Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901.
Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr’s ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy, 18(4), 553–565.
Arthur, W. (2004). Biased embryos and evolution. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.
Banet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 373–407.
Battisti, B. T., Hanegan, N., Sudweeks, R., & Cates R. (2010). Using item response theory to conduct a distracter analysis on conceptual inventory of natural selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 845–868.
Beatty, J. (1994). The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biology and Philosophy, 9(3), 333–356.
Beggrow, E. P., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Students’ mental models of evolutionary causation: Natural selection and genetic drift. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(3), 429–444.
Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2012). For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson. Science Education, 96(5), 808–813.
Berti, A. E., Toneatti, L., & Rosati, V. (2010). Children’s conceptions about the origin of species: A study of Italian children’s conceptions with and without instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 506–538.
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427.
Bizzo, N., & El-Hani, C. N. (2009). Darwin and Mendel: Evolution and genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 108–114.
Bowler, P. J. (2003). Evolution: The history of an idea. (3rd edn.). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Bowler, P. J. (2005). Revisiting the eclipse of Darwinism. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 19–32.
Bowler, P. J. (1983). The eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian evolution theories in the decades around 1900. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brandon, R. N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brigandt I. (2013a) Explanation in biology: reduction, pluralism, and explanatory aims. Science & Education, 22(1), 69–91.
Brigandt, I. (2013b). Intelligent design and the nature of science: philosophical and pedagogical points. In K. Kampourakis (Ed), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators.. Dordrecht: Springer, 205–238.
Brumby, M. (1979). Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 13(2), 119–122.
Burkhardt, R. W. (1995). The spirit of system: Lamarck and evolutionary biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 447–451.
Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 551–582.
Clough, E. E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). Children’s understanding of inheritance. Journal of Biological Education, 19(4), 304–310.
Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: Transformist concepts in European natural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 67–83.
Corsi, P. (2001). Lamarck: Gene’se et enjeux du transformisme, 1770–1830. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
Deadman, J., & Kelly, P. P. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics? Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), 7–15.
Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G. & Peebles, P. (1996). Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 407–431.
Depew D. (2013) Conceptual change and the rhetoric of evolutionary theory: ‘Force talk’ as a case study and challenge for science pedagogy. In K. Kampourakis (Ed), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators Dordrecht: Springer.
Endersby, J. (2009). Darwin on generation, pangenesis and sexual selection. In J. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd edn.) (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engels, E. M., & Glick, T. F. (2008). The reception of Charles Darwin in Europe (Vol. 2). London: Continuum.
Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263–294). New York: Routledge.
Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A., Gram, W., Frazier, B. F., Tare, M., Thompson, S. & Diamond, J. (2010). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 326–353.
Forber, P. (2005). On the explanatory roles of natural selection. Biology and Philosophy, 20(2), 329–342.
Forber, P. (2010). Confirmation and explaining how possible. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41, 32–40.
Forber, P. (2012). Modeling scientific evidence: The challenge of specifying likelihoods. EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009, 1, 55–65.
Forber, P., & Griffith, E. (2011). Historical reconstruction: Gaining epistemic access to the deep past. Philosophy & Theory in Biology, 3, e203.
Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and scientific understanding. The Journal of Philosophy, 71(1), 5–19.
Gauld, C. (1991). History of science, individual development and science teaching. Research in Science Education, 21, 133–140.
Geraedts, C. L., & Boersma, K. T. (2006). Reinventing natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 843–870.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
González Galli, L. M., & Meinardi, E. N. (2011). The role of teleological thinking in learning the Darwinian model of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4,145–152.
Gotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. (2010). Reasoning up and down a food chain: Using an assessment framework to investigate students’ middle knowledge. Science Education, 94(2), 259–281.
Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 581–598.
Gregory, T. R. (2008). Evolution as fact, theory, and path. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 46–52.
Gregory T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 156–175.
Greiffenhagen, C., & Sherman, W. (2008). Kuhn and conceptual change: On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children. Science & Education, 17, 1–26.
Hempel, C. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.
Hodge, J., & Radick, G. (2009). Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1996). Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 879–900.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Teaching evolution using a historically rich curriculum and paired problem solving instructional strategy. The American Biology Teacher, 59(4), 208–212.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories: A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51–61.
Kampourakis, K. (2006). The finches beaks: Introducing evolutionary concepts. Science Scope, 29(6), 14–17.
Kampourakis, K. (2013a) Mendel and the path to Genetics: Portraying science as a social process. Science & Education, 22(2), 293–324.
Kampourakis, K. (2013b) Teaching about adaptation: why evolutionary history matters. Science & Education, 22(2), 173–188.
Kampourakis K. (Ed) (2013c), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students’ preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16(3–5), 393–422.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27–47.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education, 18(10), 1313–1340.
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48(4), 507–531.
Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (vol. 13): Scientific explanation (pp. 410–505), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996) . The structure of scientific revolutions. (3rd edn.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2011). Cause and effect in biology revisited: Is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science, 334, 1512–1516.
Lennox J.G. and Kampourakis K. (2013) Biological teleology: the need for history. In K. Kampourakis (Ed), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer.
Levine, A. T. (2000). Which way is up? Thomas S. Kuhn’s analogy to conceptual development in Childhood. Science & Education, 9, 107–122.
Lewis, D. (1986). Causation. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Philosophical papers, vol. II (pp. 159–213), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewontin, R. C. (1969). The bases of conflict in biological explanation. Journal of the History of Biology, 2(1), 35–45.
Lombrozo, T., & Carey, S. (2006). Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition, 99, 167–204.
Love, A. C. (2013). Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo. Science & Education, 22(2), 255–278.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayr, E. (2002). What evolution is. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78.
Minelli, A. (2009). Forms of becoming: The evolutionary biology of development. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, G., & Skinner, J. D. (2003). On the origin, evolution and phylogeny of giraffes Giraffa camelopardalis. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. 58(1), 51–73.
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237–256.
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272.
Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: Diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS Instrument. The American Biology Teacher, 74(2), 92–98.
Nehm, R. H., Kim, S. Y., & Sheppard, K. (2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: Biology versus non biology teachers. Science Education, 93, 1122–1146.
Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of science: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777.
Passmore, C. & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204.
Passmore, C., Stewart, J., & Zoellner, B. (2005). Providing high school students with opportunities to reason like evolutionary biologists. The American Biology Teacher, 67(4), 214–221.
Pazza, R., Penteado, P. R., & Kavalco, K. F. (2010). Misconceptions about evolution in Brazilian freshmen students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(1), 107–113.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Prinou, L., Halkia, L., & Skordoulis, C. (2011). The inability of primary school to introduce children to the theory of biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(2), 275–285.
Reydon, T. A. C. (2012). How-possibly explanations as genuine explanations and helpful heuristics: A comment on Forber. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 302–310.
Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction. (2nd edn.) London: Routledge.
Rudolph, J. L., & Stewart, J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: on the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1069–1089.
Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Salmon, W. C. (1990). Four decades of scientific explanation. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 13: Scientific Explanation (pp. 3–219), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 147–177.
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55.
Scriven, M. (1959). Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. Science, 130, 477–482.
Scriven, M. (1969). Explanation in the biological sciences. Journal of the History of Biology, 2(1), 187–198.
Settlage Jr, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense‐making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449–457.
Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 539–571.
Strevens, M. (2009). Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tavares M. L., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Mortimer E. F. (2010). Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 573–598.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
van Dijk E. M., & Reydon, T. A. C. (2010). A conceptual analysis of evolutionary theory for teacher education. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 655–677.
van Dijk E. M. (2009). Teachers’ views on understanding evolutionary theory: A PCK-study in the framework of the ERTE-model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 259–267.
Vosniadou S. (2012) Reframing the classical approach to conceptual change: Preconceptions, misconceptions and synthetic models. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.). Second international handbook of science education (pp. 119–130). Dordrehct: Springer.
Waters, C. K. (2009). The arguments in The Origin of Species. In J. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.). Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd edn.) (pp. 120–143). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Winther, R. (2000). Darwin on variation and heredity. Journal of the History of Biology, 33, 425–455.
Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zabel, J., & Gropengiesser, H. (2011). Learning progress in evolution theory: Climbing a ladder or roaming a landscape? Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 143–149.