The responsive order: A new empiricism

  • E. T. Gendlin
Chapter

Abstract

The uniqueness of logic is upheld and contrasted with twenty roles of a wider “responsive order” that includes us and our procedures. Empirical responses are precise, but different in different approaches. Procedures and findings are independent of (not separable from) “their” concepts. Two-way feedback obviates a top-down derivation of findings from assumptions, hypotheses, history, or language. The postmodern problems of “interpretation,” “conditions of appearances” and relativism involve the ancient error of making perception the model-instance of experience. Instead, bodily interaction functions in language and precedes perception and interpretation. Logic, space time locations and individuated referents involve positional relations derived from comparing. Beyond Kuhn, Feyerabend, Newton and Einstein, if we can give interaction priority over comparing, the “responsive objectivity” of both can be upheld. A new empiricism, neither naive nor constructivist, uses the words “order,” “explication,” “truth,” and “exactly” to build on Wittgenstein and on Dilthey’s hermeneutic. Natural language is metaphor-like, “originally crossed.” Logic must ignore its assumptions. It must render everything as a machine and drop humans and animals out. A new discipline is proposed, to move between the logical and the responsive orders, to deal with the machine/human interface and the social uses of science such as bioengineering.

Keywords

Logical Inference Logical Consistency Logical Pattern Space Time Location Conceptual Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gendlin, E.T. and Lemke, J., “A Critique of Relativity and Localization,” Mathematical Modelling 4 (1983) pp. 61–72. Hereafter GRL.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quine, W.V., Ontological Relativity and Other Essays ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1969 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crease, R.P., The Play of Nature ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993 ), pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning (New York: Free Press, Macmillan, 1962); Paperback Edition, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997 ). Hereafter ECM.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKeon, R.P., Freedom and History and Other Essays (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990 ) and Thought, Action, and Passion ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954 ).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cavell, S., “Must We Mean What We Say?” in Ordinary Language, ed. V.C. Chappel ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. T. Gendlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Committee on Human DevelopmentUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations