Advertisement

A Basis for Inquiry into Policy Considerations for Increasing the Application of Biophilic Urbanism

  • Angela Reeve
  • Cheryl Desha
  • Charlie Hargroves
  • Peter Newman
  • Doug Hargreaves
Conference paper

Abstract

Urban design that harnesses natural features (such as green roofs and green walls) to improve design outcomes is gaining significant interest, particularly as there is growing evidence of links between human health and wellbeing, and contact with nature. The use of such natural features can provide many significant benefits, such as reduced urban heat island effects, reduced peak energy demand for building cooling, enhanced stormwater attenuation and management, and reduced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. The principle of harnessing natural features as functional design elements, particularly in buildings, is becoming known as ‘biophilic urbanism’. Given the potential for global application and benefits for cities from biophilic urbanism, and the growing number of successful examples of this, it is timely to develop enabling policies that help overcome current barriers to implementation. This paper describes a basis for inquiry into policy considerations related to increasing the application of biophilic urbanism that captures and integrates knowledge from lived experience around the world. The paper draws on research undertaken as part of the Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre (SBEnrc) in Australia. The paper discusses the emergence of a qualitative, mixed-method approach that captures lived experiences and extends beyond the literature and documented journeys of international cities that have encouraged biophilic urbanism. Stakeholder workshops provide context and scope to research to ensure it is targeted, and a meta-narrative is developed to extract key learnings of relevance.

Keywords

Urban Heat Island Green Roof Multiple Case Study Urban Heat Island Effect Policy Consideration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper has been developed as part of the Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre’s ‘Greening the Built Environment’ Program, led by Professor Peter Newman, and supported by the Western Australian Department of Finance, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Townsville City Council (CitySolar Program), and Green Roofs Australasia. Professor Tim Beatley is acknowledged for his mentoring, and Ms Omniya el Baghdadi is acknowledged for peer contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown V (2008) A collective social learning pattern, EuroPLoP Workshop, Klosters Irsee, Bavaria, July 9-13 2008; Brown, V., and Harris, J. (2012) The collective learning handbook: from collaboration to transformation. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bulkeley H (2006) Urban sustainability: learning from best practice? Environ Planning A 38(6):1029–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies A (2012) Can other cities emulate the success of New York’s High Line? Crikey Media. 16 October. blogs.crikey.com.au/theurbanist/2012/10/16/can-other-cities-emulate-the-success-of-new-yorks-high-line/, accessed 16 November, Australia 2012
  4. 4.
    McKenny L (2012) Raising the bar for Goods Line drawcard, The Sydney Morning Herald, Australia, November 14. www.smh.com.au/nsw/raising-the-bar-for-goods-line-drawcard-20121114-29c5f.html, accessed 16 November 2012
  5. 5.
    Newman P (2007) Beyond peak oil: will our cities collapse? Journal of Urban Technology, Vol 14. Iss 2:p 15–30Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2008) Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change. Island Press, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oxford Programme for the Future of Cities (2012) Research, City-to-City Learning, University of Oxford, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society. www.futureofcities.ox.ac.uk/research, accessed 14 November 2012
  8. 8.
    Reeve A, Hargroves K, Desha C, Bucknum M, Newman P (2011) ‘Considering the Application of Biophilic Urbanism: A Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre Discussion Paper’, Curtin University and Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SBEnrc (2012) Can biophilic urbanism deliver strong economic and social benefits in cities? An economic and policy investigation into the increased use of natural elements in urban design, an industry report to the Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre, Project 1.5, Greening the Built Environment Program Curtin University and Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith M, Hargroves K, Desha C (2010) Cents and sustainability: securing our common future by decoupling economic growth from environmental pressures, The Natural Edge Project. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    TCC (2010) ‘Investigation into Existing Community Behaviour Change Programs on Reducing Residential Energy Demand’, Townsville City Council and The Natural Edge Project, as part of the Australian Government Solar Cities ProgramGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Habitat UN (2012) Urban patterns for a green economy: working with nature, united nations human settlements programme, KenyaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Reeve
    • 1
  • Cheryl Desha
    • 1
  • Charlie Hargroves
    • 2
  • Peter Newman
    • 2
  • Doug Hargreaves
    • 1
  1. 1.Queensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations