Abstract
In the Finnish teacher education system, teachers (in grades 1–12) pass a master’s degree in the university. In this chapter, the most important theoretical aspects that underpin the Finnish teacher education programmes are described and analysed, and we consider why it may be called research-based teacher education. The primary class pre-service teachers write their master’s thesis in ‘education’, while the secondary subject pre-service teachers write it in their ‘main subject’ within their own faculty (mathematics, physics, history, language, religion, etc.). Teacher education is considered from two perspectives or strata. The first deals with everyday practice and can be called a basic level of teacher education; the other stratum may be called a conceptual level of teacher education. An organising theme, a research-based approach, is applied as an integrative principle throughout the programme. It is built on evidence of research, teachers’ pedagogical thinking, and close theory-practice relation. University practice schools have an important role connecting practical experiences with theoretical studies. These schools and their teachers, mentors of student teaching at the same time, are specialised in teacher education and work closely with the supervisors of the university department. The system is supported with a model of peer-group mentoring in order to facilitate adaptation into the profession at the beginning of the career.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Rezeptological approach: research on recipes and tips that the supervisors give and the pre-service teachers ask during their teaching practice.
References
Allison, C. B. (1995). Present and past. Essays for teachers in the history of education. New York: Peter Lang.
Bengtsson, J. (1993). Theory and practice: Two fundamental categories in the philosophy of teacher education. Educational Review, 45(3), 205–211.
Bengtsson, J. (1995). What is reflection? On reflection in the teaching profession and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 1(1), 23–32.
Berliner, D. (2000). A personal response to those who bash teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 358–371.
Berliner, D. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.
Berliner, D. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205–213.
Biddle, B. J., Good, T. L., & Goodson, I. F. (Eds.). (1997). International handbook of teachers and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Calderhead, J. (1984). Teachers’ classroom decision-making. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Washington, D.C.: AERA and Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, D. J., & Demers, K. E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Eddy, D. (2005). Evidence-based medicine: A unified approach. Health Affairs, 24, 9–17.
Fitzgibbons, R. E. (1981). Making educational decisions. An introduction to philosophy of education. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gage, N. L. (1994). The scientific status of research on teaching. Educational Theory, 44, 371–383.
Galluzo, G. R., & Pankratz, R. S. (1990). Five attributes of a teacher education program knowledge base. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 7–14.
Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.
Guhl, E., & Ott, E. H. (1985). Unterrichtsmetodisches Denken und Handeln. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Handal, G., & Lauvås, P. (1987). Promoting reflective teaching. Supervision in practice. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Heikkinen, H., Tynjälä, P., & Jokinen, H. (Eds.). (2012). Peer-group mentoring for teachers’ professional development. New York, NY: Routledge.
Howey, K. (1996). Designing coherent and effective teacher education programs. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 143–170). New York: Macmillan.
Hytönen, J. (1995). The role of school practice in teacher education. In Kansanen (Ed.), Discussions on some educational issues VI (pp. 77–83). Research Report 145. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki (ED394958)
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland. Research in Educational Sciences, 25. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2007). Education as a societal contributor. Reflections by Finnish educationalists. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
Jyrhämä, R. (2006). The function of practical studies in teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland—Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association
Jyrhämä, R., & Syrjäläinen, E. (2011). ‘Good pal, wise dad and nagging wife’—and other views by teaching practice mentors. In A. Lauriala, R. Rajala, H. Ruokamo & O. Ylitapio-Mäntylä (Eds.), Navigating in educational contexts. Identities and cultures in dialogue (pp. 137–149). Rotterdam: Springer.
Kaestle, C. F. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Reseacher, 22(1), 26–31.
Kansanen, P. (1991). Pedagogical thinking: The basic problem of teacher education. European Journal of Education, 26, 251–260.
Kansanen, P. (2001). Using subjective pedagogical theories to enhance teacher education. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 29(3), 268–286.
Kansanen, P. (2004). The role of general education in teacher education. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 7(2), 207–218.
Kansanen, P. (2007). Research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as a societal contributor (pp. 131–146). Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
Kansanen, P. (2010). HORRIBILE DICTU: The success story of the Finnish school system. In A. Liimets (Ed.), Denkkulturen. Selbstwerdung des Menschen. Erziehungskulturen (pp. 95–110). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kansanen, P., Tirri, K., Meri, M., Krokfros, L., Husu, J., & Jyrhämä, R. (2000). Teachers’ pedagogical thinking: Theoretical landscapes, practical challenges. New York: Peter Lang.
Kindsvatter, R., Wilen, W., & Ishler, M. (1992). Dynamics of effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Kleven, T. A. (1991). Interactive teacher decision-making—still a basic skill? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 287–294.
König, E. (1975). Theorie der Erziehungswissenschaft. Band 1. Wissenschaftstheoretische Richtungen der Pädagogik. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Krokfors, L. (2007). Two-fold role of reflective pedagogical practise in research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as a societal contributor (pp. 147–159). Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Labaree, D. F. (1997). How to succeed in school without really learning. The credentials race in American education. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22.
Maaranen, K. (2009). Practitioner research as part of professional development in initial teacher education. Teacher Development, 13(3), 219–237.
Maaranen, K. (2010). Teacher students’ MA Theses—A gateway to analytic thinking about teaching? A case study of Finnish primary school teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(5), 487–500.
McCourt, F. (2005). Teacher man. A memoir. London: Harper Perennial.
Meyer, H. (1980). Leitfaden zur Unterrichtsvorbereitung. Frankfurt am Main: Cornelsen Verlag Scriptor.
Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.). (2012). The miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Paschen, H., & Wigger, L. (Eds.). (1992). Pädagogisches Argumentieren. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Penso, S., & Shoham, E. (2003). Student teachers’ reasoning while making pedagogical decisions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 313–328.
Prange, K. (2008). Review of the book: Ricken, N. (2007). (Hrsg.). Über die Verachtung der Pädagogik. Analysen—Materialien—Perspektiven. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 54 (3), 438–441.
Rantala, J., Salminen, J., & Säntti, J. (2010). Teorian ja käytännön ristiaallokossa—luokanopettajan koulutuksen akatemisoituminen ja sen heijastuminen opettajaksi opiskelevien praktisiin valmiuksiin. In A. Teoksessa, A. Kallioniemi, A. Toom, M. Ubani, & H. Linnansaari (Eds.), (toim.), Akateeminen luokanopettajankoulutus: 30 vuotta teoriaa, käytäntöä ja maistereita (pp. 51–76). Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 52. Jyväskylä: Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Shavelson, R. J. (1973). What is the basic teaching skill? Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 144–151.
Sroufe, G. E. (1997). Improving the ‘awful reputation’ of education research. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 26–28.
Terhart, E. (Eds.). (2000). Perspektiven der Lehrerbildung in Deutschland. Abschlussbericht der von der Kultusministerkonferenz eingesetzten Komission. Weinham und Basel: Beltz.
Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., Stenberg, K., Maaranen, K., & Kansanen, P. (2010). The experiences of research-based approach of teacher education: Suggestions for the future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 339–352.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westbury, I., Hansen, S.-E., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475–485.
Young, L. J. (2001). Border crossing and other journeys: Re-envisioning the doctoral preparation of educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 3–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kansanen, P. (2014). Teaching as a Master’s Level Profession in Finland: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Solutions. In: McNamara, O., Murray, J., Jones, M. (eds) Workplace Learning in Teacher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7826-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7826-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7825-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7826-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)