Suffering on a Global Scale
- 882 Downloads
This project helps locate suffering and its severity around the world, showing how public policy could more effectively reduce suffering and increase societal well-being. The research in this chapter creates and validates indicators for both subjective and objective suffering on a global scale. A life satisfaction measure adapted from the Gallup-Healthways surveys of well-being in 123 countries is used as a social indicator of subjective suffering, while indictors of the prevalence of social traumas like HIV illness, hunger, infant deaths, and poverty function as measures of objective suffering. With this objective measure of suffering, it is now possible to estimate that at least one billion people—a seventh of the worldwide population are in major physical pain at any one time. Gender inequality appears in this analysis as a significant predictor of objective suffering, which implies that gender inequality is a significant cultural barrier to the reduction of suffering. Satisfactory social support networks also were found to help explain variation in national suffering. One interesting finding was that subjective suffering tends to be substantially lower than objective suffering in Latin American countries and a few African countries, and it appears to be related to social solidarity, especially in the family and community.
KeywordsSuffering Global suffering Social suffering Pain Human development index GDP Subjective suffering Objective suffering Hunger Poverty Purpose Social support Religion
- Bromet, E., et al. (2011). Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Medicine 9:90. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/9/90/. Accessed on 25 April 2013.
- Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Chabal, P. (2009). Africa: The politics of suffering and smiling. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion—Why the poorest countries are failing, and what can be done about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- HDR (2010) Human Development Report 2010. See UNDP (2010).Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS 107(38), 16489–16493. http://wws.princeton.edu/news/Income_Happiness/Happiness_Money_Report.pdf. Accessed on 13 April 2013.Google Scholar
- Kelley, A.C. (1989) The international human suffering index: reconsideration of the evidence. Population and Development Review 15(4), pp. 731–737.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. (2001b). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach, Harvard University Press, cambridge.Google Scholar
- Rath, T., & Harter, J. (2010). Well-Being—The first essential elements. New York: The Gallup Press.Google Scholar
- Tsang A, Von Korff, M, Lee S., Alonso, J. Karam, E. et al. (2008). Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. The Journal of Pain. 9(10), 883–891.Google Scholar
- UNDP (2010) Human Development Report 2010. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan for the United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar