The View from Within and the View from Above: Looking at van Fraassen’s Perrin

Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 368)

Abstract

Bas van Fraassen has usefully contrasted two ways to view the relation between theory and measurement: from above and from within. Roughly put, “from above” is the perspective in which we view measurements from the point of view of the finished theory aiming to examine how the measurement is related to the theory. “From within” is the perspective in which we see measurement as a means for the development of the theory. van Fraassen warns us that we need a “synoptic vision,” one that combines both perspectives. In this chapter, I argue that this synoptic view can be had without forfeiting important conclusions about how theory and experience and observation are related to reality. I make my case by looking in detail into an important episode in which the two views should clearly be in play: Perrin’s work on the Brownian motion. This case has been recently studied by van Fraassen too. There are significant elements of disagreement in the ways we look at this case. I argue that Perrin’s case shows that it is unreasonable to defend the superiority of the molecular theory c. 1912 without defending its likely truth. There is an important point of contact with van Fraassen: we both take measurement to be a vehicle of representation. But we disagree on the role of instruments as means for representation. After having presented my own way to bring together the view from within and the view from above in Perrin’s case, I take issue with his account of instrument-driven measurement as a case of public hallucinations.

Keywords

van Fraassen Perrin Brownian motion Representation Atomism Confirmation 

References

  1. Bigg, C. (2008). Evident atoms: Visuality in Jean Perrin’s Brownian motion research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 39, 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borel, E. (1914). Le Hasard (2nd ed., 1920). Paris: Librairie Félix Arcan.Google Scholar
  3. Brush, S. (1968). A history of random processes. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 51, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Broglie, L. (1945). La Réalité Des Molécules et L’Œuvre de Jean Perrin (Académie des Sciences). Paris: Gauthiers-Villars.Google Scholar
  5. Einstein, A. (1905 [1956]). On the movement of small particles suspended in a stationary liquid demanded by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat. In R. Furth (Ed.), Investigation on the theory of the Brownian movement (pp. 1–18). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Glymour, C. (1975). Relevant evidence. The Journal of Philosophy, 72, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gouy, L. (1895). Le Mouvement Brownien et les Mouvement Moléculaires. Revue Générale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées, 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
  8. Meyerson, E. (1912 [1930]). Identity and reality (K. Loewenberg, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Nye, M. J. (1972). Molecular reality: A perspective on the scientific work of Jean Perrin. London: MacDonald.Google Scholar
  10. Nye, M. J. (1976). The nineteenth-century atomic debates and the dilemma of an indifferent hypothesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 7, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostwald, W. (1896). The failure of scientific materialism. Popular Monthly, 98, 589–601.Google Scholar
  12. Ostwald, W. (1907). The modern theory of energetics. The Monist, 17, 481–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ostwald, W. (1912). Outlines of general chemistry (3rd ed., W. W. Taylor, Trans.) London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  14. Perrin, J. (1901). Les hypothèses moléculaires. Revue Scientifique, 15, 449–461.Google Scholar
  15. Perrin, J. (1903). Traité de Chimie Physique: Les Principes. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  16. Perrin, J. (1910a). Brownian movement and molecular reality. (F. Soddy, Trans.). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Perrin, J. (1910b). Le Mouvement Brownien. Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, 10(4), 265–302. Séances du 27 Janvier et du 3 Mars 1910. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  18. Perrin, J. (1911). La Réalité des Molécules. Revue Scientifique, 25, 774–784.Google Scholar
  19. Perrin, J. (1912). Les Preuves de la Réalité Moléculaire (Etudes Spécial des Emulsions). In P. Langevin & L. de Broglie (Eds.), La Théorie Du Rayonnement et les Quanta (pp. 153–253). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  20. Perrin, J. (1916). Atoms. (D. L. Hammick, Trans.). London: Constable and Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Poincaré, H. (1900). Les Relations Entre la Physique Expérimentale et la Physique Mathématique. In C.-E. Guillaume & H. Poincaré (Eds.), Rapports Présentés au Congrés International de Physique de 1900 (Vol. 1, pp. 1–29). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  22. Poincaré, H. (1906). The principles of mathematical physics. In H. J. Roberts (Ed.), St Lewis International Congress of Arts and Science (pp. 604–622). London: University Alliance.Google Scholar
  23. Poincaré, H. (1913). Mathematics and science: Last essays. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  24. Post, H. R. (1968). Atomism 1900 I & II. Physics Education, 3, 225–232 and 307–312.Google Scholar
  25. Psillos, S. (2011). Moving molecules above the scientific horizon: On Perrin’s case for realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42, 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomson, W. (1870). On the size of atoms. Nature, 1, 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van Fraassen, B. (2008). Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Fraassen, B. (2009). The perils of Perrin, in the hands of philosophers. Philosophical Studies, 143, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weyl, H. (1927 [1963]). Philosophy of mathematics and natural science. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and History of ScienceUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations