Epistemic Reasoning in Life and Literature
Epistemic Logic has recently acquired importance as a growing field with influence in Distributed Computing, Philosophy, Economics, and of late even in Social Science and Animal behavior. Here, on a relatively light note, we give examples of epistemic reasoning occurring in literature and used very effectively by writers like Shakespeare, Shaw, Arthur Conan Doyle, and O’Henry. For variety we also give an example of epistemic reasoning used by fireflies, although it is far fetched to suppose that fireflies use epistemic reasoning in any kind of a conscious way. Surely they are getting a lot of help from Darwin. It is this writer’s hope that epistemic reasoning as a formal discipline will some day acquire importance comparable to that of Statistics. Hopefully these examples make part of the case.
KeywordsEpistemic reasoning Theory of mind Multiagent epistemology Logic in literature Game theory in literature
Thanks to Steven Brams, Yang Liu, Carol Parikh, Prashant Parikh, Paul Pedersen, Hilary Putnam, Noson Yanofsky and Ruili Ye for comments. This paper was supported by a grant from PSC-CUNY under the Faculty Research Assistance Program.
- Brams, S. (2011). Game theory and the humanities: Bridging two worlds. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Brams, S. (2003). Bibliocal games. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Chwe, M. S.-Y. (2013). Jane Austen, Game theorist. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Chwe, M. S.-Y. (2003). Rational ritual. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wikipedia entry on Drona, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drona.
- Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures and other reports from my life with autism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Kourousias, G., & Makinson, D. (September 2007). Parallel interpolation, splitting, and relevance in belief change. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 72, 994–1002.Google Scholar
- Osborne, M., & Rubinsein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Parikh, R. (1999). Belief revision and language splitting. In Proc. Logic, Language and Computation, Ed. Moss, Ginzburg and de Rijke, CSLI 1999, pp. 266–278 (earlier version appeared in 1996 in the prliminary proceedings).Google Scholar
- Parikh, R. (March 2011). Beth definability, interpolation and language splitting. Synthese, 179(2), 211–221.Google Scholar
- Parikh, R. (2008). Sentences, belief and logical omniscience, or what does deduction tell us? Review of Symbolic Logic, 1, 459–476.Google Scholar
- Parikh, R., & Ramanujam, R. (2003). Journal of Logic, Language and Information. A knowledge based semantics of messages, 12, 453–467.Google Scholar
- Parikh, R., Tasdemir, C., & Witzel, A. (2011). The power of knowledge in games, http://cuny.academia.edu/RohitParikh/Papers/.
- Premack, D. G., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4).Google Scholar
- Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on mars. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. (2009). The mahabharata : An abridged translation (p. 477). New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.Google Scholar