Road Salt and Environmental Hazards—Identification of Vulnerable Water Resources

Conference paper

Abstract

The Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) just finished a four year research and development project, entitled: “Salt SMART”. The objective has been that the NPRA’s effort to maintain ease of passage and traffic safety during winter, shall not result in unacceptable effects to the environment. To solve this, areas vulnerable to road salt within Norway has been identified. In this paper, a flowchart method to identify water resources vulnerable to road salt has been presented. Readily accessible data or methods, produced in the Salt SMART project have been used. The results have been processed and presented in a GIS (Geographic Information System).

Keywords

Chloride Concentration Municipal Water Geographic Information System Road Salt Salt Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Amundsen C-E, Haaland S, French H, Roseth R, Kitterød N-O, Pedersen PA, Riise G (2010) Salt SMART: environmental damages caused by road salt -a literature review. Norwegian Institute for agricultural and environmental research and department of plant and environmental sciences, Norwegian University of Life SciencesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bækken T, Færøvig PJ (2004) Effekter av vegforurensninger på vannkvalitet og biologi i Padderudvann. Publikasjon nr. 106. Teknologiavdelingen, OsloGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bækken T, Haugen TO (2006) Chemical state in lakes near road (in Norwegian). Norwegian Institute for Water ResearchGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bækken T, Haugen TO (2012) Road salt and heavy metals in lakes along roads in Southern Norway 2010 (in Norwegian). Norwegian Public Roads AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brencic M, Barbosa AE, Leitao T, Rot M (2012) Identification of water bodies sensitive to pollution from road runoff. A new methodology based on the practices of Slovenia and Portugal. Urban environment: proceedings of the 10th Urban Environment Symposium, pp 225–235Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corsi SR, Graczyk DJ, Geis SW, Booth NL, Richards KD (2010) A fresh look at road salt: aquatic toxicity and water-quality impacts on local, regional, and national scales. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7376–7382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crabtree B, Dempsey P, Johnson I, Whitehead M (2009) The development of an ecological approach to manage the pollution risk from highway runoff. Water Sci Technol 59(3):549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faith-Ell C, Balfors B, Folkeson L (2005) The application of environmental requirements in Swedish road maintenance contracts. Royal Institute of Technology, Department of land and water resources engineering Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gontier M, Olofsson B (2003) Spatial vulnerability assessment for road contamination on groundwater. Division of land and water resources, Department of civil and environmental engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haaland S, Turtumøygard S, Gjemlestad L-J, Nytrø T-E (2012) Salt SMART road salt in lakes -threshold limits regarding chemical stratification. Norwegian Public Roads AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haugen TO, Bækken T, Hasle HH, Skjelbred B (2010) Salt tolerance in lake phytoplankton -statistical analyses and toxicity tests (in Norwegian). ISBN No.: 978-82-577-5749-6 edn. Norwegian Institute for Water ResearchGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson RB, Jobbagy EG (2005) From icy roads to salty streams. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(41):14487–14488Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jin L, Whitehead P, Siegel DI, Findlay S (2011) Salting our landscape: an integrated catchment model using readily accessible data to assess emerging road salt contamination to streams. Environ PollutGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelly VR, Lovett GM, Weathers KC, Findlay SEG, Strayer DL, Burns DJ, Likens GE (2008) Long-term sodium chloride retention in a rural watershed: legacy effects of road salt on streamater concentration. Environ Sci Technol 42(2):410–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelting DL, Laxson CL, Yerger EC (2012) Regional analysis of the effect of paved roads on sodium and chloride in lakes. Water Res 46(8):2749–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitterød NO, Turtumøygard S, Aakerøy PA, Haaland S (2010) Estimation of the average saltfluks from road to water body (in Norwegian). Department of plant and environmental sciences, Norwegian University of life sciences and soil and environmental division, Norwegian Institute for agriculture and environmental researchGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lundmark A (2003) Predicting environmental impact of deicing salt -a modeling approach. Division of land and water resources, Department of civil and environmental engineering, Royal Institute of technology, StokcholmGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meland S (2010) Ecotoxicological effects of highway and tunnel wash water runoff. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, ÅsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ministry of the Environment (2006) FOR 2006-12-15 nr 1446: the Norwegian water framework regulations (FOR 2006- 12- 15 nr 1446: forskrift om rammer for vannforvaltningen)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramakrishna DM, Viraraghavan T (2005) Environmental impact of chemical deicers—a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 166(1–4):49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rimmer A, Aota Y, Kumagai M, Eckert W (2005) Chemical stratification in thermally stratified lakes: a chloride mass balance model. Limnol Oceanogr 50(1):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scholes L, Revitt DM, Ellis JB (2008) A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials. J Environ Manage 88(3):467–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sivertsen à (2010) Reporting of the road salt consumption winter 2009/2010 (in Norwegian). Technology Department, Norwegian Public Roads Administration, OsloGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smart R, White CC, Townend J, Cresser MS (2001) A model for predicting chloride concentrations in river water in a relatively unpolluted catchment in north-east Scotland. Sci Total Environ 265(1–3):131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thunqvist EL (2003) Estimating chloride concentration in surface water and groundwater due to deicing salt application. Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thunqvist EL (2003) Increased chloride concentration in a lake due to deicing salt application. Water Sci Technol 48(9):51–59Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thunqvist EL (2004) Regional increase of mean chloride concentration in water due to the application of deicing salt. Sci Total Environ 325(1–3):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tjøstheim H (2011) Spatial variation of atmospheric chlorid to Norwegian water sources. University of Life SciencesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Assessment SectionNorwegian Public Roads AdministrationOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations