The Place of the History of Chemistry in the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry

  • Kevin C. de Berg


To those of us who are sold on history, it may seem non-controversial to suggest that the learning and teaching of chemistry should give cognisance to the historical development of the subject. However, this suggestion is proving controversial amongst some in the chemistry profession. For example, in the October 2010 edition of Chemistry in Australia, Rami Ibo takes issue with the emphasis on the history of science in the HSC chemistry curriculum (Year 12) in New South Wales. He studied chemistry, physics and biology for his HSC in NSW and concluded that, because the primary focus of these three sciences was History of Science, ‘There was hardly any content that challenged our minds, and calculations barely involved plugging in numbers into an equation…. We were required to recall Antoine Lavoisier’s experiments that led to the theories of acids and bases… while my friends in Lebanon were studying ideal gas laws, chemical kinetics, acids and bases, organic chemistry, soaps and detergents, medicinal chemistry and new materials’ (Ibo, Chemistry in Australia 77(9): 5, 2010). What does the literature have to say in response to such arguments? Does the presence of the history of chemistry in a curriculum necessarily reduce important content and problem-solving skills?

A study of the literature suggests at least three reasons for persisting with aspects of the history of chemistry in the learning and teaching of chemistry.
  1. 1.

    The fact that student conceptions sometimes recapitulate early ideas found in the history of chemistry is seen as offering teachers a means of a deeper understanding of student ideas with the potential for more positive learning outcomes.

  2. 2.

    Conceptual clarity is more easily achieved within an historical context. Often conceptual usefulness is pursued at the expense of conceptual depth (de Berg, Conceptual Depth and Conceptual Usefulness in Chemistry: Issues and Challenges for Chemistry Educators. In I. V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science Education in the 21st Century (pp. 165–182). New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2008a).

  3. 3.

    The history of chemistry directly gives us some idea of the epistemological status of chemistry within science and knowledge in general and therefore gives a student access to aspects of the Nature of Science.


This review chapter also examines different ways the history of chemistry has been incorporated into chemistry curricula and looks at the purported advantages, disadvantages and limitations of such attempts. Some directions for future research in this area are included in the chapter.


Historical Approach Historical Material Conceptual Clarity Chemical Knowledge Pedagogical History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of History of Science courses on students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The Impact of a philosophy of science course on pre-service science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15–42.Google Scholar
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.G. (2000). The Influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils’ conceptions of matter and its transformation. Studies in Science Education, 18, 53–85.Google Scholar
  5. Atkins, P. & de Paula, J. (2010). Atkins’ Physical Chemistry (9th edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barariski, A. (2012). The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A Way to Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(1), 97–102.Google Scholar
  7. Benfey, T. (2007). Book Review: Mendeleev on the Periodic Law: Selected Writings 1869–1905 (William Jensen ed.). Journal of Chemical Education, 84(8), 1279.Google Scholar
  8. Bertomeu-Sanchez, J.R.B. & Garcia-Belmar, A.G. (2006). Pedro Gutierrez Buenos Textbooks: Audiences, Teaching Practices and the Chemical Revolution. Science & Education, 15(7–8), 693–712.Google Scholar
  9. Boulabiar, A., Bouraoui, K., Chastrette, M. & Abderrabba, M. (2004). A Historical Analysis of the Daniell Cell and Electrochemistry Teaching in French and Tunisian Textbooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(5), 754.Google Scholar
  10. Brito, A., Rodriguez, M.A. & Niaz, M. (2005). A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 84–111.Google Scholar
  11. Byers, K. & Bourgoin, M. (Eds.). (1998). Encylopedia of World Biography ( 2nd edition). Detroit, Michigan: Gale Group.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, J. (1999). Rutherford, Scientist Supreme. Christchurch, New Zealand: AAS Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, F.A. & Seeman, J.I. (2001). Placing Science into Its Human Context: Using Scientific Autobiography to Teach Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(12), 1618–1622.Google Scholar
  14. Cavendish, H. (1785). Experiments on Air. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 74, 372–384.Google Scholar
  15. Chalmers, A. (1998). Retracing the Ancient Steps to Atomic Theory. Science & Education, 7(1), 69–84.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, R.W. (2001). The Physics Teacher: Faraday as a Lecturer. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(4), 449.Google Scholar
  17. Clausius, R. (1857). On the Nature of the Motion which we call Heat. Annalen, 50, 108–127.Google Scholar
  18. Clericuzio, A. (2006). Teaching Chemistry and Chemical Textbooks in France from Beguin to Lemery. Science & Education, 15(2–4), 335–355.Google Scholar
  19. Clough, M. (2009). Humanizing Science to Improve Post-Secondary Science Education. Paper presented at the 10th IHPST Conference, June 24–28, University of Notre Dame, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Coffey, P. (2008). Cathedrals of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Conant, J.B. (1951). On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  22. Cotignola, M., Bordogna, C., Punte, G. & Cappinnini, O.M. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts: Are they linked to the Historical Development of this Field. Science & Education, 11(3), 279–291.Google Scholar
  23. Crawford, E. (1996). Arrhenius: From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect. Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Davenport, D.A. (2002). Major Additions to the Linus Pauling Canon. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(8), 946.Google Scholar
  25. David, C.W. (2006). Boltzmann without Lagrange. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(11), 1695.Google Scholar
  26. de Berg, K.C. (1989). The Emergence of Quantification in the Pressure-Volume Relationship for Gases: A Textbook Analysis. Science Education, 73(2), 115–134.Google Scholar
  27. de Berg, K.C. (1995). Revisiting the Pressure-Volume Law in History-What can it Teach us about the Emergence of Mathematical Relationships in Science? Science & Education, 4(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
  28. de Berg, K.C. (1997a). The Development of the Concept of Work: A Case where History can inform Pedagogy. Science & Education, 6(5), 511–527.Google Scholar
  29. de Berg, K.C. (1997b). Student Responses to a Pedagogical History of the Pressure-Volume Law. In I. Winchester (Ed.), Toward Scientific Literacy-Proceedings of the 4th IHPST Conference (pp. 178–187). University of Calgary.Google Scholar
  30. de Berg, K.C. (2003). The Development of the Theory of Electrolytic Dissociation. Science & Education, 12(4), 397–419.Google Scholar
  31. de Berg, K.C. (2004). The Development and Use of a Pedagogical History for a key Chemical Idea-The case of ions in solution. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 64, 16–19.Google Scholar
  32. de Berg, K.C. (2006). The Kinetic-Molecular and Thermodynamic approaches to Osmotic Pressure: A study of dispute in physical chemistry and the implications for chemistry education. Science & Education, 15(5), 495–519.Google Scholar
  33. de Berg, K.C. (2008a). Conceptual Depth and Conceptual Usefulness in Chemistry: Issues and Challenges for Chemistry Educators. In I.V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science Education in the 21st Century (pp. 165–182). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. de Berg, K.C. (2008b). The Concepts of Heat and Temperature: The Problem of Determining the Content for the Construction of an Historical Case Study which is sensitive to Nature of Science Issues and Teaching-Learning Issues. Science & Education, 17(1), 75–114.Google Scholar
  35. de Berg, K.C. (2008c). Tin Oxide Chemistry from Macquer (1758) to Mendeleeff (1891) as revealed in the textbooks and other literature of the era. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 265–287.Google Scholar
  36. de Berg, K.C. (2010). Tin Oxide Chemistry from the Last Decade of the Nineteenth Century to the First Decade of the Twenty-First Century: Towards the Development of a Big-Picture Approach to the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry While Focussing on a Specific Compound or Class of Compounds. Science & Education, 19(9), 847–866.Google Scholar
  37. de Berg, K.C. (2011). Joseph Priestley across Theology, Education, and Chemistry: An Interdisciplinary Case Study in Epistemology with a Focus on the Science Education Context. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 805–830.Google Scholar
  38. Diamente, D. (2000). Boerhaave on Fire. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 42.Google Scholar
  39. DiSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225.Google Scholar
  40. Eggen, P., Kvittingen, L., Lykknes, A. & Wittje, R. (2012). Reconstructing Iconic Experiments in Electrochemistry: Experiences from a HOS Course. Science & Education, 21(2), 179–189.Google Scholar
  41. Furio-Mas, C.J., Hernandez-Perez, J.H. & Harris, H.H. (1987). Parallels between Adolescents’ Conception of Gases and the History of Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(7), 616–618.Google Scholar
  42. Furio-Mas, C.J., Azcona, R., Guisasola, J. & Ratcliffe, M. (2000). Difficulties in teaching the Concepts Amount of Substance and the Mole. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1285–1304.Google Scholar
  43. Garnett, P.J., Garnett, P.J. & Hackling, M.W. (1995). Students’ Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: a Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69–95.Google Scholar
  44. Gislason, E.A. & Craig, N.C. (2011). The Global Formulation of Thermodynamics and the First Law: 50 years on. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1525–1530.Google Scholar
  45. Giunta, C.J. (1998). Using History To Teach Scientific Method: The Case of Argon. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(10), 1322–1325.Google Scholar
  46. Giunta, C.J. (2001). Using History to Teach Scientific Method: The Role of Errors. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 623–627.Google Scholar
  47. Goldsmith, B. (2005). Obsessive Genius-The Inner World of Marie Curie. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  48. Griffith, A.K. & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628.Google Scholar
  49. Hadzidaki, P. (2008). Quantum Mechanics and Scientific Explanation: An Explanatory Strategy Aiming at Providing Understanding. Science & Education, 17(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
  50. Harris, H. (2006). Book Review: Fritz Haber: Chemist, Nobel Laureate, German, Jew. A Biography by Dietrich Stoltzenberg. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(11), 1605.Google Scholar
  51. Hines, W.G. & de Levie, R. (2010). The Early Development of electronic pH meters. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(11), 1143–1153.Google Scholar
  52. Holme, T. & Murphy, K. (2011). Assessing Conceptual and Algorithmic Knowledge in General Chemistry with ACS Exams. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(9), 1217–1222.Google Scholar
  53. Holton, G. (1978). Subelectrons, presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 9, 161–224.Google Scholar
  54. Hunter, M. (2009). Boyle: Between God and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Hutchinson, J.S. (1997). Case Studies in Chemistry (4th edition). Alliance Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hutchinson, J.S. (2000). Teaching Introductory Chemistry using Concept Development Case Studies: Interactive and Inductive Learning. University Chemistry Education, 4(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  57. Ibo, R. (2010). Chemistry Curriculum. Chemistry in Australia, 77(9), 5.Google Scholar
  58. Irwin, A.R. (2000). Historical case Studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
  59. Jensen, W.B. (1998a). Logic, History, and the chemistry textbook I: Does Chemistry have a logical Structure? Journal of Chemical Education, 75(6), 679–687.Google Scholar
  60. Jensen, W.B. (1998b). Logic, History, and the chemistry textbook II: Can we unmuddle the Chemistry Textbook? Journal of Chemical Education, 75(7), 817–828.Google Scholar
  61. Jensen, W.B. (1998c). Logic, History, and the chemistry textbook III: One chemical revolution or three? Journal of Chemical Education, 75(8), 961–969.Google Scholar
  62. Jensen, W.B. (2004). Did Lavoisier blink? Journal of Chemical Education, 81(5), 629.Google Scholar
  63. Jensen, W.B. (2005a). The Origin of the Bunsen Burner. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 518.Google Scholar
  64. Jensen, W.B. (2005b). The Origin of the 18-Electron Rule. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 28.Google Scholar
  65. Jensen, W.B. (2006a). The Origin of the Liebig Condenser. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 23.Google Scholar
  66. Jensen, W.B. (2006b). The Origin of the term “Allotrope”. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(6), 838.Google Scholar
  67. Jensen, W.B. (2007a). The Origin of the s, p, d, f orbital labels. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(5), 757.Google Scholar
  68. Jensen, W.B. (2007b). The Origin of the names Malic, Maleic, and Malonic Acid. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(6), 924.Google Scholar
  69. Jensen, W.B. (2008a). The Origin of the Polymer concept. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(5), 624.Google Scholar
  70. Jensen, W.B. (2008b). The Origin of the Rubber Policeman. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 776.Google Scholar
  71. Jensen, W.B. (2009a). The Origin of the Metallic Bond. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(3), 278.Google Scholar
  72. Jensen, W.B. (2009b). The Origin of the Circle Symbol for Aromaticity. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(4), 423.Google Scholar
  73. Jensen, W.B. (2010a). Why has the value of Avogadro’s Constant changed over time? Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1302.Google Scholar
  74. Jensen, W.B. (2010b). Why is R used to symbolise Hydrocarbon substituents? Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 360–361.Google Scholar
  75. Jensen, W.B. (2010c). Why are q and Q used to symbolise heat? Journal of Chemical Education, 87(11), 1142.Google Scholar
  76. Jensen, W.B. (2010d). The Origin of the Ionic-Radius ratio. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(6), 587–588.Google Scholar
  77. Jensen, W.B. (2010e). The Origin of the Name “Onion’s Fusible Alloy”. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(10), 1050–1051.Google Scholar
  78. Jensen, W.B. (2011). The Origin of Isotope Symbolism. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(1), 22–23Google Scholar
  79. Jensen, W.B. (2012). The Quantification of Electronegativity: Some Precursors. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(1), 94–96.Google Scholar
  80. Justi, R. & Gilbert, J.K. (1999). History and Philosophy of Science through Models: The Case of Chemical Kinetics. Science & Education, 8(3), 287–307.Google Scholar
  81. Justi, R. & Gilbert, J.K. (2000). History and Philosophy of Science through Models: Some challenges in the case of ‘the atom’. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993–1009.Google Scholar
  82. Kauffman, G.B. (1989). History in the Chemistry Curriculum. Interchange, 20(2), 81–94.Google Scholar
  83. Kauffman, G.B. (2008a). Moses Gomberg (1866–1947), Father of Organic Free Radical Chemistry: A Retrospective View on the 60th Anniversary of his Death. Chemical Educator, 13(1), 28–33.Google Scholar
  84. Kauffman, G.B. (2008b). Antoine Henri Becquerel (1852–1908), Discoverer of Natural Radioactivity: A Retrospective View on the Centenary of His Death. Chemical Educator, 13(2), 102–110.Google Scholar
  85. Kauffman, G.B. (2008c). Frederic Joliot (1900–1958), Codiscoverer of Artificial Radioactivity: A Retrospective View on the 50th Anniversary of his Death. Chemical Educator, 13(3), 161–169.Google Scholar
  86. Kauffman, G.B. (2008d). Gerald Schwarzenbach (1904–1978) and the School of Anorganische Chemie at the Universitat Zurich, Heir Apparent to Alfred Werner (1866–1919). Chemical Educator, 13(6), 365–373.Google Scholar
  87. Kauffman, G.B. (2009). Dwaine O. Cowan (1935–2006): The Father of Organic Conductors & Superconductors. Chemical Educator, 14(3), 118–129.Google Scholar
  88. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2008a). Arthur Kornberg (1918–2007), Precursor of DNA Synthesis. Chemical Educator, 13(1): 34–41.Google Scholar
  89. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2008b). Fred Allison’s Magneto-Optic Search for Elements 85 and 87. Chemical Educator, 13(6), 358–364.Google Scholar
  90. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2009). The 2008 Nobel Prize in Chemistry: Osamu Shimomura, Martin Chalfie & Roger Y Tsien: The green Fluorescent Protein. Chemical Educator, 14(2), 70–78.Google Scholar
  91. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2010a). Alfred G. Maddock (1917–2009), An Inspired Radiochemist. Chemical Educator, 15, 237–242.Google Scholar
  92. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2010b). Marie and Pierre Curie’s 1903 Nobel Prize. Chemical Educator, 15, 344–352.Google Scholar
  93. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2011a). Marie Curie’s 1911 Nobel Prize. Chemical Educator, 16, 29–40.Google Scholar
  94. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2011b). Robert Wilhelm Eberhard Bunsen (1811–1899), Inspired 19th century chemist: A Retrospective View on the Bicentennial of his Birth. Chemical Educator, 16, 119–128.Google Scholar
  95. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2011c). Nobel Laureate John Bennett Fenn (1917–2010), Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Pioneer. Chemical Educator, 16, 143–148.Google Scholar
  96. Kauffman, G.B. & Adloff, J. (2011d). William Nunn Lipscomb, Jr (1919–2011), Nobel Laureate and Borane Chemistry Pioneer: An Obituary-Tribute. Chemical Educator, 16, 195–201.Google Scholar
  97. Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances. Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas’. A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry (2nd edition). Consulted on 27th March 2012.
  98. Klassen, S. (2009). Identifying and addressing student difficulties with the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment. Science & Education, 18, 593–607.Google Scholar
  99. Kousathana, M., Demerouti, M. & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Instructional Misconceptions in Acid–base Equilibria: an analysis from a History and Philosophy of Science Perspective. Science & Education, 14(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
  100. Kovac, J. (2004). The Chemcraft Story: The Legacy of Harold Porter. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(4), 489.Google Scholar
  101. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  102. Lagi, M. & Chase, R.S. (2009). Distillation: Integration of a historical perspective. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 70, 5–10.Google Scholar
  103. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research Programmes. In I .Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Lederman, N.G. (2006). Research on Nature of Science: Reflections on the Past, Anticipations of the Future. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  105. Lin, H. (1998). The Effectiveness of Teaching Chemistry through the History of Science. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(10), 1326–1330.Google Scholar
  106. Lin, H. & Chen, C. (2002). Promoting pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.Google Scholar
  107. Lin, H., Hung, J. & Hung, S. (2002). Using the history of science to promote students’ problem-solving ability. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 453–464.Google Scholar
  108. Machamer, P., Pera, M. & Baltas, A. (Eds.). (2000). Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Marshall, J.L. (2003). Oliver Sacks in Mendeleev’s Garden. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), 879.Google Scholar
  110. Matthews, M.R. (2009). Science and Worldviews in the Classroom: Joseph Priestley and Photosynthesis. In M. Matthews (Ed.), Science, Worldviews and Education., Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  111. McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M.P. (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511–532.Google Scholar
  112. Moore, C.E., Jaselskis, B. & Florian, J. (2010). Historical Development of the hydrogen ion concept. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(9), 922–923.Google Scholar
  113. Nakhleh, M.B. (1993). Are our students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52–55.Google Scholar
  114. Nakhleh, M.B., Lowrey, K.A. & Mitchel, R.C. (1996). Narrowing the gap between Concepts and Algorithms in Freshman Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(8), 758–762.Google Scholar
  115. Niaz, M. (1995a). Chemical equilibrium and Newton’s Third Law of Motion: Ontogeny/Phylogeny Revisited. Interchange, 26(1), 19–32.Google Scholar
  116. Niaz, M. (1995b). Progressive Transitions from Algorithmic to Conceptual Understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: A Lakatosian Interpretation. Science Education, 79, 19–36.Google Scholar
  117. Niaz, M. (2000a). Gases as Idealized Lattices: A Rational Reconstruction of Students’ Understanding of the Behaviour of Gases. Science & Education, 9(3), 279–287.Google Scholar
  118. Niaz, M. (2000b). The Oil Drop Experiment: A Rational Reconstruction of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Controversy and Its Implications for Chemistry Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 480–508.Google Scholar
  119. Niaz, M. (2001a). A Rational Reconstruction of the origin of the Covalent Bond and its implications for General Chemistry Textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 623–641.Google Scholar
  120. Niaz, M. (2001b). Understanding nature of science as progressive transitions in heuristic principles. Science Education, 85, 684–690.Google Scholar
  121. Niaz, M. (2008). Teaching General Chemistry: A History and Philosophy of Science Approach. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  122. Niaz, M. (2009). Critical Appraisal of Physical Science as a Human Enterprise: Dynamics of Scientific Progress. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  123. Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A. & Liendo, G. (2002). Arguments, contradictions, resistances and conceptual change in students’ understanding of atomic structure. Science Education, 86, 505–525.Google Scholar
  124. Niaz, M. & Cardellini, L. (2011). What can the Bohr-Sommerfeld Model show students of chemistry in the 21st century. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(2), 240–243.Google Scholar
  125. Niaz, M. & Rodriguez, M.A. (2001). Do we have to introduce history and philosophy of science or is it already ‘inside’ chemistry? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 159–164.Google Scholar
  126. Niaz, M. & Rodriguez, M.A. (2002). How in spite of the Rhetoric, History of Chemistry has been ignored in presenting Atomic Structure in Textbooks. Science & Education, 11(5), 423–441.Google Scholar
  127. Niaz, M. & Rodriguez, M.A. (2005). The Oil Drop Experiment: Do Physical Chemistry Textbooks refer to its Controversial Nature? Science & Education, 14(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  128. Nicholson, R.M. & Nicholson, J.W. (2012). Martha Whiteley of Imperial College London. A Pioneering Woman Chemist. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(5), 598–601.Google Scholar
  129. Nieto, R., Gonzalez, C., Jimenez, A., Lopez, I. & Rodriguez, J. (2011). A Missing Deduction of the Clausius Equality and Inequality. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(5), 597–601.Google Scholar
  130. Nobel Prize in Chemistry (2011)., consulted on 27 April 2012.
  131. Nurrenbem, S.C. & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508–510.Google Scholar
  132. Padilla, K. & Furio-Mas, C. (2008). The Importance of HPS in Correcting Distorted Views of ‘Amount of Substance’ and ‘Mole’ Concepts in Chemistry Teaching. Science & Education, 17(4), 403–424.Google Scholar
  133. Partington, J.R. (1953). A Textbook of Inorganic Chemistry (6th edition). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  134. Peterson, A.R. (2004). The “Dissing” of Niels Bohr. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(1), 33.Google Scholar
  135. Pfaundler, L. (1867). Beitrage zur Chemischen Statik [Contribution to chemical statics]. Poggendorfs Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 131, 55–85.Google Scholar
  136. Piaget, J. & Garcia, R. (1980). Psicogenesis e historia de la ciencia, Siglo XXI, Mexico. Translated by Helga Feider (1988, 2nd English edition) as, Psychogenesis and the History of Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  137. Pickering, M. (1990). Further Studies on Concept Learning versus Problem Solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 254–255.Google Scholar
  138. Quilez, J. (2009). From Chemical Forces to Chemical Rates: A Historical/Philosophical Foundation for the Teaching of Chemical Equilibrium. Science & Education, 18(9), 1203–1251.Google Scholar
  139. Raoult, F.M. (1882a). Loi de congélation des solutions aqueuses des matières Organiques. Comptes Rendus, 94, 1517.Google Scholar
  140. Raoult, F.M. (1882b). Loi générale de congélation des dissolvants. Comptes Rendus, 95, 1030.Google Scholar
  141. Raoult, F.M. (1884). Loi générale des congélations des dissolvants. Annales de chimie et de physique, 2(vi), 66.Google Scholar
  142. Rasmussen, S.C. (2007). The History of Science as a Tool to Identify and Confront Pseudoscience. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(6), 949–951.Google Scholar
  143. Rayleigh, J.W. & Ramsay, W. (1895). Argon, a New Constituent of the Atmosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 186, 187–241.Google Scholar
  144. Reeves, R. (2008). A Force of Nature: The Frontier Genius of Ernest Rutherford. New York: W.W Norton,Google Scholar
  145. Rosenberg, R.M. (2010). From Joule to Caratheodory and Born: A Conceptual Evolution of the First Law of Thermodynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(7), 691–693.Google Scholar
  146. Sakkopoulos, S.A. & Vitoratos, E.G. (1996). Empirical Foundations of Atomism in ancient Greek philosophy. Science & Education, 5(3), 293–303.Google Scholar
  147. Sanmarti, N. & Izquierdo, M. (1995). The substantialisation of properties in pupils’ thinking and in the history of chemistry. Science & Education, 4(4), 349–369.Google Scholar
  148. Scerri, E.R. (2007). The Periodic Table-Its Story and Its Significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Scerri, E.R. (2009). Selected Papers on the Periodic Table. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  150. Scheffel, L., Brockmeier, W. & Parchmann, I. (2009). Historical Material in Macro-Micro Thinking: Conceptual Change in Chemistry Education and the History of Chemistry. In J.K. Gilbert & D.F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  151. Schmidt, H.J. (1992). Harte Nusse im Chemieunterricht [Tough Nuts in Chemistry Classroom]. Frankfurt: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
  152. Schofield, R.E. (1997). The enlightenment of Joseph Priestley. A study of his life and work from 1733–1773. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Schofield, R.E. (2004). The enlightenment of Joseph Priestley. A study of his life and work from 1773–1804. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  154. Schwartz, A.T. (2004). Gehennical Fire: The lives of George Starkey, an American alchemist in the Scientific Revolution. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(7), 953.Google Scholar
  155. Seligardi, R. (2006). Views of Chemistry and Chemical Theories: A Comparison between two University Textbooks in the Bolognese Context at the beginning of the 19th century. Science & Education, 15(7–8), 713–737.Google Scholar
  156. Sharma, V., McKone, H.T. & Markow, P.G. (2011). A Global Perspective on the History, Use, and Identification of Synthetic Food Dyes. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(1), 24–28.Google Scholar
  157. Souza, K. & Porto, P.A. (2012). History and Epistemology of Science in the Classroom: The Synthesis of Quinine as a Proposal. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(1), 58–63.Google Scholar
  158. Sturm, J.E. (2000). Ernest Rutherford, Avogadro’s Number, and Chemical Kinetics Revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(10), 1278.Google Scholar
  159. Taber, K.S. (1997). Understanding Chemical Bonding. Non-published PhD Thesis, Roehampton Institute, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  160. Taber, K.S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597–608.Google Scholar
  161. Taber, K.S. (2002). Chemical Misconceptions-Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  162. Taber, K.S. & Garcia-Franco, A. (2010). Learning processes in chemistry. Drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about the particulate structure of matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 99–142.Google Scholar
  163. Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169.Google Scholar
  164. Treagust, D.F. (1995). Diagnostic Assessment of Students’ Science Knowledge. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning Science in the Schools. Research Reforming Practice (pp. 327–346). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  165. Valeur, B. & Berberan-Santos, M.N. (2011). A Brief History of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence before the emergence of Quantum Theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 731–738.Google Scholar
  166. Van Berkel, B., De Vos, W., Verdonk, A.H. & Pilot, A. (2000). Normal Science Educaton and its Dangers: The Case of School Chemistry. Science & Education, 9(1–2), 123–159.Google Scholar
  167. Van Driel, J.H., De Vos, W. & Verloop, N. (1998). Relating Students’ Reasoning to the History of Science: The Case of Chemical Equilibrium. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
  168. Viana, H.E.B. & Porto, P.A. (2010). The Development of Dalton’s Atomic Theory as a Case Study in the history of science: Reflections for Educators in Chemistry. Science & Education, 19(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
  169. Wandersee, J.H. & Baudoin-Griffard, P. (2002). The History of Chemistry: Potential and Actual Contributions to Chemical Education. In J.K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D.F. Treagust & J.H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  170. Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J. & Novak, J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan publishing.Google Scholar
  171. Williams, L.P. (1965). Michael Faraday-A Biography. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  172. Williams, K.R. (2003). The Discovery of Oxygen and other Priestley Matters. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(10), 1129.Google Scholar
  173. Williams, K.R. (2009). Robert Boyle: The Founder of Modern Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(2), 148.Google Scholar
  174. Williamson, A.W. (1851–1854). Suggestions for the dynamics of chemistry derived from the theory of etherification. Notices of the Proceedings at the meetings of the Members of the Royal Institution, 1, 90–94.Google Scholar
  175. Wilson, D. (1983). Rutherford: Simple Genius. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  176. Woody, A.I. (2011). How is the Ideal Gas Law Explanatory? Science & Education, online first 6/12/2011.Google Scholar
  177. Zoller, U., Lubezky, A., Nakhleh, M.B., Tessler, B. & Dori, Y.J. (1995). Success on Algorithmic and LOCS vs. Conceptual Chemistry Exam Questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 72, 987–989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science and MathematicsAvondale College of Higher EducationCooranbongAustralia

Personalised recommendations