Keywords

Science Education Material Science Science Education Research Professional Learning Community Iterative Evolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersson, B., & Bach, F. (2005). On designing and evaluating teaching sequences taking geometrical optics as an example. Science Education, 89(2), 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chinn, A. C., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Learning to use scientific models: Multiple dimensions of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 191–225). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duit, R., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (1997). Studies on educational reconstruction of chaos theory. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 1–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezenb, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C., Davies, Gr., Parchmann, I., Rannikmae, M., & Sjoberg, Sv. (2005). Europe needs more scientists: Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe. Report by the High Level Expert Group on Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe, European Commission: DG Research, Science and Society Programme, ISBN 92-894-8458-6.Google Scholar
  8. Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2005). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lijnse, P. L. (1995). “Developmental Research” as a way to an empirically based “didactical structure” of science. Science Education, 79(2), 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  12. Van Dijk, E., & Kattman, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897. doi:  10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002
  13. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of Western MacedoniaFlorinaGreece

Personalised recommendations