Thingly hermeneutics/Technoconstructions

  • Don Ihde


Within the Euro-American community of philosophers relating hermeneutics to science there is a considerable disagreement about where hermeneutics may be located. The older traditions hold that hermeneutics apply to and are limited to the social, cultural, and historical dimensions of science. But newer approaches claim that hermeneutics applies to the very praxis of science and to the constitution of scientific objects. This paper sides with the latter perspective and argues that a tendency to retain vestigial positivist interpretations of science keeps the older tradition from seeing hermeneutics as deeply embedded in science praxis. After arguing this point historically, I turn to a hermeneutic recuperation of science, first by drawing from the hermeneutic approach of Joseph Rouse, and then by the “hermeneutic” constructionism of Bruno Latour. I finally turn to what I term “technoconstruction” in science, particularly in imaging processes, to show concrete cases of the hermeneutic preparation of scientific objects. I conclude that contemporary science has exceeded its earlier modernist framework and now operates in a constructionist-hermeneutic framework.


Visual Display Scientific Object Contemporary Science Laboratory Life Hermeneutic Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Joseph Rouse, Knowledge and Power: Towards a Political Philosophy ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987 ), p. 41.Google Scholar
  2. Bruno latour, Science in Action, ( Cambridge: Hardvard University Press, 1987 ), pp. 67–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don Ihde
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySUNY at Stony BrookNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations