Advertisement

Fragility Function Manager Tool

  • Vitor Silva
  • Helen Crowley
  • Miriam Colombi
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 27)

Abstract

This chapter describes the SYNER-G Fragility Function Manager, which has been developed to store, visualize and manage a large number of fragility function sets. The tool can store functions for a wide range of elements at risk, and has features that allow these functions to be harmonized (in terms of intensity measure type and limit state) and then compared. The tool is provided, together with a collection of European fragility functions, as an electronic supplement to this book.

Keywords

Ground Motion Limit State Peak Ground Acceleration Spectral Acceleration Site Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bommer JJ, Alarcon JE (2006) The prediction and use of peak ground velocity. J Earthq Eng 10(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  3. Crowley H, Pinho R (2004) Period-height relationship for existing European reinforced concrete buildings. J Earthq Eng 8:93–119Google Scholar
  4. Crowley H, Colombi M, Silva V, Ahmad N, Fardis M, Tsionis G, Papailia A, Taucer F, Hancilar U, Yakut A, Erberik MA (2011a) D3.1. Fragility functions for common RC building types in Europe, SYNER-G Deliverable 3.1. Available from URL: http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/files/dissemination/deliverables.html
  5. Crowley H, Colombi M, Silva V, Ahmad N, Fardis M, Tsionis G, Karatoni T, Lyrantazaki F, Taucer F, Hancilar U, Yakut A, Erberik MA (2011b) D3.2. Fragility functions for common masonry building types in Europe, SYNER-G Deliverable 3.2. Available from URL: http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/files/dissemination/deliverables.html
  6. Crowley H, Colombi M, Silva V, Monteiro R, Ozcebe S, Fardis M, Tsionis G, Askouni P (2013) D3.6. Fragility functions for roadway bridges, SYNER-G Deliverable 3.6. Available from URL: http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/files/dissemination/deliverables.html
  7. Cua G, Wald DT, Allen TI, Garcia D, Worden CB, Gerstenberger M, Lin K, Marano K (2010)Best Practises” for using macroseismic intensity and ground motion-intensity conversion equations for hazard and loss models in GEM1. GEM technical report 2010-4, GEM Foundation, Pavia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  8. Faenza L, Michelini A (2010) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophys J Int 180:113–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goel RK, Chopra AK (1997) Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. ASCE 123(11):1454–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Code Council (2006) 2006 International Building Code (IBC-2006), United StatesGoogle Scholar
  11. Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murphy JR, O’Brien LJ (1977) The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67(3):877–915Google Scholar
  13. Silva V, Crowley H, Pagani M, Monelli D, Pinho R (2013) Development of the OpenQuake engine, the Global Earthquake Model’s open-source software for seismic risk assessment. Nat Hazards. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0618-x Google Scholar
  14. Sorensen MB, Stromeyer D and Grunthal G (2008) Estimation of macroseismic intensity – new attenuation and intensity vs. ground motion relations for different parts of Europe. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  15. Tselentis GA, Danciu L (2008) Empirical relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity and engineering ground-motion parameters in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(4):1863–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton T, Kanamori H, Scrivner CW, Worden BC (1999a) TriNet “Shakemaps”: rapid generation of peak ground-motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthquake Spectra 15:537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton T, Kanamori H (1999b) Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15:557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)PaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations