Skip to main content

Adoption and Utilization of Ethno-postharvest Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in Semi-arid Regions of Zimbabwe: Case of Buhera District

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System

Abstract

One of the major challenges to enhance food security amongst rural populations in developing countries including Zimbabwe is the continued existence of high postharvest losses, accompanied by low yields due to climate change, among other factors. It therefore becomes imperative to investigate the level of adoption and utilization of ethno-postharvest technologies in a bid to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses to safeguard yields before consumption. Data was collected in Buhera district through triangulation, which involved semi-structured interviews with five elderly people snowball sampled and purposively chosen Agritex officers as well as questionnaires administered to 100 purposively selected smallholder farmers. Crops and technology observations during fieldwork also constituted an important component of the data gathering techniques. Research results show that although some long established and effective traditional methods like “tsapi” were abandoned, there are some residual traditional technologies still in use such as drying on “ruware”, threshing of small grains by cattle trampling and storing all crops in a traditional hut called “hozi” with the aid of pest repellents like cactus ash. Major factors leading to the demise of most traditional technologies include the absence of suitable education and information dissemination structures and competition from vigorously promoted western methods among others. It was concluded that in order to effectively minimize postharvest losses, indigenous technologies must be studied, documented and promoted by both practitioners and external agencies such as Agritex, and non-governmental organizations. Where possible, they can be augmented by modern day technologies to reduce the costs of post harvest storage for marginalized and poorly resourced smallholder farmers in the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • African Ministerial Council On Science and Technology (2011) Technologies to reduce post-harvest food loss. R and D flagship, NEPAD and AU. Pretoria pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • African News (2011) African grain losses after harvest cost US$4billion. http://africabusiness.com/2011/06/02/african-grain-losses-after-harvest-cost-4-billion-fao-says/. Accessed 2 June 2011 (p 1)

  • Agritex Report (2010) Agricultural food security brief. March 2010, Zimbabwe. pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah F, Guisse R, Dartey PKA (2011) Post harvest losses of rice from harvesting to milling in Ghana. J Stored Prod Postharvest Res 2(4):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R, Flint J (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Soc Res Update 33:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bett C, Nguyo R (2007) Post-harvest storage practices and techniques used by farmers in semi-arid eastern and central Kenya. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc 8:1023–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter L, Hughes C, Tight M (1999) How to research. Viva Books, New Delhi, p 49

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2004) Manicaland census report 2002: province profile. Government Printers, Harare, pp 25, 101

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre on Integrated Rural Development for Asia and the Pacific (CIRDAP) (2010) Reduction of post harvest losses by improving storage methods and technologies. Dhaka, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Zimbabwe: transitioning emergency into rehabilitation and development (Plan of action 2010–2015). Eastlea, Harare, pp. 10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugier J, Sargeant M (1997) Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nursing 26:790–797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris KL, Lindbald CJ (1978) Postharvest grain loss assessment methods: a manual of methods for the evaluation of postharvest losses. American Association of Cereal Chemists, pp 7–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges RJ, Buzby JC, Bennett B (2010) Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J Agric Sci. pp 1–9. doi:10.1017/S0021859610000936

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrid M (2011) Reducing postharvest losses and improving fruit quality worldwide: the one-billion-dollar untapped business opportunity. http://www.fruitprofits.com/ing/articulo.asp?reg=26. Accessed 6 Nov 2011

  • Mararike CG (1999) Survival strategies in rural Zimbabwe. Mond books, Harare, pp 4–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Masarirambi MT, Mavuso V, Songwe VD, Nkambule TP, Mhazo N (2010) Indigenous post-harvest handling and processing of traditional vegetables in Swaziland: a review. Afr J Agric Res 5(24):3333–3341

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugabe FT, Hodnett M, Senzanje A (2007) Comparative hydrological behaviour of two small catchments in semi-arid Zimbabwe. J Arid Env 69:599–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutekwa VT (2009) Climate change impacts and adaptation in the agricultural sector: the case of smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. J Sustain Dev Afr 11(2):237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutekwa V, Kusangaya S (2006) Contribution of rainwater harvesting technologies to rural livelihoods in Zimbabwe: the case of Ngundu ward in Chivi District. Water SA:32:437–444 (3 July)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamapfene K (1991) Soils of Zimbabwe. Nehanda publications, Harare, p 35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofor MO, Ibeawuchi II (2010) Sun-drying—a low cost technology for reducing postharvest losses. Academia Arena 2(1):56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Osunde ZD (2008) Minimizing postharvest losses in yam (Dioscorea spp.): treatments and techniques. In Robertson GL, Lupien JR (eds) Using food science and technology to improve nutrition and promote national development. International Union of Food Science and Technology, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent SA, Ritenour MA, Brecht JK (2000) Handling, cooling and sanitation techniques for maintaining postharvest quality. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, pp 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson S (1997) Adaptive sampling in behavioural surveys, NIDA Research Monograph. National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, pp 296–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman M (2009) Reducing postharvest food losses through appropriate methods of preservation: an imperative for actualisation of millennium development goals by year 2015. Voice Teach 1(2):56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) Missing food: the case of postharvest grain losses in Sub-Saharan Africa. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, pp 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinyama LM, Campbell DJ, Matiza T (1991) Coping with food deficits in rural Zimbabwe: the sequential adoptions of indigenous strategies. Res Rural Sociol Dev 5:23–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Marambanyika .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marambanyika, T., Mutekwa, T., Kusena, W. (2014). Adoption and Utilization of Ethno-postharvest Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in Semi-arid Regions of Zimbabwe: Case of Buhera District. In: Behnassi, M., Shahid, S., Mintz-Habib, N. (eds) Science, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics