Skip to main content

Gene-for-gene recognition in plant—pathogen interactions

  • Chapter
Infection, Polymorphism and Evolution

Summary

Mediated through specifically matching allele pairs in the host and pathogen (at resistance and avirulence loci respectively), plants have a refined and highly discriminating capability to recognize and differentiate among genetic variants of potential pathogens. Knowledge of pathogen recognition by plants has primarily resulted from research associated with the selective breeding of crop species for disease resistance. The phenomenon is well described at the cellular, whole plant and population levels in terms of genetics, histology and associated biochemistry. However, a full mechanistic understanding is only now becoming feasible following the isolation and sequencing of putatively interacting plant and pathogen genes.

It is evident that the number of genes in plant genomes capable of specific pathogen recognition is large and that these genes are commonly clustered in complex loci sometimes comprising genes involved in the recognition of more than one taxonomically unrelated pathogen. For some genes, alleles with different recognition capabilities have been identified while there is also evidence for the existence of genes expressing identical recognition capability present at different loci in the same species as well as in different plant species. It seems likely that resistance genes are members of substantial multi-gene families and there is evidence that novel recognition capability may be created through interallelic recombination events.

In natural populations, there can be a spatial mosaic of resistance genotypes with individuals carrying a range of resistance alleles at a varying number of loci, some of which will exert selection on the pathogen population only under certain conditions and at certain stages of development. There have been few studies of the costs and benefits of particular resistance genes in the presence or absence of pathogen variants against which a gene may be effective or ineffective. The stage of host development at which the pathogen exerts the greatest impact on survival and fecundity is of particular relevance in this respect, as is the influence of mother plant resistance on the characteristics and quantity of inoculum to which progeny are exposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bevan, J.R., Crute, LR. & Clarke, D.D. 1993a Variation for virulence in Erysiphe fischeri from Senecio vulgaris. Pl. Path. 42, 622–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, J.R., Clarke, D.D. & Crute, I.R. 1993b Resistance to Erysiphe fischeri in two populations of Senecio vulgaris. Pl. Path. 42, 636–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, J.R., Crute, I.R. & Clarke, D.D. 1993c Diversity and variation in expression of resistance to Erysiphe fischeri in Senecio vulgaris. Pl. Path. 42, 647–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biffen, R.H. 1905 Mendel’s laws of inheritance and wheat breeding. J. agric. Sci. 1, 4–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, J.J. 1987 Diseases and plant population biology, 208 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crute, LR. 1985 The genetic bases of relationships between microbial parasites and their hosts. In Mechanisms of resistance to plant disease (ed. R. S. S. Fraser), pp. 80–142. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff and W. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangl, J.L., Ritter, C., Gibbon, M.J. et al. 1992 Functional homologues of the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance gene in bean and pea. Pl. Cell 4, 1359–1369.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, M.J., Jones, D.A. & Jones, J.D.G. 1993 Close linkage between the Cf-2/Cf-5 and Mi resistance loci in tomato. Molec. Pl. Micro. Interact. 6, 341–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fillingham, A.J., Wood, J, Bevan, J.R. et al. 1992 Avirulence genes from Pseudomonas syringae pathovars phaseolicola and pisi confer specificity towards both host and non-host species. Phys. Mol. Pl. Path. 40, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flor, H.H. 1956 The complementary genetic systems in flax and flax rust. Adv. Genet. 8, 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flor, H.H. 1971 The current status of the gene-for-gene concept. A. Rev. Phytopathol. 9, 275–296. Heath, M.C. 1987 Evolution of plant resistance and susceptibility to fungal invaders. Can. J. PL Pathol. 9, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, M.C. 1991 The role of gene-for-gene interactions in the determination of host species specificity. Phytopathology 81, 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, E.B., Beynon, J.L. and Crute, LR. 1994 Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of interactions between isolates of Peronospora parasitica and accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Molec. Pl. Micro. Interact. 7, 223–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, K.S., Richter, T.E., Bennetzen, J.L. & Hulbert, S.H. 1993 Complex duplications in maize lines. Molec. gen. Genet. 239, 115–121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert, S.H. & Bennetzen, J.L. 1991 Recombination at the Rp1 locus of maize. Molec. gen. Genet. 226, 377–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M.R. & Shepherd, K.W. 1991a Present status of genetics of rust resistance in flax. Euphytica 55, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M.R. & Shepherd, K.W. 1991b Analyses of phenotypes of recombinants and revertants from test-cross progenies involving genes at the L group, conferring resistance to rust in flax. Hereditas 114, 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M.R., Shepherd, K.W. & Mayo, G.M.E. 1989 Recombination among genes at the L group in flax conferring resistance to rust. Theor. appl. Genet. 77, 540–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M.R., Shepherd, K.W. & Mayo, G.M.E. 1991 An analysis of reversion among recombinants involving genes of the L group, conferring resistance to rust in flax. J. Genet. & Breed. 45, 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.A., Dickinson, M.J., Balint-Kurti, P.J., Dixon, M.S. & Jones, J.D.J. 1993 Two complex resistance loci revealed in tomato by classical and RFLP mapping of the Cf-2, Cf-4, Cf-5 and Cf-9 genes for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum. Molec. Pl. Micro. Interact. 6, 348–357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kesseli, R., Witsenboer, H., Stanghellini, M., Vandermark, G. & Michelmore, R.W. 1993 Recessive resistance to Plasmopara lactucaeradicis maps by bulked segregant analysis to a cluster of dominant resistance genes in lettuce. Molec. Pl. Micro. Interact. 6, 722–728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, B.S., Kesseli, R., Farrara, B. & Michelmore, R.W. 1987 A genetic map of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) with restriction fragment length polymorphism, isozyme, disease resistance and morphological markers. Genetics 116, 331–337.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G.B., Brommonschenkel, S.H., Chungwongse, J. et al. 1993 Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 262, 1432–1436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McRostie, G.P. 1919 Inheritance of anthracnose resistance as indicated by a cross between a resistant and a susceptible bean. Phytopathology 9, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, A.C. & Crute, I.R. 1989 A consideration of the genetic control of species specificity in fungal plant pathogens and its relevance to a comprehension of the underlying mechanisms. Biol. Rev. 64, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, T. 1987 The origin and structure of fungal disease resistance genes in plants. TIG 3, 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosa, Y. 1992 A model for the evolution of formae speciales and races. Phytopathology 82, 728–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K.M.S. & Hooker, A.L. 1968 On the structure of a gene for disease resistance in maize. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 61, 1300–1305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sudupak, M.A., Bennetzen, J.L. & Hulbert, S.H. 1993 Unequal exchange and meiotic instability of disease resistance genes in the Rp1 region of maize. Genetics 133, 119–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teverson, D.M., Taylor, J.D., Crute, I.R. et al. 1994 Pathogenic variation in Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola III. Analysis of the gene-for-gene relationship between pathogen races and Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars. Pl Path. (In the press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, A. & Mansfield, J. 1993 A proposal for a uniform genetic nomenclature for avirulence genes in phytopatho-genic pseudomonads. Molec. Pl. Micro. Interact. 6, 9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 The Royal Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crute, I.R. (1997). Gene-for-gene recognition in plant—pathogen interactions. In: Hamilton, W.D., Howard, J.C. (eds) Infection, Polymorphism and Evolution. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0077-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0077-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6523-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0077-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics