Skip to main content

Integrated Pest Management policy, research and implementation: European initiatives


Times are changing for pest management in Europe. Stronger societal demands and pesticide resistance pressure farmers to reduce their reliance on pesticides more than ever before. Reconciling human health and environmental goals with production is a challenge for farmers as well as for all crop-protection stakeholders. Expectations that research and extension will quickly provide solutions are high everywhere. Although a few European countries have acquired experience with pesticide action plans or implementation of integrated pest management (IPM) guidelines on a national scale, many others are starting from a more modest base. Stakeholders in Europe are looking beyond their national borders to create synergies and share experiences and know-how. Representatives of the European Commission and Parliament, governments, research, extension, farmers, industry, and civil society are engaged in dynamic interactions. A Europe-wide structure (an ERA-Net) able to coordinate national calls for research and extension proposals on IPM is planned for 2014. Since 2007, the 10-country network ENDURE has pooled expertise among its 15 research, education, and extension member institutions. It has conducted joint reviews and original studies on IPM, organized summer schools, set up an internet-based platform on wheat cultivars and pathogens, and continues to support workshops, newsletters, and an information center with 1,600 entries for advisers. After earlier successes on insect pest management in North America or with resource-poor farmers in developing countries, Europe is set to become a source of renewed inspiration for IPM applied to conventional agriculture in industrialized countries and broadened to encompass all pest categories.


  • Crop protection
  • IPM
  • Europe
  • Coordination
  • Transnational 
  • Research
  • Extension

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7802-3_17
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-7802-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)


  1. 1.

    D. G. Sanco, June 20, 2012 meeting, Brussels.


  • Anonymous. (2008). National action plan on sustainable use of plant protection products. Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection Bonn. Accessed 18 July 2012.

  • Anonymous. (2013). Plan Banane Durable 2. Accessed 11 Oct 2013.

  • Barzman, M. S., & Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S. (2011). Comparative analysis of pesticide action plans in five European countries. Pest Management Science, 67(12), 1481–1485.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deguine, J. P., Rousse, P., & Atiama-Nurbel, T. (2012). Agroecological crop protection: Concepts and a case study from Reunion. In L. Larramendy & S. Soloneski (Eds.), Integrated pest management and pest control: Current and future tactics (pp. 63–76). Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENDURE. (2009). DSS: Helping farmers make smart decisions. Accessed 10 Oct 2013. ENDURE. (2010). Integrated pest management in Europe. Chapter 1: 8–39. INRA publication. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.

  • ENDURE. (2011a). On the implementation of the eight principles of IPM. Accessed 30 Aug 2012.

  • ENDURE. (2011b). ENDURE and PURE in International Innovation. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.

  • EU SCAR. (2012). Agricultural knowledge systems and innovation systems in transition—A reflection paper. Brussels. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.

  • Ferguson, A. W., & Alomar, O. (2010). Landscape studies for conservation biological control research: Status and future needs. A meta-review from the EU NoE project ENDURE. Conservation biological control at the landscape level: Measuring and modelling. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, B., Höpli, H. U., & Höhn, H., & Blaise, Ph. (2002). SOPRA: A forecasting tool for insect pests in apple orchards. Actahorticulturae, 584, 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labussière, E., Barzman, M. S., & Ricci, P. (2010). European crop protection in 2030. A foresight study. Paris: INRA publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lötscher, M., & Tschumi, M. (2012). Forschungskonzept für die Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft 2013–2016 (agri- andagri-food research masterplan 2013–2016). Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft, Bern. p. 123. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.

  • Melander, B., Munier-Jolain, N., Charles, R., Wirth, J., Schwarz, J., van der W. R., Bonin, L., Jensen, P. K., & Kudsk, P. (2013). European perspectives on the adoption of non-chemical weed management in reduced tillage systems for arable crops. Weed Technology, 27, 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissle, M., Mouron, P., Musa, T., Bigler, F., Pons, X., Vasileiadis, V. P., Otto, S., Antichi, D., Kiss, J., Pálinkás, Z., Dorner, Z., van der Weide, R., Groten, J., Czembor, E., Adamczyk, J., Thibord, J.-B., Melander, B., Cordsen Nielsen, G., Poulsen, R. T., Zimmermann, O., Verschwele, A., & Oldenburg, E. (2010). Pests, pesticide use and alternative options in European maize production: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Applied Entomology, 134, 357–375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moonen, A. C., Bohan, D., Petit, S., Chauvel, B., Eggenschwiler, L., Otto, S., & Golla, B. (2010). Parameter harmonisation for calculating landscape configuration effects on weed communities. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouron, P., Heijne, B., Naef, A., Strassemeyer, J., Hayer, F., Avilla, J., Alaphilippe, A., Höhn, H., Hernandez, J., Gaillard, G., Mack, G., Solé, J., Sauphanor, B., Samietz, J., Patocchi, A., Bravin, E., Lavigne, C., Bohanec, M., Aubert, U., & Bigler, F. (2012). Sustainability assessment of crop protection systems: SustainOS methodology and its application for apple orchards. Agricultural Systems, 113, 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nicot, P. C. (Ed.). (2011). Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: Critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success. Published by International Organization for Biological Control. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.

  • Pelzer, E., Fortino, G., Bockstaller, C., Angevin, F., Lamine, C., Moonen, C., Vasileiadis, V., Guerin, V., Guichard, L., Reau, R., & Messean, A. (2012). Assessing innovative cropping systems with DEXiPM, a qualitative multi-criteria assessment tool derived from DEXi. Ecological Indicators, 18, 171–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S., Lavigne, C., Ferguson, A., Tixier, P., Bohan, D., Denholm, I., Otto, S., Alomar, O., Veres, A., Eggenschwiler, L., Bocci, G., Moonen, A. C., & Golla, B. (2010). Conservation biological control at the landscape level: Measuring and modelling. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risède, J.-M., Lescot, T., Cabrera Cabrera, J., Guillon, M., Tomekpe, K., Kema, G. H. J., & Cote, F. (2010). Challenging short and mid-term strategies to reduce the use of pesticides in banana production. Banana field study—Guide number 1. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.

  • Sanco, D. G. (2012). State of art on the sustainable use directive. Accessed 13 Sept 2012.

  • Samietz, J., Graf, B., Höhn, H., Schaub, L., & Höpli, H. U. (2007). Phenology modelling of major insect pestsin fruit orchards from biological basics to decision support: The forecasting tool SOPRA. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 37, 255–260.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vasileiadis, V. P., Sattin, M., Otto, S., Veres, A., Pálinkás, Z., Ban, R., Pons, X., Kudsk, P., van der Weide, R., Czembor, E., Moonen, A. C., & Kiss, J. (2011). Crop protection in European maize-based cropping systems: Current practices and recommendations for innovative integrated pest management. Agricultural Systems, 104, 533–540.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Veres, A., Petit, S., Conord, C., & Lavigne, C. (2010). A literature review on impacts of landscapes characteristics on densities of pests and on their regulation by natural enemies. Conservation biological control at the landscape level: Measuring and modelling. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 56, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veres, A., Petit, S., Conord, C., & Lavigne, C. (2011). Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 138, 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viret, O., Dubuis, P.-H., Fabre, A. L., Bloesch, B., Siegfried, W., Naef, A., Hubert, M., Bleyer, G., Kassemeyer, H.-H., Breuer, M., & Krause, R. (2011). An interactive platform for better management of grapevine diseases and pests. Bulletin IOBC wprs, 67(7): 85–91.

  • Zijlstra, C., Lund, I., Justesen, A., Nicolaisen, M., Bianciotto, V., Posta, K., Balestrini, R., Przetakiewicz, A., Czembor, E., & van de Zande, J. (2011). Prospects of future crop protection using innovative diagnostic tools and precision spray techniques. Pest Management Science, 67(6), 616–625.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco S. Barzman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barzman, M. et al. (2014). Integrated Pest Management policy, research and implementation: European initiatives. In: Peshin, R., Pimentel, D. (eds) Integrated Pest Management. Springer, Dordrecht.

Download citation