Advertisement

The Effect of Government Policies on the Temporal Development of Contamination Characteristics Within the Aerosol Distribution in Beijing, China

  • Yuan Chen
  • Nina Schleicher
  • Yizhen Chen
  • Fahe Chai
  • Shulan Wang
  • Stefan Norra
Conference paper

Abstract

To host Green Olympic Games, the Beijing municipal government took comprehensive measures to improve air quality in 2008, which partly are still in force in 2012. The aim of this study is to investigate the temporal distribution of aerosol contamination characteristics and their variations under different government intervention policies. PM2.5 samples were collected continuously from 2007 to 2010 in the north of Beijing City. Element concentrations were analyzed by HR-ICP-MS. Results showed that concentrations of traffic-related elements such as Sn, Sb and Pb varied with the strength of traffic restrictions. Elements like Cr, Co and Ni, which are correlated with industries, were reduced under special policies like the relocation of Capital Steel Company. In general, the improving air quality demonstrates the success of government intervention policies although still the concentrations are too high if compared to international threshold values.

Keywords

Olympic Game Restriction Police License Plate Beijing City Sand Dust Storm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackermann-Liebrich U, Leuenberger P, Schwartz J, Schindler C, Monn C, Bolognini G, et al (1997) Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA) Team (1997) Lung function and long term exposure to air pollutants in Switzerland. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beijing Bureau of Statistics (2012) Beijing statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergstrom RW, Pilewskie P, Russell PB, Redemann J, Bond TC, Quinn PK, Sierau B (2007) Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric aerosols. Atmos Chem Phy 7:5937–5943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buseck PR, Adachi K (2008) Nanoparticles in the atmosphere. Elements 4:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calvo AI, Pont V, Liousse C, Dupree B, Mariscal A, Zouiten C, Gardrat E, Castera P, Lacaux CG, Castro A, Fraile R (2008) Chemical composition of urban aerosols in Toulouse, France during CAPITOUL experiment. Meteorol Atmos Phys 102:307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen Y, Cen K, Norra S, Schleicher N, Yu Y (2010) Study on pollution characteristics of PM2.5 in the aerosol, tracing and tracking atmospheric particulates in Beijing City. Geoscience 24:345–354. (In Chinese, English abstract)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clancy L, Goodman P, Sinclair H, Dockery DW (2002) Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study. Lancet 360:1210–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cyrys J, Sölzel M, Heinrich J, Kreyling WG, Menzel N, Wittmaack K, Tuch T, Wichmann H-Erich (2003) Elemental composition and sources of fine and ultrafine ambient particles in Erfurt, Germany. Sci Total Environ 305:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg MS, Burnett RT, Yale JF, Valois MF, Brook JR (2006) Associations between ambient air pollution and daily mortality among persons with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Environ Res 100:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang X, Olmez I, Aras NK, Gordon GE (1994) Emissions of trace elements from motor vehicles: potential marker elements and source composition profile. Atmos Environ 28:1385–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IPCC (2001) In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate change: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA, 881Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Legrand M, Mayewski P (1997) Glaciochemistry of polar ice cores: a review. Rev Geophys 35:219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma WL, Sun DZ, Shen WG, Yang M, Qi H, Liu LY, Shen JM, Li YF (2011) Atmospheric concentrations, sources and gas-particle partitioning of PAHs in Beijing after the 29th Olympic Games. Environ Pollut 159:1794–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) of the People’s Republic of China (2012) Ambient air quality standard GB3095-2012. China Environmental Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reimann C, Caritat P (1998) Chemical elements in the environment-factsheets for the geo-chemist and environmental scientist. Springer, Berlin, pp 92–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schleicher N, Norra S, Chai F, Chen Y, Wang S, Stüben D (2010) Anthropogenic versus geogeni contribution to total suspended atmospheric particulate matter and its variations during a two-year sampling period in Beijing. China J Environ Monit 12:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schleicher N, Schleicher N, Norra S, Dietze V, Yu Y, Fricker M, Kaminski U, Chen Y, Cen K (2011) The effect of mitigation measures on size distributed mass concentrations of atmospheric particles and black carbon concentrations during the Olympic Summer Games 2008 in Beijing. Sci Total Environ 412–413, 185–193Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schleicher N, Norra S, Chen Y, Chai F, Wang S (2012) Efficiency of mitigation measures to reduce particulate air pollution—a case study during the Olympic Summer Games 2008 in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 146–158Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwartz J, Dockery DW (1992) Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:600–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sternbeck J, Sjödin A, Andréasson K (2002) Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension-results from two tunnel studies. Atmos Environ 36:4735–4744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wåhlin P, Berkowicz R, Palmgren F (2006) Characterisation of traffic generated particulate matter in Copenhagen. Atmos Environ 40:2151–2159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang X, Westerdahl D, Chen LC, Wu Y, Hao J, Pan X, Guo X, Zhang KM (2009) Evaluating the air quality impacts of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games: on-road emission factors and black carbon profiles. Atmos Environ 43:4535–4543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wongphatarakul V, Friedlander SK, Pinto JP (1998) A comparative study of PM2.5 ambientaerosol chemical databases. Environ Sci Technol 32:3926–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu Y, Schleicher N, Norra S, Fricker M, Dietze V, Kaminski U, Cen K, Stüben D (2011) Dynamics and origin of PM2.5 during a three-year sampling period in Beijing, China. J Environ Monit 13:334–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuan Chen
    • 1
  • Nina Schleicher
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yizhen Chen
    • 3
  • Fahe Chai
    • 3
  • Shulan Wang
    • 3
  • Stefan Norra
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Urban and Regional Atmospheric SciencesChinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations