Integrated Pest Management policy, research and implementation: European initiatives



Times are changing for pest management in Europe. Stronger societal demands and pesticide resistance pressure farmers to reduce their reliance on pesticides more than ever before. Reconciling human health and environmental goals with production is a challenge for farmers as well as for all crop-protection stakeholders. Expectations that research and extension will quickly provide solutions are high everywhere. Although a few European countries have acquired experience with pesticide action plans or implementation of integrated pest management (IPM) guidelines on a national scale, many others are starting from a more modest base. Stakeholders in Europe are looking beyond their national borders to create synergies and share experiences and know-how. Representatives of the European Commission and Parliament, governments, research, extension, farmers, industry, and civil society are engaged in dynamic interactions. A Europe-wide structure (an ERA-Net) able to coordinate national calls for research and extension proposals on IPM is planned for 2014. Since 2007, the 10-country network ENDURE has pooled expertise among its 15 research, education, and extension member institutions. It has conducted joint reviews and original studies on IPM, organized summer schools, set up an internet-based platform on wheat cultivars and pathogens, and continues to support workshops, newsletters, and an information center with 1,600 entries for advisers. After earlier successes on insect pest management in North America or with resource-poor farmers in developing countries, Europe is set to become a source of renewed inspiration for IPM applied to conventional agriculture in industrialized countries and broadened to encompass all pest categories.


Crop protection IPM ENDURE Europe Coordination Transnational  Research Extension 


  1. Anonymous. (2008). National action plan on sustainable use of plant protection products. Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection Bonn. Accessed 18 July 2012.
  2. Anonymous. (2013). Plan Banane Durable 2. Accessed 11 Oct 2013.
  3. Barzman, M. S., & Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S. (2011). Comparative analysis of pesticide action plans in five European countries. Pest Management Science, 67(12), 1481–1485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deguine, J. P., Rousse, P., & Atiama-Nurbel, T. (2012). Agroecological crop protection: Concepts and a case study from Reunion. In L. Larramendy & S. Soloneski (Eds.), Integrated pest management and pest control: Current and future tactics (pp. 63–76). Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Publisher.Google Scholar
  5. ENDURE. (2009). DSS: Helping farmers make smart decisions. Accessed 10 Oct 2013. ENDURE. (2010). Integrated pest management in Europe. Chapter 1: 8–39. INRA publication. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.
  6. ENDURE. (2011a). On the implementation of the eight principles of IPM. Accessed 30 Aug 2012.
  7. ENDURE. (2011b). ENDURE and PURE in International Innovation. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.
  8. EU SCAR. (2012). Agricultural knowledge systems and innovation systems in transition—A reflection paper. Brussels. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.
  9. Ferguson, A. W., & Alomar, O. (2010). Landscape studies for conservation biological control research: Status and future needs. A meta-review from the EU NoE project ENDURE. Conservation biological control at the landscape level: Measuring and modelling. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 41–44.Google Scholar
  10. Graf, B., Höpli, H. U., & Höhn, H., & Blaise, Ph. (2002). SOPRA: A forecasting tool for insect pests in apple orchards. Actahorticulturae, 584, 207–214.Google Scholar
  11. Labussière, E., Barzman, M. S., & Ricci, P. (2010). European crop protection in 2030. A foresight study. Paris: INRA publication.Google Scholar
  12. Lötscher, M., & Tschumi, M. (2012). Forschungskonzept für die Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft 2013–2016 (agri- andagri-food research masterplan 2013–2016). Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft, Bern. p. 123. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.
  13. Melander, B., Munier-Jolain, N., Charles, R., Wirth, J., Schwarz, J., van der W. R., Bonin, L., Jensen, P. K., & Kudsk, P. (2013). European perspectives on the adoption of non-chemical weed management in reduced tillage systems for arable crops. Weed Technology, 27, 231–240.Google Scholar
  14. Meissle, M., Mouron, P., Musa, T., Bigler, F., Pons, X., Vasileiadis, V. P., Otto, S., Antichi, D., Kiss, J., Pálinkás, Z., Dorner, Z., van der Weide, R., Groten, J., Czembor, E., Adamczyk, J., Thibord, J.-B., Melander, B., Cordsen Nielsen, G., Poulsen, R. T., Zimmermann, O., Verschwele, A., & Oldenburg, E. (2010). Pests, pesticide use and alternative options in European maize production: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Applied Entomology, 134, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moonen, A. C., Bohan, D., Petit, S., Chauvel, B., Eggenschwiler, L., Otto, S., & Golla, B. (2010). Parameter harmonisation for calculating landscape configuration effects on weed communities. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 83–86.Google Scholar
  16. Mouron, P., Heijne, B., Naef, A., Strassemeyer, J., Hayer, F., Avilla, J., Alaphilippe, A., Höhn, H., Hernandez, J., Gaillard, G., Mack, G., Solé, J., Sauphanor, B., Samietz, J., Patocchi, A., Bravin, E., Lavigne, C., Bohanec, M., Aubert, U., & Bigler, F. (2012). Sustainability assessment of crop protection systems: SustainOS methodology and its application for apple orchards. Agricultural Systems, 113, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicot, P. C. (Ed.). (2011). Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: Critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success. Published by International Organization for Biological Control. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.
  18. Pelzer, E., Fortino, G., Bockstaller, C., Angevin, F., Lamine, C., Moonen, C., Vasileiadis, V., Guerin, V., Guichard, L., Reau, R., & Messean, A. (2012). Assessing innovative cropping systems with DEXiPM, a qualitative multi-criteria assessment tool derived from DEXi. Ecological Indicators, 18, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petit, S., Lavigne, C., Ferguson, A., Tixier, P., Bohan, D., Denholm, I., Otto, S., Alomar, O., Veres, A., Eggenschwiler, L., Bocci, G., Moonen, A. C., & Golla, B. (2010). Conservation biological control at the landscape level: Measuring and modelling. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 87–93.Google Scholar
  20. Risède, J.-M., Lescot, T., Cabrera Cabrera, J., Guillon, M., Tomekpe, K., Kema, G. H. J., & Cote, F. (2010). Challenging short and mid-term strategies to reduce the use of pesticides in banana production. Banana field study—Guide number 1. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.
  21. Sanco, D. G. (2012). State of art on the sustainable use directive. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.
  22. Samietz, J., Graf, B., Höhn, H., Schaub, L., & Höpli, H. U. (2007). Phenology modelling of major insect pestsin fruit orchards from biological basics to decision support: The forecasting tool SOPRA. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 37, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vasileiadis, V. P., Sattin, M., Otto, S., Veres, A., Pálinkás, Z., Ban, R., Pons, X., Kudsk, P., van der Weide, R., Czembor, E., Moonen, A. C., & Kiss, J. (2011). Crop protection in European maize-based cropping systems: Current practices and recommendations for innovative integrated pest management. Agricultural Systems, 104, 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Veres, A., Petit, S., Conord, C., & Lavigne, C. (2010). A literature review on impacts of landscapes characteristics on densities of pests and on their regulation by natural enemies. Conservation biological control at the landscape level: Measuring and modelling. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 129–133.Google Scholar
  25. Veres, A., Petit, S., Conord, C., & Lavigne, C. (2011). Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 138, 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.027.Google Scholar
  26. Viret, O., Dubuis, P.-H., Fabre, A. L., Bloesch, B., Siegfried, W., Naef, A., Hubert, M., Bleyer, G., Kassemeyer, H.-H., Breuer, M., & Krause, R. (2011). An interactive platform for better management of grapevine diseases and pests. Bulletin IOBC wprs, 67(7): 85–91.
  27. Zijlstra, C., Lund, I., Justesen, A., Nicolaisen, M., Bianciotto, V., Posta, K., Balestrini, R., Przetakiewicz, A., Czembor, E., & van de Zande, J. (2011). Prospects of future crop protection using innovative diagnostic tools and precision spray techniques. Pest Management Science, 67(6), 616–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Plant Health and the EnvironmentINRA—Ecological impacts of innovations in plant productionThivervalFrance
  2. 2.Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil ACWPlant Protection and Fruit and Vegetable ExtensionWädenswilSwitzerland
  3. 3.Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated PlantsKleinmachnowGermany
  4. 4.Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Crop ProductionAarhus NDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Agro-ecologyAarhus UniversitySlagelseDenmark
  6. 6.Institute of Life SciencesLand Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPisaItaly
  7. 7.CIRADUnité de recherche HortSysMontpellier Cedex 5France
  8. 8.CIRADMontpellier Cedex 5France
  9. 9.Institute of agro-envinronmental and forest biology, National Research CouncilLegnaro (Padova)Italy

Personalised recommendations