Advertisement

Molecular Diagnosis of Toxigenic Fusarium Species

  • Giuseppina Mule’
  • Antonio Logrieco
Part of the Developments in Plant Pathology book series (DIPP, volume 11)

Abstract

Correct identification of species in Fusarium genera is important because many species are plant pathogens and same isolates produce potent mycotoxins (Marasas et al., 1984). Methods that have been used in Fusarium systematics include DNA-DNA hybridization (Ellis, 1988), RFLP analysis (Manicom & Baayen, 1993), RAPD markers (Schilling et al., 1996), isozyme (Huss et al, 1993), sequence analysis (O’Donnell, 1996) and electrophoretic karyotyping (Fekete et al., 1993). DNA-DNA hybridization may reflect relatedness at the level of isolates, but RFLP and karyotype analyses typically differentiate at level of genetically isolated groups. Problem with F. oxysporum in Boehm et al. (1994) where they found karyotype variation in strains belonging to the same VCG. RAPDs have been used to detect genetic differences between and within species. Variation in nucleotide sequence demonstrates relatedness at different levels depending on the sequence chosen for analysis. O’Donnell (1996) recently have developed a DNA sequence database using four loci: beta tubulin gene introns/exons, mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU) rDNA, nuclear large subunit (LSU) rDNA, and nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. We found positive correlation between phylogeny, secondary metabolites production and the sequence of nuclear LSU 28S rDNA.

Keywords

Internal Transcribe Spacer Secondary Metabolite Production Trichothecene Mycotoxin Fusarium Strain Electrophoretic Karyotype 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altomare, C., Logrieco, A., Bottalico, A., Mulè, G. Moretti A., & Evidente A. (1995) Production of type A trichothecenes and enniatin B by Fusarium sambucinum Fuckel sensu lato, Mycopathologia 129, 177–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boehm, E.W.A., Ploetz R.C., & Kistler H.C. (1994) Statistical analysis of karyotipe variation among vegetative compatibility groups of Fusarium oxysporum F.Sp. cubense, Molec. PL Micr. Interact. 7, 196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottalico, A., Logrieco, A., & Visconti A. (1989) Fusarium species and their mycotoxins in infected cereals in the field and in stored grains, in Chelkowski J. (ed.), Fusarium: mycotoxins, taxonomy and pathogenicity. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 85–119.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess, L.W., Forbes, G.A., Windeis C., Nelson P.E., Marasas W.F.O., & Gott K.P. (1993) Characterization and distribution of Fusarium acuminatum subsp. armeniacum subsp. nov., Mycologia 85, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, J.J. (1988) Section Liseola of Fusarium, Mycologia 80, 225–258.Google Scholar
  6. Fekete, C., Nagy, R., Debets, A.J.M., & Hornok, L. (1993) Electrophoretic karyotypes and gene mapping in eight species of the Fusarium sections Arthrosporiella and Sporotrichiella, Curr. Genetic. 24, 500–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Felsestein, J. Phylip version 3.4.1991. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  8. Hornok, L., Fekete C., & Giezey G. (1996) Molecular characterization of Fusarium poae, Sydowia 48(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, S.J. (1953) Conidia, conidiophores and classification, Canad. J. Bot. 31, 577–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Logrieco A., Peterson, S.W., & Bottalico, A. (1991a) Phylogenetic affinities of the species in Fusarium section Sporotrichiella, Exp. mycol 15, 174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Logrieco, A., Vesonder, R. F., Peterson, S.W., & Bottalico, A. (1991b) Reexamination of the taxonomic disposition and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium nivale NRRL 3289, Mycologia 83, 367–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Logrieco, A., Altomare, C., Moretti, A., & Bottalico, A. (1992a) Cultural and toxigenic variability in Fusarium acuminatum., Mycol. Res. 96, 518–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Logrieco, A., Mulè, G., Peterson, S.W., & Bottalico, A. (1992b) Genetic relatedness in Fusarium section Gibbosum strains.- Third European Fusarium Seminar. IHAR, Radzikow, Poland. (Abstract.)Google Scholar
  14. Logrieco, A., Bottalico, A., Peterson, S.W., Evidente, A., & Mulè, G. (1994) Molecular genetic criteria for the identification of atypical toxigenic Fusarium strains, in Llewellyn G.C., Dashek W.V. and O’Rear C.E. (eds.) Biodeterioration Research 4, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 177–188.Google Scholar
  15. Logrieco, A., Peterson, S.W. & Bottalico, A. (1995) Phylogenetic relationship within Fusarium sambucinum Fuckel sensu lato, determined from ribosomal RNA sequences, Mycopathologia 129, 153–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marasas, W.F.O., Nelson, P.E., & Toussoun, T.A. (1984), Toxigenic Fusarium species: Identity and Mycotoxicology, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
  17. Manicom, B.Q., & Baayen, R.P. (1993) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in Fusarium oxysporum F.Sp. dianthi and other fusaria from Dianthus species, Plant Pathol 42, 851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulè, G., Logrieco, A., Bottalico, A., (1995) Fusarium sp. FN-2B: a controversial strain genetically close to Fusarium poae, Mycotoxin. Res. 11, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagy, R. & Hornok, L. (1994) Electrophoretic karyotype differences between two subspecies of Fusarium acuminatum, Mycologia 86, 203–208.Google Scholar
  20. Niremberg H.I. (1981) A simplified method for identifying Fusarium spp. occurring on wheat, Can. J Bot. 59: 1599–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nirenberg, H.I. (1995) Morphological differentation of Fusarium sambucinum Fuckel sensu stricto, F. torulosum (Berk & Curt.) Nirenberg comb. nov. and F. venenatum Nirenberg sp. nov. Mycopathologia 129, 131–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, P.E., Toussoun, T.A., & Cook, R.J. (1981) Fusarium: Disease, Biology and Toxonomy., Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
  23. O’Donnell, K. (1996) Progress towards a phylogenetic classification of Fusarium, Sidowia 48(1), 57–70.Google Scholar
  24. Schilling, A.G., Möller E.M., & Geiger H. (1996) Molecular differentiation and diagnosis of cereals pathogens Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum, Sidowia 48(1), 71–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppina Mule’
    • 1
  • Antonio Logrieco
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Tossine e micotossine da parassiti vegetali, C.N.RItaly

Personalised recommendations