Abstract
The last several decades have witnessed major changes in gender roles and family patterns, as well as a falling birth rate in Ireland and the rest of Europe. These have included an increase in cohabitation, postponement of marriage, an increased likelihood of remaining single and delayed fertility. However the reasons why people are making these choices are not fully understood and it is also not clear if these choices are leading to greater well-being. The present study explored people’s attitudes to family formation in the context of changes in gender role attitudes and behaviour and the changing nature of the family. The study was based on a nationwide sample of 1,404 people in the childbearing age group (aged 20–49) in the Republic of Ireland. Results showed strong support for women’s economic independence and maternal employment. Yet the findings also suggested that women’s success in the workplace may come at a personal price, with many women fearing there will be a personal backlash to their success. There was evidence that delays in couple formation were contributing to a smaller window of opportunity for women to have children and this is contributing to the fall in the birth rate. Being married was found to be associated with the greatest overall well-being, cohabiting with the next highest and being single with the lowest level of well-being. In view of the increasing proportion of single people in the population, policy needs to address itself to increasing the social integration of this group.
This paper is based on the results of a larger study of “Changing Gender Role Attitudes and Behaviour: Implications for Family Formation in Ireland,” supported by the Family Support Agency, Ireland. The support of the Agency is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Family Support Agency. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies (ISQOLS), Università Cà Foscari, Venice, 1–4 November 2012.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R., Branislav, M., Vermeylen, G., Lyly-Yrjanainen, M., & Zigante, V. (2009). Second European quality of life survey. Dublin: Eurofound.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization. London: Sage.
Castles, F. G. (2003). The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 209–227.
Central Statistics Office (CSO) (1999). Population and labour force projections: 2001–2031. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Central Statistics Office (CSO) (2007). Census 2006: Principal demographic results. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74(2), 609–634.
Coombs, R. H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: A literature review. Family Relations, 40, 97–102.
Craven, F. (2010). A comparison of the social, religious, and gender role attitudes of Catholic and Protestant women in the Republic of Ireland. Lewiston, Lampeter and Queenston: Edwin Mellen.
D’Addio, A. C., & Mira d’Ercole, M. (2005). Trends and determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries: The role of policies OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers: No. 27. Paris: OECD.
Drew, E. (1998). Re-conceptualising families. In: E. Drew, R. Emerek & E. Mahon (Eds.), Women, work and the family in Europe (pp. 11–26). London: Routledge.
Drew, E., Humphreys, P., & Murphy, C. (2003). Off the treadmill: Achieving work–life balance. Dublin: National Framework Committee for the Development of Family Friendly Policies.
Eurostat. (2006). Population statistics. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Fagnani, J. (2008). The future of integrated family policy—the long-term prospects: 2025/30. Scoping Paper, Advisory Unit to the Secretary-General, International Futures Programme, OECD, Paris.
Fahey, T., & Field, C. A. (2008). Families in Ireland: An analysis of patterns and trends. Dublin: TSO.
Family Support Agency (2005). Submission to the All Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution. Dublin: Family Support Agency.
Ferriter, D. (2009). Occasions of sin: Sex and society in modern Ireland. Dublin: Profile Books.
Fine-Davis, M. (1976). Structure, determinants and correlates of attitudes toward the role and status of women in Ireland with particular reference to employment status of married women. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Trinity College Dublin
Fine-Davis, M. (1979). Social–psychological predictors of employment status of married women in Ireland. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(1), 145–158.
Fine-Davis, M. (1983a). Women and work in Ireland: A social psychological perspective. Dublin: Council for the Status of Women.
Fine-Davis (1983b). Mothers’ attitudes toward child care and employment: A nationwide survey. In: Working party on child care facilities for working parents. Report to the Minister for Labour (pp. 73–168). Dublin: Stationery Office.
Fine-Davis, M. (1988). Changing gender role attitudes in Ireland: 1975–1986: Vol. I. Attitudes toward the role and status of women, 1975–1986. In First Report of the Second Joint Oireachtas Committee on Women’s Rights (Pl. 5609). Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Fine-Davis, M. (in preparation). Attitudes to gender roles and policy issues in Ireland: 1975–2005.
Fine-Davis, M., Fagnani, J., Giovannini, D., Hojgaard, L., & Clarke, H. (2004). Fathers and mothers: Dilemmas of the work–life balance—A comparative study in four European countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fine-Davis, M., McCarthy, M., Edge, G., & O’Dwyer, C. (2005). Work–life balance and social inclusion in Ireland: Results of a nationwide survey. Dublin: National Flexi-Work Partnership. (Centre for Gender and Women’s Studies, Trinity College Dublin; IBEC; ICTU; FÁS, Age Action Ireland and Aware).
Fine-Davis, M., Craven, F., McCarthy, M., Holzworth, A., & O’Sullivan, M. (2007). An evaluation of the FÁS Initiative for women in receipt of the one parent family payment. Dublin: FÁS and Social Attitude and Policy Research Group, Trinity College.
Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization, politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gove, W. R. (1973). Sex, marital status and mortality. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 45–67.
Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Briggs Style, C. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(2), 12–131.
Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29(3), 349–374.
Hansen, T., Moum, T., & Shapiro, A. (2007). Relational and individual well-being among cohabitors and married individuals in midlife: Recent trends from Norway. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 910–933.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglis, T. (1987). Moral monopoly: Catholic Church in modern Irish society. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Inglis, T. (1998). Moral monopoly: The rise and fall of the Catholic Church in modern Ireland (2nd ed.). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter?: Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128–144.
Kennedy, F. (2001). From cottage to créche: Family change in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Kohler, H. P., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–680.
Lunn, P., Fahey, T., & Hannan, C. (2009). Family figures: Family dynamics and family types in Ireland, 1986–2006. Dublin: Family Support Agency.
McGinnity, F., & Russell, H. (2007). Work rich, time poor? Time use of women and men in Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 38(3), 323–354.
McKeown, K., Pratschke, J., & Haase, T. (2003). Family well-being: What makes a difference? Report to the Céifin Centre: Insights and Initiatives for a Changing Society, Town Hall, Shannon, Co. Clare.
Murphy-Lawless, J., Oakes, L., & Brady, C. (2004). Understanding how sexually active women think about fertility, sex and motherhood (Report No. 6). Dublin: Crisis Pregnancy Agency
Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage and trajectories in well-being and relationships. UC Los Angeles: California Center for Population Research. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/34f1h2nt. Accessed 11 Nov 2009.
National Women’s Council of Ireland. (2001). Creating opportunities … making choices. Women and work. Report from the NWCI Millennium Project.
NESC. (2009). Well-being matters: A social report for Ireland. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.
NESF. (2001). Lone parents (Forum Report No. 20). Dublin: The National Economic and Social Forum.
O’Connor, P. (1998). Emerging voices: Women in contemporary Irish society. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
OECD. (2003). Babies and bosses—Reconciling work and family life: Vol. 2. Austria, Ireland and Japan. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD. (2004). Education at a glance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD. (2009). Doing better for children. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Punch, A. (2007). Marriage, fertility and the family in Ireland—A statistical perspective. Presidential address from Central Statistics Office to the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, 31 May.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of America’s community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Redmond, J., Valiulis, M., & Drew, E. (2006). Literature review of issues related to work–life balance, workplace culture and maternity/childcare issues (Report No. 16). Dublin: Crisis Pregnancy Agency.
Sleebos, J. (2003). Low fertility rates in OECD countries: Facts and policy responses. (OECD labour market and social policy occasional papers, No. 15). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/568477207883.
Smyth, J. (2011) Average age of women giving birth is 31.4 years. Irish Times, 28 April, 3.
Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 527–536.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
van de Kaa, D. (2002). Is Low Fertility Post-Modern and Beyond the Action of Government? In: M. Macura and G. Beets (Eds). Dynamics of Fertility and Partnership in Europe: Insights and Lessons from Comparative Research – Volume I. U. N. Economic Commission for Europe, U. N. Population Fund. New York and Geneva: United Nations, pp. 13-16.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1979). Marital status and health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(2), 267–285.
Vikat, A., Beets, G., Billari, F., Buhler, C., Corijn, M., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., MacDonald, A. L., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A., Lolaz, A., Speder, Z. (2005). Wave I Questionnaire. Generations & Gender Programme, United Nations Commission for Europe, United Nations Population Fund. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Whelan, C. T., & Fahey, T. (1994). Marriage and the family. In C. T. Whelan (Ed.), Values and social change in Ireland (pp. 45–81). Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fine-Davis, M. (2014). Gender Role Attitudes, Family Formation and Well-being in Ireland. In: Eckermann, E. (eds) Gender, Lifespan and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7829-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7829-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7828-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7829-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)