Advertisement

Disentangling What it Means to be a Teacher in the Twenty-First Century: Policy and Practice in Teachers’ Continuing Professional Learning

  • Bob Burstow
  • Meg Maguire
Chapter
Part of the Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education book series (PROD, volume 10)

Abstract

The work of teachers has always been subjected to criticism and increasingly to the demands of government. So, if the economy ‘demands’ a different kind of workforce, then education, and by implication, teacher education, has to be changed to meet this requirement. In this chapter, we think about how these reforming attempts are to be understood, specifically in the case of teachers’ continuing professional learning. We begin by looking at continuing professional learning along three ‘axes’: the origin of the programmes, the beneficiaries of the programmes, and the implied view taken of the teachers in the construction and delivery of the programmes. Working from this base we will then develop and present a new tool for viewing the variety of major continuing professional learning programmes in England over the last 20 years. This reveals something of both New Labour’s and the Conservative Coalition’s attitude to teachers and teaching in the light of the policy approaches that were taken. The model developed here also has the potential to be a useful tool for any group wishing to take an informed approach to planning a continuing professional learning programme.

Keywords

Professional Development Teacher Education Professional Learning English Context Professional Learning Programme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012). Developing equitable education systems. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. (2010). Cambridge primary review briefings: The final report. Cambridge. www.primaryreview.org.uk/downloads/revised_2011–02/FINAL_REPORT_BRIEFING_REVISED_2_11.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2012.
  3. Al-Mutawa, N., & Al-Furaih, S. (2005). Evaluation of the in-service education and training programme for Kuwait army instructors. Journal of In-Service Education, 31, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. August, K., Brooks, R., Gilbert, C., Hancock, D., Hargreaves, D., Pearce, N., Roberts, J., Rose, J., & Wise, D. (2006). 2020 vision: Report of the teaching and learning in 2020 review group. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, J. (2007). Reluctant to be No 1. TES. www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=2332956. Accessed 18 Sept 2012.
  7. BBC (2012). EIS attacks SNP move to end chartered teacher scheme. BBC. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-16963545. Accessed 9 November 2012.
  8. Bird, M., Ding, S., Hanson, A., Leontovitsch, A., & McCartney, R. (2005). There is nothing as practical as a good theory: An examination of the outcomes of a ‘traditional’ MA in education for educational professionals. Journal of In-Service Education, 31, 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolam, R. (2000). Emerging policy trends: Some implications for continuing professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bottery, M., & Wright, N. (2000). Teachers and the state: Towards a directed profession. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Curriculum Journal, 15, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buie, E. (2009). Much can be achieved with a bit of TLC. Times Educational Supplement Scotland. 16 October 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Burstow, B. (2011). Initial teacher education: A consideration of tensions between schools, colleges and government. In I. M. Saleh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Teaching teachers. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Cordingley, P., & Bell, M. (2012). Understanding what enables high quality professional learning: A report on the research evidence. London: CUREE and Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Craft, A. (2000). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools. London, Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  16. Daly, C., Pachler, N., & Lambert, D. (2004). Teacher learning: Towards a professional academy. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DCSF. (2008). Being the best for our children: Releasing talent for teaching and learning. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Dean, J. (1991). Professional development in school. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. DES. (1944). The McNair report: Teachers and youth leaders. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  20. DES. (1994). Education Act 1994: Teacher training. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  21. DES. (1998). Teaching and higher education act 1998: Teaching profession and general teaching councils. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  22. DFE. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. London: DFE.Google Scholar
  23. DFE. (2012a). Teachers standards. London: DFE.Google Scholar
  24. DFE. (2012b). The teaching agency. London. www.education.gov.uk/aboutdfe/armslengthbodies/b0077806/the-teaching-agency. Accessed 21 Sept 2012.
  25. DFEE. (2001). Learning and teaching: A strategy for professional development. London: DFEE.Google Scholar
  26. Edwards, J.-A., & Eacott, J. (2008). The impact of masters level study on teachers’ professional development. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 28(3). Kings College, London.Google Scholar
  27. Glover, D., & Law, S. (1996). Managing professional development in education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  28. Goodson, I. F., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers professional lives. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  29. Gove, M. (2010). National College Annual Conference Speech. www.michaelgove.com/content/national_college_annual_conference. Accessed Oct 2010.
  30. Grieve, A. M., & McGinley, B. P. (2010). Enhancing professionalism? Teachers’ voices on continuing professional development in Scotland. Teaching Education, 21, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  32. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6, 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heilbron, R. (2010). Critical practice in teacher education: A study of professional learning. London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  34. House of Commons Education Committee. (2012). Great teachers: Attracting, training and retaining the best. Ninth Report of Session 2010–12. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  35. Hustler, D., McNamara, O., Jarvis, J., Londra, M., & Campbell, A. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions of continuing professional development. Report Brief: 429. Manchester: Manchester Metroplitan University.Google Scholar
  36. James Lord of Rosholme. (1972). The James report: Teacher education and training. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, M., & Hallgarten, J. (2000). From victims of change to agents of change: The future of the teaching profession. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, M., Stanley, G., MCNamara, O., & Murray, J. (2011). Facilitating teacher educators’ professional learning through a regional research capacity-building network. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kirk, G. (1988). Teacher education and professional development. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Koçoğlu, Z. (2011). Emotional intelligence and teacher efficacy: A study of Turkish EFL pre-service teachers. Teacher Development, 15, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Larsen, M. A. (2010). Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: A comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacBeath, J. (2009). Self evaluation: Background, principles and key learning. Nottingham: NCSL.Google Scholar
  43. McCormick, R., Banks, F., Morgan, B., Opfer, D., Pedder, D., Storey, A., & Wolfenden, F. (2008). Literature review report: Schools and continuing professional development (CPD) in England—State of the Nation research project (T34718). London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.Google Scholar
  44. McMahon, A. (1998). What teachers think of professional development. Professional Development Today, 2, 69–79.Google Scholar
  45. Nuffield, F. (2012). Welcome to Primary Science and SPACE. www.nuffieldfoundation.org/primary-science-and-space. Accessed 28 Sept 2012.
  46. Olson, J. (1992). Understanding teaching: Beyond expertise. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in education settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pedder, D., Storey, A., & Opfer, V. D. (2008). Schools and continuing professional development (CPD) in England—State of the Nation research project (T34718). London: TDA.Google Scholar
  49. Pitkeathly, J., Bolton, E., Barrow, J., & Campbell, D. (2004). New opportunities fund annual report: 2003/2004. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  50. Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Revell, P. (2002). Leading from the middle. Times Educational Supplement. http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=369100. Accessed 18 Sept 2012.
  52. Rose, J. (2009). The Rose report into primary education: Executive summary and conclusions. London: DCSF.Google Scholar
  53. Scott, H. (2012). Multiple student placements in one partner school. Shaping the learning of teachers: Innovations in school-led teacher education. Lancaster: TEAN, University of Cumbria.Google Scholar
  54. TDA. (2009). The national framework for masters in teaching and learning. Nottingham: Teacher Development Agency.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Tight but loose: A conceptual framework for scaling up school reforms. Chicago: American Educational Research Association (AERA).Google Scholar
  56. Toynbee, P., & Walker, D. (Sept 2012a). Cameron’s coalition: A government with ominous intent. The Guardian, 20, 6.Google Scholar
  57. Toynbee, P., & Walker, D. (2012b). Dogma and disarray: Cameron at half-time. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  58. Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher professionalism in new times. Journal of In-Service Education, 26, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiliam, D. (2012). Sustaining formative assessment with teacher learning communities. Kindle: Amazon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations