Abstract
One of the major challenges to enhance food security amongst rural populations in developing countries including Zimbabwe is the continued existence of high postharvest losses, accompanied by low yields due to climate change, among other factors. It therefore becomes imperative to investigate the level of adoption and utilization of ethno-postharvest technologies in a bid to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses to safeguard yields before consumption. Data was collected in Buhera district through triangulation, which involved semi-structured interviews with five elderly people snowball sampled and purposively chosen Agritex officers as well as questionnaires administered to 100 purposively selected smallholder farmers. Crops and technology observations during fieldwork also constituted an important component of the data gathering techniques. Research results show that although some long established and effective traditional methods like “tsapi” were abandoned, there are some residual traditional technologies still in use such as drying on “ruware”, threshing of small grains by cattle trampling and storing all crops in a traditional hut called “hozi” with the aid of pest repellents like cactus ash. Major factors leading to the demise of most traditional technologies include the absence of suitable education and information dissemination structures and competition from vigorously promoted western methods among others. It was concluded that in order to effectively minimize postharvest losses, indigenous technologies must be studied, documented and promoted by both practitioners and external agencies such as Agritex, and non-governmental organizations. Where possible, they can be augmented by modern day technologies to reduce the costs of post harvest storage for marginalized and poorly resourced smallholder farmers in the area.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
African Ministerial Council On Science and Technology (2011) Technologies to reduce post-harvest food loss. R and D flagship, NEPAD and AU. Pretoria pp 1–3
African News (2011) African grain losses after harvest cost US$4billion. http://africabusiness.com/2011/06/02/african-grain-losses-after-harvest-cost-4-billion-fao-says/. Accessed 2 June 2011 (p 1)
Agritex Report (2010) Agricultural food security brief. March 2010, Zimbabwe. pp 1–14
Appiah F, Guisse R, Dartey PKA (2011) Post harvest losses of rice from harvesting to milling in Ghana. J Stored Prod Postharvest Res 2(4):64–71
Atkinson R, Flint J (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Soc Res Update 33:1–4
Bett C, Nguyo R (2007) Post-harvest storage practices and techniques used by farmers in semi-arid eastern and central Kenya. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc 8:1023–1223
Blaxter L, Hughes C, Tight M (1999) How to research. Viva Books, New Delhi, p 49
Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2004) Manicaland census report 2002: province profile. Government Printers, Harare, pp 25, 101
Centre on Integrated Rural Development for Asia and the Pacific (CIRDAP) (2010) Reduction of post harvest losses by improving storage methods and technologies. Dhaka, pp 1–4
FAO (2010) Zimbabwe: transitioning emergency into rehabilitation and development (Plan of action 2010–2015). Eastlea, Harare, pp. 10–12
Faugier J, Sargeant M (1997) Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nursing 26:790–797
Harris KL, Lindbald CJ (1978) Postharvest grain loss assessment methods: a manual of methods for the evaluation of postharvest losses. American Association of Cereal Chemists, pp 7–30
Hodges RJ, Buzby JC, Bennett B (2010) Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J Agric Sci. pp 1–9. doi:10.1017/S0021859610000936
Madrid M (2011) Reducing postharvest losses and improving fruit quality worldwide: the one-billion-dollar untapped business opportunity. http://www.fruitprofits.com/ing/articulo.asp?reg=26. Accessed 6 Nov 2011
Mararike CG (1999) Survival strategies in rural Zimbabwe. Mond books, Harare, pp 4–33
Masarirambi MT, Mavuso V, Songwe VD, Nkambule TP, Mhazo N (2010) Indigenous post-harvest handling and processing of traditional vegetables in Swaziland: a review. Afr J Agric Res 5(24):3333–3341
Mugabe FT, Hodnett M, Senzanje A (2007) Comparative hydrological behaviour of two small catchments in semi-arid Zimbabwe. J Arid Env 69:599–616
Mutekwa VT (2009) Climate change impacts and adaptation in the agricultural sector: the case of smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. J Sustain Dev Afr 11(2):237–256
Mutekwa V, Kusangaya S (2006) Contribution of rainwater harvesting technologies to rural livelihoods in Zimbabwe: the case of Ngundu ward in Chivi District. Water SA:32:437–444 (3 July)
Nyamapfene K (1991) Soils of Zimbabwe. Nehanda publications, Harare, p 35
Ofor MO, Ibeawuchi II (2010) Sun-drying—a low cost technology for reducing postharvest losses. Academia Arena 2(1):56–59
Osunde ZD (2008) Minimizing postharvest losses in yam (Dioscorea spp.): treatments and techniques. In Robertson GL, Lupien JR (eds) Using food science and technology to improve nutrition and promote national development. International Union of Food Science and Technology, pp 1–10
Sargent SA, Ritenour MA, Brecht JK (2000) Handling, cooling and sanitation techniques for maintaining postharvest quality. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, pp 2–5
Thomson S (1997) Adaptive sampling in behavioural surveys, NIDA Research Monograph. National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, pp 296–319
Usman M (2009) Reducing postharvest food losses through appropriate methods of preservation: an imperative for actualisation of millennium development goals by year 2015. Voice Teach 1(2):56–61
World Bank (2011) Missing food: the case of postharvest grain losses in Sub-Saharan Africa. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, pp 1–43
Zinyama LM, Campbell DJ, Matiza T (1991) Coping with food deficits in rural Zimbabwe: the sequential adoptions of indigenous strategies. Res Rural Sociol Dev 5:23–34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marambanyika, T., Mutekwa, T., Kusena, W. (2014). Adoption and Utilization of Ethno-postharvest Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in Semi-arid Regions of Zimbabwe: Case of Buhera District. In: Behnassi, M., Shahid, S., Mintz-Habib, N. (eds) Science, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7956-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7957-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)