Skip to main content

Abstract

Hospitals belong to the so-called “complex-social” systems since they depend on several components of different nature to function properly and they provide a societal service to citizens. The basic components of a hospital are: the staff, the organization and the facility. They jointly “contribute” to provide medical care to patients. This chapter focus on the seismic assessment of the facility. A hospital has to be capable of providing medical after the occurrence of a major earthquake; hence the facility target performance is set as operational. Such a performance depends on the response of both structural and non-structural elements. Fragility curves for “typical” non-structural elements are provided. A probabilistic-based procedure for the evaluation of the fragility curve of the facility is then derived. Finally, an index adequate to measure the performance of the hospital under emergency condition is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander D (1996) The health effects of earthquakes in the mid-1990s. Disasters 20(3):231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badillo H, Whittaker AS, Reinhorn AM (2003) Performance characterization of suspended ceiling systems. ATC-29-2, Redwood City, CA, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW, Cornell CA (2005) A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1193–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bea R (2003) Lecture notes of CE290A. University of Berkeley, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr RA, Worrel CL (1998) Limits states for architectural glass under simulated seismic loadings. ATC 29-1, Redwood City, CA, pp 229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwkamp JG, Meehan JF (1960) Drift limitations imposed by glass. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo/Kyoto, Japan, , vol III, pp 1763–1778

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: design provision for earthquake resistance of structures, Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, EN 1998–2004

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn A, Spence R (1992) Earthquake protection. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JM (1995) Seismic performance of cladding: responsibility revisited. J Perform Constr Facil ASCE 9(4):254–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer J, Brismar B, Eldar R, Rutherford WH (1989) The medical severity index of disasters. J Emerg Med 7(3):269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidenger J, Goettel K (1998) The benefits and costs of seismic retrofits of nonstructural components for hospital, essential facilities, and schools. ATC 29-1, Redwood City, CA, pp 491–504

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 74 (1994) Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage. Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 74, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • fib (2003) Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforce concrete buildings. Federation internationale du beton, State-of-the-art report prepared by Task Group 7.1, Bulletin 24, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SA (1977) Racking tests of high-rise building partitions. J Struct Div ASCE 103(ST8):1673–1685

    Google Scholar 

  • Gann RG, Riley MA, Repp JM, Whittaker AS, Reinhorn AM, Hough PA (2005) Reaction of ceiling tile systems to shocks (Draft). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) NCSTAR 1-5D

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardoni P, Mosalam KM, Der Kiureghian A (2003) Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges. J Earthq Eng 7(SI1):79–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriu M, Waisman F (1988) Seismic reliability and performance of non-structural components. In: Proceedings of seminar on seismic design, retrofit and performance of nonstructural components, ATC 29-1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Cornell CA (2005) Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthq Spectra 21(3):685–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalsky MJ, Priestley MJN (2000) Improved analytical model for shear strength of circular reinforced concrete columns in seismic regions. ACI Struct J 97(3):388–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwata Y, Takada S (2003) Seismic risk assessment and upgrade strategy of hospital lifeline performance. In: Proceedings of technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering, ASCE, Long Beach, CA, pp 82–91

    Google Scholar 

  • LESSLOSS (2005) Practical methods for structure-specific probabilistic seismic risk assessment. LESSLOSS Risk Mitigation for Earthquake and Landslides, Integrated Project, Deliverable 74

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupoi G, Franchin P, Lupoi A, Pinto PE (2005) Seismic fragility analysis of structural systems. ASCE J Eng Mech 132(4):385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupoi G, Franchin P, Lupoi A, Pinto PE, Calvi GM (2008) Probabilistic seismic assessment for hospitals and complex-social systems. Rose School Technical Report 2008/02,.IUSSPress, Pavia. ISBN 978-88-6198-017-4

    Google Scholar 

  • NIBS (2004) HAZUS: Hazard US: earthquake loss estimation methodology. National Institute of Building Sciences, NIBS document 5200-03, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuti C, Vanzi I (1998) Assessment of post-earthquake availability of hospital system and upgrading strategies. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27(12):1403–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuti C, Santini S, Vanzi I (1999) Seismic risk of Italian hospitals. In: Proceedings of workshop on design and retrofitting of hospitals in seismic areas, Florence, Italy, 21–22 Oct 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • PAHO (1995) Establishing a mass-casualty management system. Pan American Health Organisation/World Health Organisation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • PAHO (2000) Natural disasters – protecting the public’s health. Pan American Health Organisation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • PAHO/WHO (2000) Principles of disaster mitigation in health facilities. Pan American Health Organisation/World Health Organisation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotakos T, Fardis MN (2001) Deformation of R.C. members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Struct J 98(2):135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon N (1991) Safety culture and risk management in organisations. J Cross Cult Psychol 22:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto PE, Giannini R, Franchin P (2004) Seismic reliability analysis of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter K, Johnson GS, Zadeh MM, Scawthorn CR, Eder SJ (1993) Seismic vulnerability of equipment in critical facilities: life-safety and operational consequences. Technical Report NCEER-93-0022

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez M, Peek-Asa C (2005) Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes. Epidemiol Rev 27:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihal SS (1982) Behaviour of nonstructural building partitions during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of 7th symposium on earthquake engineering, Department of Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorke, Roorke, India, 10–12 Nov 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M (2001) Seismic risk assessment of non-structural components in hospitals. FEMA/USC Hospital Report No. 4, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoaf K, Selingson H, Peek-Asa C, Giangreco MM (2000) Standardized injury categorization schemes for earthquake related injuries. Produced for the National Science Foundation by the UCLA Center for Public Health and Disaster Relief, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez LE, Singh MP (2000) Review of earthquake performance, seismic code, and dynamic analysis of elevators. Earthq Spectra 16(4):853–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan SW, Kassawara R (1998) The use of earthquake experience data for estimates of the seismic fragility of standard industrial equipment. ATC 29-1, Redwood City, CA, pp 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao GC (2000) Seismic performance of suspended ceiling systems. J Archit Eng 6(1):6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Lupoi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lupoi, A., Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P. (2014). Component Fragilities and System Performance of Health Care Facilities. In: Pitilakis, K., Crowley, H., Kaynia, A. (eds) SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics