Abstract
Examples of inclusion of historical information and short stories in physics textbooks for primary school in Bosnia and Herzegovina are presented and commented upon. These textbooks are analyzed from two perspectives. The first one is the historical accuracy of the included episodes or, in other words, whether the description of the particular episode is consistent with known historical facts. The second more important one is the cognitive perspective: whether the presentation is structured in a cognitively adequate way, giving pupils an opportunity to learn about the nature and effectiveness of physics without inducing some erroneous ideas about omitted details. To illustrate this aspect, we report initial results of a pilot study in which primary school pupils were presented with drawings, thinking and reasoning tasks related to an incomplete and superficial textbook presentation of one important historical episode (the experiment carried out to determine the speed of sound in water). The results show that the pupils are able to detect missing information and propose their own ideas on how they think the experiment was carried out. As some of these ideas are erroneous, superficial textbook presentations of historical episodes are potentially misleading.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford’s enlarged: A content-embedded activity to teach about the nature of science. Physics Education 37, 64–68.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman N.G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.
Benson, D.L., Wittrock, M.C. & Baur, M.E. (1993). Students’ preconceptions of the nature of gases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(6), 587–597.
Binnie, A. (2001). Using the History of Electricity and Magnetism to Enhance Teaching. Science & Education 10(4), 379–389.
Brackenridge, J.B. (1989). Education in science, history of science, and the textbook - Necessary vs. sufficient conditions. Interchange 20(2), 71–80.
Chalmers, A. (2009). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science: The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone – How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Colladon, J.D. (1893). Souvenirs et Memoires. Geneva: Albert-Schuchardt.
Conant, J.B. (1957). Harvard case histories in experimental science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crawley, F.E. & Black, C.B. (1992). Causal modeling of secondary science students’ intentions to enroll in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(6), 585–599.
Drake, S. (1973). Galileo’s experimental confirmation of horizontal inertia: Unpublished manuscripts (Galileo gleanings XXII), Isis, 64(3), 291–305.
Drake, S. (1975). The Role of Music in Galileo’s Experiments. Scientific American 232, 98–104.
Edelson, D.C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(3), 355–385.
Eijck, van M. & Roth, W.M. (2009). Authentic science experiences as a vehicle to change students’ orientations toward science and scientific career choices: Learning from the path followed by Brad. Cultural Studies of Science Education 4(3), 611–638.
Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Development and Field Test of the Modified Draw-a- Scientist Test and the Draw-a-Scientist Rubric. School Science and Mathematics 112(2), 109–116.
Galilei, G. (1954). Dialogues concerning two new sciences. New York: Dover.
Galilei, G. (1967). Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students’ content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets- schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics 68, S13–S15.
Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2001). The Effect of a History-Based Course in Optics on Students’ Views about Science. Science & Education 10(1-2), 7–32.
Hannover, B. & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction 14(1), 51–67.
Heering, P. (2000). Getting Shocks: Teaching Secondary School Physics Through History. Science & Education 9(4), 363–373.
Holton, G. (1952), Introduction to concepts and theories in physical science. Reading, MA: Addison – Wesley.
Holton, G. (2003). The Project Physics Course, Then and Now. Science & Education 12(8), 779–786.
Irwin, A.R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education 84(1), 5–26.
Johnson, K., Adamson, S. & Williams, G. (2001). Spotlight Science 9. Second Edition. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Kintsch, W. & Dijk, van T.A. (1978). Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production. Psychological Review 85(5), 363–394.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Klopfer, L.E. & Cooley, W.W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists: A report on the HOSG instruction project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1(1), 33–47.
Klopfer, L.E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6(1), 87–95.
Kokkotas, P.V., Malamitsa, K.S. & Rizaki, A.A. (Editors). (2010). Adapting Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Koyre, A. (1968). Metaphysics and Measurement. Essays in Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Chapters I, II, III and IV.
Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal 3(2), 283–293. http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj3%282%29/20.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2012.
Krapp, A. & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on Interest in Science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education 33(1), 27–50.
Lavigne, G.L. & Vallerand, R.J. (2010). The Dynamic Processes of Influence Between Contextual and Situational Motivation: A Test of the Hierarchical Model in a Science Education Setting, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40(9), 2343–2359.
Lee, J.D. (1998). Which Kids Can “Become” Scientists? Effects of Gender, Self-Concepts, and Perceptions of Scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly 61(3), 199–219.
Leite, L. (2002). History of Science in Science Education: Development and Validation of a Checklist for Analyzing the Historical Content of Science Textbooks. Science & Education, 11(4), 333–359.
Leopold, C. & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction 22(1), 16–26.
Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2011). How can we motivate high school students to study science? Science Education International, 22(1), 5–17. http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/menu/staff/Rachel_Mamlok/. Accessed 8 December 2012.
Mamlok-Naaman, R., Ben-Zvi, R., Hofstein, A., Menis, J. & Erduran, S. (2005). Learning Science through a Historical Approach: Does It Affect the Attitudes of Non-Science-Oriented Students towards Science? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3(3), 485–507.
Matthews, M.R. (1994/2014). Science teaching. The role of history and philosophy of science. New York, London: Routledge.
Monk, M. & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education 81(4), 405–424.
Niaz, M. (2008). Physical science textbooks: history and philosophy of science. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Niaz, M. (2009). Critical Appraisal of Physical Science as a Human Enterprise: Dynamics of Scientific Progress. New York: Springer
Niaz, M. (2010). Innovating Science Teacher Education: A History and Philosophy of Science Perspective. New York: Routledge.
Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education 25(9), 1049–1079.
Picker, S.H. & Berry, J.S. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94.
Riess, F. (2000). History of Physics in Science Teacher Training in Oldenburg. Science & Education 9(4), 399–402.
Russell, T.L. (1981). What history of science, how much, and why? Science Education 65(1), 51–64.
Rutherford, F.J., Holton, G. & Watson, F.G. (1970). The Project Physics Course Text. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Schwamborn, A., Mayer, R.E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C. & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology 102(4), 872–879.
Seroglou, F. & Koumaras, K. (2001). The Contribution of the History of Physics in Physics Education: A Review. Science & Education 10(1–2), 153–172.
Shepardson, D.P., Choi, S., Niyogi, D. & Charusombat, U. (2011). Seventh grade students’ mental models of the greenhouse effect. Environmental Education Research 17(1), 1–17.
Slisko, J. & Hadzibegovic, Z. (2011). Cavendish Experiment in Physics Textbooks: Why do Authors Continue to Repeat a Denounced Error? European Journal of Physics Education 2(3), 20–32. http://ejpe.erciyes.edu.tr/index.php/EJPE/article/view/41/30. Accessed December 8 2012.
Solbes, J. & Traver, M. (2003). Against a Negative Image of Science: History of Science and the Teaching of Physics and Chemistry. Science & Education 12(7), 703–717.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L. & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(4), 409–421.
Wandersee, J.H. (1986). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students’ misconceptions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23(7), 581–597.
Wang, H.A. & Marsh, D.D. (2002). Science Instruction with a Humanistic Twist: Teachers’ Perception and Practice in Using the History of Science in Their Classrooms. Science & Education 11(2), 169–189.
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Prof. Gorazd Planinšič (University of Ljubljana) for his artwork in Fig. 65.7. Our thanks also go to Prof. Dewey I. Dykstra, Jr. (Boise State University), Prof. Chris Moore (Coastal Carolina University), and Dr Ioannis Papadopoulos (School of Primary Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) for their kind help in improving the English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slisko, J., Hadzibegovic, Z. (2014). History in Bosnia and Herzegovina Physics Textbooks for Primary School: Historical Accuracy and Cognitive Adequacy. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7653-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7654-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)