Advertisement

Transformation and regeneration of orchardgrass protoplasts

  • Michael E. Horn

Abstract

The idea of using embryogenic suspension cultures as a source material for protoplasts was first popularized by I.K. Vasil and co-workers. The reasons for the success of embryogenic suspension cells giving totipotent protoplasts are, in hindsight, very clear. First, the cells in these suspension cultures (indeed, in all suspension cultures) are dividing relatively rapidly. The resultant protoplasts are already programmed to divide and, in fact, do so after only three to four days following plating. Second, as embryogenic cultures, every cell in every aggregate should have the ability to regenerate into somatic embryos which can convert into plantlets. Since non-embryogenic cultures rarely are able to produce plantlets, it seems unlikely such cultures could give protoplasts capable of doing much more than reconstituting a cell wall and going through a division or two. Starting with meristems of some type as the protoplast source material would seem to satisfy the above criteria but they are hard to isolate en masse and actually contain only a few percent of cells dividing. This latter point is also true of embryogenic callus as the plating efficiency is always extremely poor with embryogenic callus-derived protoplasts. Thus, currently the only source from which to reliably obtain large quantities of totipotent monocotyledonous protoplasts is from embryogenic suspension cultures.

Keywords

Somatic Embryo Suspension Culture Protoplast Isolation Embryogenic Suspension Cell Embryogenic Suspension Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Horn ME, Shillito RD, Conger BV, Harms CT (1988) Transgenic plants of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) from protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports 7: 469–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horn ME, Shillito RD, Conger BV, Harms CT (1989) Transgenic plants of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) regenerated following direct gene transfer into protoplasts. IN: EUCARPIA Congress Proc., Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding, Helsingor/Denmark 1988, Plenum Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shimamoto K, Terada R, Izawa T, Fujimoto H (1989) Fertile transgenic rice plants regenerated from transformed protoplasts. Nature 338: 274–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rhodes CA, Pierce DA, Mettler IJ, Mascarenhas D, Detmer JJ (1988) Genetically transformed maize plants from protoplasts. Science 240: 204–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, Chambers SA, Adams WR Jr, Willetts NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG (1990) Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. The Plant Cell 2: 603–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shillito RD, Paszkowski J, Potrykus I (1983) Agarose plating and a bead type culture technique enable and stimulate development of protoplast-derived colonies in a number of plant species. Plant Cell Reports 2: 244–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horn, ME, Matsuno T, Rose BL, Brink KB. Rapid scale-up of rice embryogenic cell cultures for the production of clonal plants. In PreparationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shillito RD, Saul MW (1988) Protoplast isolation and transformation. In: Plant Molecular Biology, A Practical Application, IRL Press, United Kingdom, pp 161–186Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rothstein SJ, Lahners KN, Lotstein RJ, Carozzi NB, Jayne SM, Rice DA (1987) Promoter cassettes, antibiotic resistence genes, and vectors for plant transformation. Gene 53: 153–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1972) Nutritional requirements for growth of Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126: 105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horn ME, Conger BV, Harms CT (1988) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of embryonic suspension cultures of Orchardgrass (Dactylic glomerata L.). Plant Cell Reports 7: 371–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Horn
    • 1
  1. 1.Agrigenetics Co.MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations