Advertisement

Lesson Study in a Performative Culture

  • Julian Williams
  • Julie Ryan
  • Siân Morgan
Chapter
Part of the Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education book series (PROD, volume 10)

Abstract

Lesson study originated in Japan and is now becoming attractive worldwide as a research-based approach to developing teaching in the workplace. Like research, it is understood to be collectively constructed, but it is grounded in the practice, analysis and reflection of groups of teachers focused on real lessons collectively observed and analysed. We report two case studies of our lesson study work with primary and secondary teachers in England. The practice of lesson study is evolving as it disseminates globally, and the aim of this paper is to describe and analyse how lesson study can develop in a culture of performativity, where teacher professional learning in England is dominated by graded lesson observations and scrutinised in the light of national league tables. We theorise this performativity in social terms using the concept of commodification of knowledge and the use and exchange value of education. Our experience suggests that lesson study can pose an additional threat to teachers, but that they can find value in the professional learning derived from an appropriately evolved lesson study process in the workplace when that practice is able to focus on collaboration and make space free of competition and teacher-performance focused judgments. We discuss the potential for the profession to make such spaces for teaching to develop, and argue that resources from the wider community are essential for helping schools to build such spaces.

Keywords

Lesson Study League Table Head Teacher Cultural Script Teacher Professional Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education. (2011). ACME Position paper on early and multiple entry to GCSE mathematics. http://www.acme-uk.org/news/news-items-repository/2011/5/position-paper-on-early-and-mutiple-entry-to-gcse-mathematics. Accessed 10 Dec 2012
  3. Barrow, R. (1984). Giving teaching back to teachers: A critical introduction to curriculum theory. London: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Bartalo, D. B. (2012). Closing the teaching gap: Coaching for instructional leaders. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, A., Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (1992). Balanced assessment of mathematical performance. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 119–144). Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corcoran, D. (2011). Learning from lesson study: Power distribution in a community of practice. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Altogether (pp. 251–267). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Corey, D. L., Peterson, B. E., Merill Lewis, B., & Bukarau, J. (2010). Are there any places that students use their heads? Principles of high-quality Japanese mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 438–478.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, L. C., Alston, A., & Murata, A. (Eds.). (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. IEA. (2012). Trends in international mathematics and science study 2011. http://www.iea.nl/timss_2011.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  11. Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: RBS.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river. American Educator, 22(4), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mathematics Group at Maruyama. (2006) 3rd Grade Mathematics Lesson Plan: ‘Multiplication Algorithm (1)’ led by Hideyuki Muramoto, Sapporo City Maruyama Elementary School. http://hrd.apec.org/index.php/Multiplication_Algorithm_Grade_3_%28Japan%29#Lesson_Overview. Accessed 10 Dec 2012
  14. Pampaka, M., Williams, J. S., & Hutcheson, G. (2012a). Measuring students’ transition into university and its association with learning outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1041–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pampaka, M., Williams, J. S., Hutcheson, G., Wake, G., Black, L., Davis, P., & Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2012b). The association between mathematics pedagogy and learners’ dispositions for university study. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2012). Children’s argumentation in primary school mathematics: the use of models and tools to support reasoning and explanation. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, September 2012Google Scholar
  18. Schraw, G. (2002). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–16). Dordrect: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999/2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Closing the teaching gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 32–37.Google Scholar
  21. Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Sturman, L., Ruddock, G., Burge, B., Lin, Y., & Vappula, H. (2008). England’s achievement in TIMSS 2007: National report for England. Slough: NFERGoogle Scholar
  23. Wenger, E. (2009). Social learning capability: Four essays on innovation and learning in social systems. Social Innovation, Sociedade e Trabalho booklets, 12—separate supplement. Lisbon: MTSS/GEP & EQUALGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams, J. (2011). Audit and evaluation of pedagogy: Towards a cultural-historical perspective. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 161–178). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, J. (2012). Use and exchange value in mathematics education: Contemporary CHAT meets Bourdieu’s sociology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams, J., & Ryan, J. (2000). National testing and the improvement of classroom teaching: Can they coexist? British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams, J., & Ryan, J. (in press). Research, policy, and professional development: designing hybrid activities in third spaces. In V. Farnsworth & Y. Solomon (Eds.), What works in education? Bridging theory and practice in research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  3. 3.School of EducationThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations