Being a Woman in a Man’s Place or Being a Man in a Woman’s Place: Insights into Students’ Experiences of Science and Engineering at University

  • Lene Møller Madsen
  • Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard
  • Lars Ulriksen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a study carried out in three Danish higher education study programmes within science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM), each with a heavy imbalance in students’ biological sex. In Denmark few female students apply for computer science and physics with nanotechnology while few male students apply for molecular biomedicine. The study explores how students of the minority biological sex attain recognition within the study programme and how they negotiate their identities to gain a sense of belonging. The results show how both male and female students, being the minority in their study programme, need to engage in narrow gendered identity negotiation-processes to belong and become socially and academically integrated into their new study programme. We show how female students need to position themselves as non-feminine and strive to become ‘one of the boys’ whereas male students are restricted to positioning a certain kind of masculinity to become recognized. There is more room for doing gender within computer science for the female students than within physics and nanotechnology. The male students within molecular biomedicine are expected to position themselves as something different from the girls. Their negotiation strategy to get integrated into their study programme could be labelled as ‘segregation’. The implications of these results are discussed.

Keywords

Computer Science Female Student Male Student Study Programme Fellow Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). Doing’ science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physics – Doing gender. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discoursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1).Google Scholar
  6. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Due, K. (2012). Who is the competent physics student? A study of students’ positions and social interaction in small-group discussions. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–19.Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, J., & Calvert, S. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonsalves, A. J. (2010). Discourses and gender in doctoral physics: A hard look inside a hard science. Montréal: McGill University. Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  10. Haake, U. (2011). Contradictory values in doctoral education: A study of gender composition in disciplines in Swedish academia. Higher Education, 62, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasse, C. (2002). Kultur i bevægelse – fra deltagerobservation til kulturanalyse – i det fysiske rum. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  12. Hasse, C. (2008). Learning and transition in a culture of playful physicists. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henwood, F. (1998). Engineering difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology. Gender and Education, 10, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmegaard, H., Madsen, L., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). A journey of negotiation and belonging: understanding students’ transitions to science and engineering in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 755–786. doi:  10.1007/s11422-013-9542-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes, G. (2001). Exploring the availability of student scientist identities within curriculum discourse: An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science. Gender and Education, 13(3), 275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Phillips, A. (2007). Re-inscribing gender binaries: Deconstructing the dominant discourse around women’s equality in science, engineering, and technology. Sociological Review, 55, 768–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2009). How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(4), 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sinnes, A., & Løken, M. (2012). Gendered education in a gendered world: Looking beyond cosmetic solutions to the gender gap in science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–22.Google Scholar
  19. Søndergaard, D. M. (1996). Tegnet på kroppen. Køn: Koder og konstruktioner blandt unge voksne i akademia. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
  20. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college. Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Tonso, K. L. (1999). Engineering gender – Gendering engineering: A cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5, 365–404.Google Scholar
  22. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ulriksen, L., Holmegaard, H. T., & Madsen, L. M. (2013). Weaving a bridge of sense: Students’ narrative constructions as a lens for understanding students’ coping with the gap between expectancies and experiences when entering higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 310–319.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lene Møller Madsen
    • 1
  • Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard
    • 1
  • Lars Ulriksen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science EducationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen CDenmark

Personalised recommendations