Skip to main content
  • 6284 Accesses

Abstract

Although there are quite a few directions in modern philosophy of mathematics that invoke some essential role for (quasi-)empirical material, this chapter will be devoted exclusively to what may be considered the seminal tradition. This enabled me to present the subject as one coherent whole and to forestall the discussion getting scattered in a diversity of directions without doing justice to any one of them.

Quasi-empiricism in this tradition is the view that the logic of mathematical inquiry is based, like the logic of scientific discovery, on the bottom-up retransmission of falsity (by means of counterexamples) rather than the top-down transmission of axiomatic truth. Imre Lakatos, who originally introduced the distinction between Euclidean and quasi-empirical theories, construed mathematics as a quasi-empirical science following in essence Popper’s method of conjectures and refutations. His essay on Proofs and Refutations was an attempt to apply, and thereby to test, Popper’s critical method and fallibilist theory of knowledge in a field – mathematics – to which it had not primarily been intended to apply. While Popper’s proposal stood up gloriously to this test, the new application gave rise also to new insights, in particular the construal of proofs as thought experiments with a role similar to that of testing and corroborating experiments in science.

After examination of a number of examples of mathematical thought-experiments from this perspective, the doctrine of the relative autonomy of objective knowledge is focussed upon, a doctrine which is part and parcel of the dialectic of proofs and refutations and hence of the quasi-empiricist programme.

Some remarks on the educational implications of quasi-empiricism conclude this chapter. These implications have no direct bearing on the actual practice of teaching mathematics in the classroom, but are mainly, if not exclusively, concerned with the image of mathematics that is conveyed in education.

Throughout this chapter, extensive use has been made of previous articles mentioned in the references.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chazan, D. (1990) ‘Quasi-Empirical Views of Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching’, Interchange 21, p. 14–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield, D. (1997) ‘Assaying Lakatos’s Philosophy of Mathematics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28, p. 99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield, D. (1998) ‘Beyond the Methodology of Mathematics Research Programmes’, Philosophia Mathematica 6, p. 272–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, E.J. (1987) Archimedes, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. (1975) ‘Galileo’s New Science of Motion’, p. 131–156 in: Monelli, M.N.R. & Shea, W.R. (eds.) Reason, Experiment, and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, Science History Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, E. (1995) ‘Kuhn, Lakatos, and the Image of Mathematics’, Philosophia Mathematica 3, p. 225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, E. (1999) ‘Thought Experimentation and Mathematical Innovation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30, p. 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, E. (2001) ‘The “Popperian Programme” and Mathematics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, p. 119–137, 355–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, E. (2006) ‘Mathematics as objective knowledge and as human practice’, in: R. Hersh (ed.), 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics, Springer, p. 289–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. & Remes, U. (1974) The Method of Analysis: its Geometrical Origin and its General Significance, Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, A.D. (ed.) (1990) Physicalism in Mathematics, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1963–64), ‘Proofs and Refutations’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14, p. 1–25, 120–139, 221–245, 296–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (ed.) (1967) Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1976), (Worral, J. & Zahar, E., eds.) Proofs and Refutations, the Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978a) (Worral, J. & Curry, G., eds.) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978b) (Worral, J. & Curry, G., eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. (1992) ‘Reality, Truth, and Confirmation in Mathematics’, p. 60–78 in: Echeverria, J., Ibarra, A. & Mormann, T. (eds.) The Space of Mathematics, De Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. & Panza, M. (eds.) (1996) Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics: History and Philosophy, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1957) How To Solve It, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1962) Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving, 2 vols, John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1968) Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning Volume II: Patterns of Plausible Inference, Princeton University Press (second edition)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1954) Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning Volume I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Princeton University Press (second edition Pólya 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1969) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 3rd ed., Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1972) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 6th ed., Hutchinson

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1981) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, revised ed., Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1983) Realism and the Aim of Science, ed. W. W. Bartley, Rowan and Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1984) Auf der Suche nach einer besseren Welt, Piper

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Further Reading

  • Brown, J.R. (1999) Philosophy of Mathematics: an introduction to the world of proofs and pictures, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield, D. (2003) Towards a Philosophy of Real Mathematics, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1997) ‘The Legacy of Lakatos: Reconceptualizing the Philosophy of Mathematics’, Philosophia Mathematica 5, p. 116–134

    Google Scholar 

  • François, K. & Van Bendegem, J.P. (eds.) (2007) Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavroglu, K., Goudraroulis, Y. & Nicolacopoulos, P. (eds.) (1989) Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, R. (2006) 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampis, G., Kvasz, L. & Stöltzner, M. (eds.) (2002) Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Larvor, B. (1998) Lakatos: An Introduction, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveri, G. (1997) ‘Criticism and the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge’, Philosophia Mathematica 5, p. 228–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveri, G. (2006) ‘Mathematics as a Quasi-Empirical Science’, Foundations of Science 11, p. 41–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Tymoczko, T. (ed.) (1986) New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics, Birkhäuser

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerkhove, B. (ed.) (2009) Mathematical Practices: Essays in Philosophy and History of Mathematics, World Scientific

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerkhove, B. & Van Bendegem, J.P. (eds.) (2007) Perspectives on Mathematical Practices: Bringing together Philosophy of Mathematics, Sociology of Mathematics, and Mathematics Education, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. (1990) ‘From the Logic of Mathematical Discovery to the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, p. 377–399

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduard Glas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glas, E. (2014). A Role for Quasi-Empiricism in Mathematics Education. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics