Skip to main content
Book cover

Gender, Lifespan and Quality of Life pp 249–262Cite as

Age and Gender Differences in Well-being in Croatia

Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS,volume 53)

Abstract

In the survey-based study we examined the age and gender differences in personal and national well-being of Croatian citizens. A representative sample of 4,000 citizens participated in the study. Two subscales of International Well-being Index (IWI) were administered: Personal Well-being Index (PWI: satisfaction with material status, health, achievement, relationships, safety, community, future security, spirituality) and National Well-being Index (NWI: satisfaction with economy, environment, social conditions, government, business, national security).

Among personal life domains, both men and women were the most satisfied with their relationships with family and friends, and with acceptance by the community, while they were the least satisfied with their material status and future security. Among national life domains, the highest ratings were obtained for the state of the natural environment, while the government and economic situation were the least satisfying national domains for both groups.

Univariate analyses of gender differences in satisfaction with specific life domains and overall well-being indexes revealed certain gender differences. Men reported higher satisfaction with national well-being as well as with some of the personal life domains than women. However, the gender differences in overall national well-being index were not significant when income was taken into account,

Group comparisons by age showed general trend of decline in personal well-being with age. Age differences in Croatian citizens’ well-being were more pronounced than gender differences. As expected, research has confirmed that income plays an important role in well-being of citizens, whereby the role of income is much greater when the relationship between age and well-being is examined, than it is the case in the relationship between well-being and gender.

Possible explanations of the obtained results are provided and some future policy interventions are considered.

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Wellbeing
  • Croatia
  • Age differences

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7829-0_15
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-7829-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 15.1
Fig. 15.2
Fig. 15.3
Fig. 15.4

References

  • Anderson, R., Dubois, H., Leončikas, T., & Sandor, E. (2012). Eurofound 2012. Third European quality of life survey—quality of life in Europe: Impact of crisis. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akashi, R. K. (2012). Psychological well-being among three age groups of older Americans living in the community (Dissertation, Columbia University). http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac%3A143067. Accessed 15 Dec 2012.

  • Babarovic, T., Cilic Burusic, L., & Burusic, J. (2011). Who are the supporters of Croatian membership in the European Union and NATO?—predictive value of personal and national well-being. Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 71–80. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9723-3.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baetschmann, G. (2011). Heterogeneity in the relationship between happiness and age: Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel (Working Paper No. 47). University of Zurich, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Gonzalez, M., Figuer, C., & Malo, S. (2009). Satisfaction with spirituality, satisfaction with religion and personal well-being among Spanish adolescents and young university students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4, 23–45. doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9066-x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2009). Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai city, South China: A public survey using the International Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 91, 243–258. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9280-1.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • CBS. (2009). Women and men in Croatia. Zagreb: Central Bureau of Statistics of Republic of Croatia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2002). International Wellbeing Index, Version 2. http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/inter_wellbeing/Index-CoreItemsDraft2.doc.

  • Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190. doi:10.1023/A:1024704320683.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health and wellbeing around the world: Evidence from Gallup World Pull. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72. doi:10.1257/jep.22.2.53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyde & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 463–473). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money. Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, A., & Lawson, R. (2012). Subjective well-being and its influence on consumer sentiment towards marketing: A New Zealand example. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 149–166. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9255-9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, M., Coenders, G., Saez, M., & Casa, F. (2010). Non-linearity, complexity and limited measurement in the relationship between satisfaction with specific life domains and satisfaction with life as a whole. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 335–352. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9143-8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Gender and well-being around the world. Global Economy and Development at Brookings. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/8/08%20gender%20well%20being%20graham/08%20gender%20and%20well%20being%20graham.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.

  • Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Mayraz, G., Hidajat, M., Lindenberger, U., Wagner, G. J., & Schupp, J. (2010). Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the UK, and the US: Something is seriously wrong at the end of life. SOEP Papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, DIW Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guriev, S., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2009). (Un)Happiness in transition. Journal of Economic Progress, 23(2), 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., & Slagsvold, B. (2012). The age and subjective well-being paradox revisited: A multidimensional perspective. Norsk Epidemiologi, 22(2), 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender, aging and subjective well-being. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(3–5), 391–408. doi:10.1177/002071520204300309.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index (4th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.

  • Kaliterna, Lj., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2006). What makes Croats happy?—Predictors of happiness in representative sample. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), Dimensions of well-being (pp. 53–60). Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliterna, Lj., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2007). Importance and satisfaction with life domains in Croatia. In R. J. Estes (Ed.), Advancing quality of life in a turbulent world (pp. 189–208). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliterna, Lj., Brkljacic, T., & Sakic, V. (2007). Monthly income and subjective well-being in Croatian citizens. Croatian Medical Journal, 48(5), 727–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliterna, Lj., Prizmic-Larsen, Z., & Brkljacic, T. (2011). Međunarodni indeks dobrobiti—podaci za Hrvatsku. [International well-being index−results for Croatia.] [In Croatian.] In G. Vuletic (Ed.), Kvaliteta zivota i zdravlje (pp. 41–51). Osijek: University of Osijek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300. doi:10.1007/s10902005-7226-8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2001). Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age. A meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 56(4), 195–213. doi:10.1093/geronb/56.4.P195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plangol, A. C., & Easterlin, R. A. (2008). Aspirations, attainments, and satisfaction: Life cycle differences between American women and men. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 601–619. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9106-5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, D., Pfaffenberger, N., Platter, M., Mitmansgruber, H., Cummins, R. A., & Höfer, S. (2009). International Well-being Index: The Austrian version. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 243–256. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9255-2.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tesch-Romer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85, 329–349. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9133-3.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tiliouine, H. (2009). Health and subjective wellbeing in Algeria: A developing country in transition. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2), 223–238. doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9073-y.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R. A., & Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: The case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75, 1–30. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-2012-2.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tonon, G. (2011). Quality of life in Argentina. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 547–554). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troldahl, V. C., & Carter. R. E., Jr. (1964). Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 71–76.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. (2009). Subjective well-being on the Tibet Plateau: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 753–768. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9120-7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wills-Herrera, E., Islam, G., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Subjective well-being in cities: A multidimensional concept of individual, social and cultural variables. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4, 201–221. doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9072-z.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yiengprugsawan, V., Seubsman, S., Khammam, S., Lim, L. L. Y., & Sleigh, A. C. (2010). Personal Well-being Index in a national cohort of 87,134 Thai adults. Social Indicators Research, 98(2), 201–216. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9542-6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi, A. A., & Sharif, N. (2010). Stress and personal well-being among a sample of Iranian disabled veterans’s wives. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 5(2), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences, Marulicev trg 19, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia

    Dr. Ljiljana Kaliterna & Josip Burusic

Authors
  1. Dr. Ljiljana Kaliterna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Josip Burusic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ljiljana Kaliterna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

    Elizabeth Eckermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaliterna, L., Burusic, J. (2014). Age and Gender Differences in Well-being in Croatia. In: Eckermann, E. (eds) Gender, Lifespan and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7829-0_15

Download citation