms. SIAM Review 31 (4): 628–666.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mandelbrot, B. (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman and Co.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Press, W., B.P. Flannery, S. T., and Vetterling, W. (1993) Numerical Recipes in C, Second Edition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Strang, G. (1989) Wavelets and dilation equations: A brief introduction. SIAM Review 31 (4): 614–627.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex H. Barnett
    • 1
  • David J. C. MacKay
    • 1
  1. 1.Cavendish LaboratoryCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations