Motivation in the Science Classroom: Through a Lens of Equity and Social Justice

Chapter

Abstract

It is imperative that science teacher educators address strategies for motivating and enhancing the participation of traditionally underrepresented students in the STEM pipeline. Unfortunately, although there is a vast amount of research and literature on motivation in education, there are still gaps in the literature relative to motivating students from traditionally underrepresented and marginalized groups to participate in science. In an increasingly technological and global society, it is essential to address strategies that promote equity and social justice in science teaching in an effort to increase the achievement of students from traditionally underrepresented and marginalized groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) areas. This chapter outlines effective strategies for motivating students in the science classroom.

Keywords

Science Classroom Student Motivation Science Teacher Educator Underrepresented Group Science Learning Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261.Google Scholar
  2. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J., & Klinger, D. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology Education, 14, 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzi, H. J., Ben‐Zvi, R., & Ganiel, U. (1986). Forgetting versus savings: The many facets of long‐term retention. Science Education, 70(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atwater, M., & Simpson, R. (1984). Cognitive and affective variables affecting Black freshman in science and engineering at a predominantly White university. School Science and Mathematics, 84(2), 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atwater, M. (2000). Equity for Black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84, 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumenfeld, P., & Meece, J. (1987). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students involvement and use of learning strategies in science. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun, H., Chapman, L., & Vezzu, S. (2010). The black-white achievement gap revisited. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(21), 1–98.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, E., & Burgess, D. (2005). Professor’s role in motivating students to attend class. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(3), 23–47.Google Scholar
  11. Britner, S., & Pajares, E. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271–285.Google Scholar
  12. Britner, S., & Pajares, E. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middles school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Madison, WI: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, M. (2000). Factors that impact African American college students’ educational pursuits and career aspirations in science. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Georgia. Google Scholar
  15. Bryan, R., Glynn, S., & Kittleson, J. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95, 1049–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler-Kahle, J. (1982). Can positive minority attitudes lead to achievement gains in science? Analysis of the 1977 National Assessment of Educational Progress toward science. Science Education, 66(4), 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Butler-Kahle, J., & Lakes, M. (2003). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(supplement), 58–67.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, J., Hombo, C., & Mazzeo, J. (2000). NAEP 1999 Trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2(4), 31–36.Google Scholar
  19. Cavas, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  20. Cummins, J. (2001). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 656–675.Google Scholar
  21. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., Iver, D. M., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students’ motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 553–574.Google Scholar
  22. Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., & Rotella, S. C. (1999). Antecedent factors differentiating women and men in science/nonscience careers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(4), 763–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gainor, K., & Lent, R. (1998). Social cognitive expectations and racial identity attitudes in predicting the math choice intentions of Black college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 729–739.Google Scholar
  28. Grolnick, W., Farkas, M., Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after school program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guvercin, O., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’ motivation towards science learning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 233–243.Google Scholar
  30. Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K., & Elliott, A. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are the adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, G., Atwater, M., & Wiggins, J. (1995). Attitudes towards science of urban seventh grade life science students over time and the relationship to future plans, family, teachers curriculum, and school. Urban Education, 30(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, G., Howes, A., & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes towards science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lavigne, G., Vallerand, R., & Miquelon, P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in science education: A self-determination theory approach. European Journal of psychology of Education, 22(3), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, M., & Madyun, N. I. (2009). The impact of neighborhood disadvantage on the Black–White achievement gap. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14(2), 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth‐grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lei, S. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Evaluating benefits and drawbacks from college instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 153–160.Google Scholar
  37. Liu, M., Horton, L., Olmanson, J., & Toprac, P. (2011). A study of learning and motivation in a new media enriched environment for middle school science. Educational Technology Research Development, 59, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 912–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markowitz, D. G. (2004). Evaluation of the long-term impact of a university high school summer science program on students’ interest and perceived abilities in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2011). How can we motivate high school students to study science. Science Education International, 22(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  41. Marshall, H. (1987). Motivational strategies of three fifth grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Milner, A., Templin, M., & Czerniak, C. (2010). Elementary science students’ motivation and learning strategy use: Constructivist classroom contextual factors in a Life Science laboratory and a traditional classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murphy, P., & Alexander, P. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murdock, T., Anderman, L., & Hodge, S. (2000). Middle-grade predictors of students’ motivation and behavior in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Research Council (Ed.). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  46. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: Academy Press.Google Scholar
  47. National Science Foundation. (1994). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (pp. 94–333).Google Scholar
  48. National Science Foundation. (2000). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000. Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
  49. Nauta, M., Epperson, D., & Kahn, J. (1998). A multiple-groups analysis of predictors of higher level career aspirations among women in mathematics, science, and engineering majors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson, R. M., & DeBacker, T. K. (2008). Achievement motivation in adolescents: The role of peer climate and best friends. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(2), 170–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nolen, S. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norman, O., Ault, C. R., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black-white “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101–1114.Google Scholar
  54. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Oakes, J. (1990a). Lost talent: The underparticipation of women, minorities, and disabled students in science. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  56. Oakes, J. (1990b). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  57. Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist- informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pickens, M., & Eick, C. J. (2009). Studying motivational strategies used by two teachers in differently tracked science courses. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Powell, L. (1990). Factors associated with underrepresentation of African Americans in mathematics and science. Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rodriguez, A. (1997). Counting the runners who don’t have shoes: Trends in student achievement in science by socioeconomic status and gender within ethnic groups. National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin-Madison, Research monograph 3, National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Ruby, A. (2006). Improving science achievement at high-poverty urban middle schools. Science Education, 90(6), 1005–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Russell, M. L. (2005). Untapped talent and unlimited potential: African American students and the science pipeline. The Negro Educational Review, 56(2), 167–182.Google Scholar
  65. Simms, K. (2012). Is the Black-White achievement gap a public sector effect? An examination of student achievement in the third grade. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 17(1), 23–29.Google Scholar
  66. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sorge, C. (2007). What happens? Relationship of age and gender with science attitudes from elementary to middle school. Science Educator, 16(2), 33–37.Google Scholar
  68. Tauer, J., & Harackiewicz, J. (2004). The effects of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 849–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, G. (1986). Cultivating the interest of women and minorities in high school mathematics and science. Science Education, 70(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weinberg, A. E., Basile, C. G., & Albright, L. (2011). The effect of an experiential learning program on middle school students’ motivation toward mathematics and science. Research in Middle School Education Online, 35(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  71. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970–1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2007). Motivational interventions that work: Themes and remaining issues. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wigfield, A., & Wentzel, K. R. (2007). Introduction to motivation at school: Interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2012). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 12, 1–23. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and Teaching, College of EducationAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations