Abstract
Technology Assessment (TA) emerged in the 1970s as a research-based policy-advising activity. During the 1980s, TA discovered technology development at the lab level as a subject of interest, reflection, and intervention. Since that time, TA as orientation for shaping new technology and innovation has been part of the overall TA portfolio. TA concepts and approaches to early engagement have been developed in different frameworks, e.g. as Constructive TA. In the last 10 years, a new wave of early engagement in TA occurred mainly in the field of new and emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, enhancement technologies, and synthetic biology. This wave led to many activities involving TA in early stages of development. In this chapter, we describe the most relevant approaches in TA aiming at early engagement. A deeper look will be presented into conceptual backgrounds that are specifically relevant to early engagement, such as concepts of technology determinism, social constructivism, and co-evolution. As a case study, we discuss an ongoing activity at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) where a major technological development in the field of new cement is accompanied by systems analysis and innovation research from its very beginning. This case allows specifically for discussing chances and opportunities of early engagement but also pitfalls and obstacles.
Keywords
- Technology Assessment
- Ordinary Portland Cement
- Cement Industry
- Responsible Innovation
- Technology Determinism
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Achternbosch, M., Bräutigam, K.-R., Hartlieb, N., Kupsch, C., Richers, U., & Stemmermann, P. (2005). Impact of the use of waste on trace element concentrations in cement and concrete. Waste Management and Research, 23(2005), 328–337.
Achternbosch, M., Kupsch, C., Nieke, E., & Sardemann, G. (2011a). Klimaschonende Produktion von Zement: eine Utopie? GAIA, 20(1), 31–40.
Achternbosch, M., Kupsch, Chr., Nieke, E., & Sardemann, G. (2011b). Sind “Green Cements” die Zukunft? Erste systemanalytische Abschätzungen zu innovativen Bindemitteln. Teil 1: Novacem. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing. (KIT Scientific Reports 7589).
Bechmann, G., Decker, M., Fiedeler, U., & Krings, B.-J. (2007). Technology assessment in a complex world. International Journal on Foresight and Innovation Policy, 3, 6–27.
Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1994). Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bimber, B. A. (1996). The politics of expertise in congress: The rise and fall of the office of technology assessment. New York: State University of New York Press.
Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menendez, L. (2004). Politics and institutions: European parliamentary technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 27, 79–96.
Decker, M., & Ladikas, M. (Eds.). (2004). Bridges between science, society and policy. Technology assessment – methods and impacts. Berlin: Springer.
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). The emergence of post-normal science. In R. von Schomberg (Ed.), Science, politics and morality. London: Sage.
Grin, J., & Grunwald, A. (Eds.). (2000). Vision assessment: Shaping technology in 21st century society. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Grunwald, A. (2007). Converging technologies: Visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation. Futures, 39(4), 380–392.
Grunwald, A. (2009a). Technology assessment: Concepts and methods. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 1103–1146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Grunwald, A. (2009b). Vision assessment supporting the governance of knowledge – the case of futuristic nanotechnology. In G. Bechmann, V. Gorokhov, & N. Stehr (Eds.), The social integration of science. Institutional and epistemological aspects of the transformation of knowledge in modern society (pp. 147–170). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Grunwald, A. (2010a). Technikfolgenabschätzung – eine Einführung. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Grunwald, A. (2010b). From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. NanoEthics, 4(2), 91–101.
Grunwald, A. (2012). Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In Proceedings of the responsible innovation conference, The Hague, Apr 2011 (to appear).
Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Culture, 24, 93–109.
Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society. Boston: Beacon Press. First publication: Habermas, J. (Ed.). (1968). Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Joss, S., & Belucci, S. (Eds.). (2002). Participatory technology assessment – European perspectives. London: University of Westminster.
Luhmann, H. J. (2009). CO2-Abscheidung und -Lagerung bei Kohlekraftwerken: kein Beitrag zur Lösung des Klimaproblems. GAIA, 18(4), 294–299.
National Research Council. (2006). A matter of size: Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Rip, A. (2007). Die Verzahnung von technologischen und sozialen Determinismen und die Ambivalenzen von Handlungsträgerschaft im ‘Constructive Technology Assessment’. In U. Dolata & R. Werle (Eds.), Gesellschaft und die Macht der Technik. Sozioökonomischer und institutioneller Wandel durch Technisierung (pp. 83–106). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.
Rip, A., & Swierstra, T. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics, 1, 3–20.
Rip, A., Misa, T., & Schot, J. (Eds.). (1995). Managing technology in society. London: Pinter Publishers.
Schepelmann, P., Ritthoff, M., Jeswani, H., Azapagic, A., & Suomalainen, K. (2009). Options for deepening and broadening LCA. CALCAS – Co-ordination Action for innovation in Life-Cycle Analysis for Sustainability. Brussels et al. European Commission.
Siune, K., Markus, E., Calloni, M., Felt, U., Gorski, A., Grunwald, A., Rip, A., Semir, V. de, & Wyatt, S. (2009). Challenging futures of science in society (Report of the MASIS Expert Group). Brussels.
Van de Poel, I. (2009). Values in engineering design. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 973–1006). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
VDI – Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1991). Richtlinie 3780 Technikbewertung, Begriffe und Grundlagen. Düsseldorf. Available also in English at www.vdi.de
Von Schomberg, R. (Ed.). (1999). Democratizing technology. Theory and practice of a deliberative technology policy. Hengelo: ICHPA.
Von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in the 21st century: The quest for the “right” impacts of science and technology. An outlook towards a framework for responsible research and innovation. To appear In M. Dusseldorp, et al. (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Yoshinaka, Y., Clausen, C., & Hansen, A. (2003). The social shaping of technology: A new space for politics? In A. Grunwald (Ed.), Technikgestaltung zwischen Wunsch oder Wirklichkeit (pp. 117–138). Berlin: Springer.
Yoshizawa, G. (2012). Third generation of technology assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 4S Annual Meeting – Abstract and Session Submissions, Komaba I Campus, Tokyo, Japan. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p422007_index.html. Download 15 July 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grunwald, A., Achternbosch, M. (2013). Technology Assessment and Approaches to Early Engagement. In: Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., van de Poel, I., Gorman, M. (eds) Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7843-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7844-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)