Skip to main content

Teaching as a Master’s Level Profession in Finland: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Workplace Learning in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education ((PROD,volume 10))

Abstract

In the Finnish teacher education system, teachers (in grades 1–12) pass a master’s degree in the university. In this chapter, the most important theoretical aspects that underpin the Finnish teacher education programmes are described and analysed, and we consider why it may be called research-based teacher education. The primary class pre-service teachers write their master’s thesis in ‘education’, while the secondary subject pre-service teachers write it in their ‘main subject’ within their own faculty (mathematics, physics, history, language, religion, etc.). Teacher education is considered from two perspectives or strata. The first deals with everyday practice and can be called a basic level of teacher education; the other stratum may be called a conceptual level of teacher education. An organising theme, a research-based approach, is applied as an integrative principle throughout the programme. It is built on evidence of research, teachers’ pedagogical thinking, and close theory-practice relation. University practice schools have an important role connecting practical experiences with theoretical studies. These schools and their teachers, mentors of student teaching at the same time, are specialised in teacher education and work closely with the supervisors of the university department. The system is supported with a model of peer-group mentoring in order to facilitate adaptation into the profession at the beginning of the career.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rezeptological approach: research on recipes and tips that the supervisors give and the pre-service teachers ask during their teaching practice.

References

  • Allison, C. B. (1995). Present and past. Essays for teachers in the history of education. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J. (1993). Theory and practice: Two fundamental categories in the philosophy of teacher education. Educational Review, 45(3), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J. (1995). What is reflection? On reflection in the teaching profession and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 1(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. (2000). A personal response to those who bash teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 358–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B. J., Good, T. L., & Goodson, I. F. (Eds.). (1997). International handbook of teachers and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1984). Teachers’ classroom decision-making. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Washington, D.C.: AERA and Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, D. J., & Demers, K. E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, D. (2005). Evidence-based medicine: A unified approach. Health Affairs, 24, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons, R. E. (1981). Making educational decisions. An introduction to philosophy of education. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (1994). The scientific status of research on teaching. Educational Theory, 44, 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galluzo, G. R., & Pankratz, R. S. (1990). Five attributes of a teacher education program knowledge base. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guhl, E., & Ott, E. H. (1985). Unterrichtsmetodisches Denken und Handeln. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handal, G., & Lauvås, P. (1987). Promoting reflective teaching. Supervision in practice. Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, H., Tynjälä, P., & Jokinen, H. (Eds.). (2012). Peer-group mentoring for teachers’ professional development. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howey, K. (1996). Designing coherent and effective teacher education programs. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 143–170). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytönen, J. (1995). The role of school practice in teacher education. In Kansanen (Ed.), Discussions on some educational issues VI (pp. 77–83). Research Report 145. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki (ED394958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland. Research in Educational Sciences, 25. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2007). Education as a societal contributor. Reflections by Finnish educationalists. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jyrhämä, R. (2006). The function of practical studies in teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland—Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Jyrhämä, R., & Syrjäläinen, E. (2011). ‘Good pal, wise dad and nagging wife’—and other views by teaching practice mentors. In A. Lauriala, R. Rajala, H. Ruokamo & O. Ylitapio-Mäntylä (Eds.), Navigating in educational contexts. Identities and cultures in dialogue (pp. 137–149). Rotterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestle, C. F. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Reseacher, 22(1), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P. (1991). Pedagogical thinking: The basic problem of teacher education. European Journal of Education, 26, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P. (2001). Using subjective pedagogical theories to enhance teacher education. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 29(3), 268–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P. (2004). The role of general education in teacher education. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 7(2), 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P. (2007). Research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as a societal contributor (pp. 131–146). Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P. (2010). HORRIBILE DICTU: The success story of the Finnish school system. In A. Liimets (Ed.), Denkkulturen. Selbstwerdung des Menschen. Erziehungskulturen (pp. 95–110). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen, P., Tirri, K., Meri, M., Krokfros, L., Husu, J., & Jyrhämä, R. (2000). Teachers’ pedagogical thinking: Theoretical landscapes, practical challenges. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindsvatter, R., Wilen, W., & Ishler, M. (1992). Dynamics of effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleven, T. A. (1991). Interactive teacher decision-making—still a basic skill? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, E. (1975). Theorie der Erziehungswissenschaft. Band 1. Wissenschaftstheoretische Richtungen der Pädagogik. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krokfors, L. (2007). Two-fold role of reflective pedagogical practise in research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as a societal contributor (pp. 147–159). Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (1997). How to succeed in school without really learning. The credentials race in American education. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maaranen, K. (2009). Practitioner research as part of professional development in initial teacher education. Teacher Development, 13(3), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maaranen, K. (2010). Teacher students’ MA Theses—A gateway to analytic thinking about teaching? A case study of Finnish primary school teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(5), 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCourt, F. (2005). Teacher man. A memoir. London: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H. (1980). Leitfaden zur Unterrichtsvorbereitung. Frankfurt am Main: Cornelsen Verlag Scriptor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.). (2012). The miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paschen, H., & Wigger, L. (Eds.). (1992). Pädagogisches Argumentieren. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penso, S., & Shoham, E. (2003). Student teachers’ reasoning while making pedagogical decisions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prange, K. (2008). Review of the book: Ricken, N. (2007). (Hrsg.). Über die Verachtung der Pädagogik. Analysen—Materialien—Perspektiven. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 54 (3), 438–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, J., Salminen, J., & Säntti, J. (2010). Teorian ja käytännön ristiaallokossa—luokanopettajan koulutuksen akatemisoituminen ja sen heijastuminen opettajaksi opiskelevien praktisiin valmiuksiin. In A. Teoksessa, A. Kallioniemi, A. Toom, M. Ubani, & H. Linnansaari (Eds.), (toim.), Akateeminen luokanopettajankoulutus: 30 vuotta teoriaa, käytäntöä ja maistereita (pp. 51–76). Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 52. Jyväskylä: Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (1973). What is the basic teaching skill? Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 144–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, G. E. (1997). Improving the ‘awful reputation’ of education research. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhart, E. (Eds.). (2000). Perspektiven der Lehrerbildung in Deutschland. Abschlussbericht der von der Kultusministerkonferenz eingesetzten Komission. Weinham und Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., Stenberg, K., Maaranen, K., & Kansanen, P. (2010). The experiences of research-based approach of teacher education: Suggestions for the future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I., Hansen, S.-E., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. J. (2001). Border crossing and other journeys: Re-envisioning the doctoral preparation of educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pertti Kansanen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kansanen, P. (2014). Teaching as a Master’s Level Profession in Finland: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Solutions. In: McNamara, O., Murray, J., Jones, M. (eds) Workplace Learning in Teacher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7826-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics