Advertisement

Innovation Ecosystems in Brazil: Promoting Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability

Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Business Ethics Research book series (ABER, volume 5)

Abstract

We highlight cases of organizations that promote social entrepreneurship and sustainability in Brazil through initiatives that support the ecosystem of innovation. An innovation ecosystem comprises not only the core innovator, but also stakeholders including suppliers, customers, and organizations that develop the infrastructure or provide complementary services in different industries or communities. From the perspective of an innovation ecosystem, it is important to consider not only how an individual or organization solves innovation challenges, but also how this individual or organization interacts with stakeholders and organizational partners to stimulate innovation. The chapter focuses on two cases that showcase two sets of concerns: innovation and sustainability in the value chain; and social entrepreneurship and microfinance. These cases suggest that organizations supporting social innovation ecosystems can foster the startup and growth of social enterprises. These cases may serve as a guide for how other organizations can develop their own approaches to enrich their local innovation ecosystems. This chapter offers a novel approach to the understanding of social entrepreneurship in the context of an emerging economy by addressing the connection between innovation ecosystems and social entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Innovation ecosystem Social entrepreneurship Sustainability Brazil 

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., M. C. Boardman, and C. L McNeely. 2013. The social value of productive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 40 (3): 785–796.Google Scholar
  2. Adner, R. 2006. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review 84 (4): 98–107.Google Scholar
  3. Adner, R., and R. Kapoor. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal 31 (3): 306–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASMOCONP (Associacao dos Moradores do Conjunto Palmeiras) [Association of Residents of Conjunto Palmeiras]. 1998. Memoria de nossas lutas. 2 vols. [Memories of our endeavors. 2 vols.]. Fortaleza: ASMOCONP/Prorenda.Google Scholar
  5. Autio, E., and L. D. W. Thomas. 2013. Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management. In The Oxford handbook of innovation management, eds. M. Dodgson, N. Philips, and D. M. Gann, 204–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bayona, B., and K. Milani. 2011. The L3C low-profit limited liability company: Investment option for societal impact. Practical Tax Strategies 86 (2): 66–71.Google Scholar
  7. Bielefeld, W. 2009. Issues in social enterprise and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Affairs Education 15 (1): 69–86.Google Scholar
  8. Branco, P. D., A. M. Coelho, C. Fedato, G.D. Sanches, and M.P. Monzoni Neto 2012. Inovacao e Sustentabilidade na Cadeia de Valor: Ciclo 2012 Gestao de Fornecedores [Innovation and Sustainability in the Value Chain: 2012 Supply Management Cycle]. Centro de Estudos em Sustentabilidade, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo da Fundacao Getulio Vargas [Sao Paulo Business Administration School of Getulio Vargas Foundation]. http://gvces.com.br/arquivos/117/publicacao_iscv_ciclo2012.pdf.
  9. Christensen, C. M., and R. S Rosenbloom. 1995. Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy 24 (2): 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, A. D. 2010. Banco Palmas como uma plataforma de desenvolvimento comunitario [Palmas Bank as a platform for community development]. In Novos paradigmas de producao e consumo: experiencias inovadoras [New paradigms of production and consumption], eds. Morais, Leandro and Borges, Adriano. Sao Paulo: Instituto Polis.Google Scholar
  11. Dacin, P. A., M. T. Dacin, and M. Matear. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives 24 (3): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dees, J. G. 2001/1998. The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. http://web.mit.edu/sloan2/dese/readings/week01/Dees_TheMeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship.pdf.
  13. Di Domenico, M., H. Haugh, and P. Tracey. 2010. Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34 (4): 681–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FGV. 2012. Fundacao Getulio Vargas [Getulio Vargas Foundation]. http://portal.fgv.br.
  15. FGV-EAESP. 2012. Escola de Administração de Empresas de Sao Paulo da Fundacao Getulio Vargas [Sao Paulo Business Administration School of Getulio Vargas Foundation]. http://eaesp.fgvsp.br.
  16. Gawer, A., and M. A Cusumano. 2008. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review 49 (2): 28–35.Google Scholar
  17. GVces. 2012. Centro de Estudos em Sustentabilidade da Fundacao Getulio Vargas [Center for Sustainability Studies of Getulio Vargas Foundation]. http://fgv.br/ces.
  18. Haigh, N., and A. J Hoffman. 2012. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics 41 (2): 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iansiti, M., and R. Levien. 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review 82 (3): 68–78.Google Scholar
  20. IBGE. 2012. Estatisticas do cadastro central de empresas 2010 [2010 Statistics of the central registry of businesses]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica (IBGE) [Brazilian Insitute for Geografy and Statistics].Google Scholar
  21. IDES (Instituto para o Desenvolvimento e Investimento Social) [Institute for Social Development and Investment]. 2011. Perfil: Joaquim Melo, Um Empreendedor Social Que Atua Na Luta Pelo Desenvolvimento Comunitario (Profile: Joaquim Melo, a social entrepreneur dedicated to community development). http://www.idis.org.br/acontece/perfil-joaquim-melo-um-empreendedor-social-que-atua-na-luta-pelo-desenvolvimento-comunitario.
  22. Jarillo, J. C. 1988. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 9 (1): 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khavul, S. 2010. Microfinance: Creating opportunities for the poor? Academy Of Management Perspectives 24 (3): 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lampinen, M. 2011. Silicon Valley recognizes global startup ecosystem. Endeavor Global, Inc. http://www.endeavor.org/blog/silicon-valley-recognizes-global-startup-ecosystem.
  25. Lumpkin, G. T., T. W. Moss, D. M. Gras, S. Kato, and A. S Amezuca. 2013. Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different if at all? Small Business Economics 40 (3): 761–783.Google Scholar
  26. Maak, T., and N. Stoetter 2012. Social entrepreneurs as responsible leaders: ‘Fundacion paraguaya’ and the case of martin burt. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (3): 413–430.Google Scholar
  27. Mair, J., and I. Marti. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business 41 (1): 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melo, J. 2011. Um sonhador com os pes no chao [A dreamer with feets on the ground]. Revista Consciencia Ampla 3 (4): 3-5. http://www.ampla.com/media/199789/revista%20consci%C3%AAncia%20ampla%2010.pdf.
  29. Melo Neto Segundo, J. J., and S. Magalhaes 2009. Bancos comunitarios [Community banks]. Mercado de Trabalho 41:21–26. http://www.ipea.gov.br/sites/000/2/boletim_mercado_de_trabalho/mt41/10_Eco_Bancos.pdf.
  30. Minna, P. J., and N. B Corbin. 2010. Benefit corporation law could spur socially responsible business boom. The Daily Record. Baltimore: The Dolan Company.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, J. F. 1993. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71 (3): 75–86.Google Scholar
  32. Normann, R., and R. Ramirez. 1993. From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review 71 (4): 65–77.Google Scholar
  33. Palmas Institute for Development and Solidarity Economy [Instituto Palmas de Desenvolvimento e Socioeconomia Solidaria]. 2011. Relatorio 2010–2011 Instituto Palmas [Palmas Institute 2010-2011 Report]. Fortaleza: Palmas Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Santos, F. M. 2012. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (3): 335–351.Google Scholar
  35. Singer, P. 2009. Politicas publicas da Secretaria Nacional de Economia Solidaria do Ministerio do Trabalho e Emprego [Public policies of the National Office of Solidarity Economy of Brazil’s Ministry of Work and Employment]. Mercado de Trabalho 39:43–48.Google Scholar
  36. Stabell, C. B., and O. D Fjeldstad. 1998. Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Terpenoil 2012. http://terpenoil.com.br.
  38. Wincent, J., S. Anokhin, D. Ortqvist, and E. Autio. 2010. Quality meets structure: Generalized reciprocity and firm-level advantage in strategic networks. Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yin, R. K. 2005. Estudo de Caso [Case Study]. Sao Paulo: Bookman.Google Scholar
  40. Zacharakis, A. L., D. A. Shepherd, and J. E Coombs. 2003. The development of venture-capital-backed internet companies: An ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2): 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Palumbo Donahue School of BusinessDuquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Center for Sustainability StudiesFundacao Getulio VargasSao PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Business SchoolUniversidade Federal FluminenseRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations