The Systematic Misuse of Science

  • André M. Green


This chapter provides information useful for effectively confronting the negative stereotypes within the halls of higher education that distribute assertions of inadequacy and also declarations of entitlement. The ultimate goal is to shed light on this climate, the infrastructure that currently exists, and to ultimately show that this infrastructure is a major contributor to the lack of participation by African Americans in scientific fields. This chapter traces historically the idea of perceived racial inferiority in regard to African Americans and how that label has inhibited the full participation or inclusion of African Americans in science and other human endeavors. This chapter focuses on the historical and political underpinnings of the misuse of science and how that misuse has influenced modern conceptions of African Americans, specifically, the discriminatory ideologies that framed science in regard to African Americans, the conceptions that resulted from these foundational ideologies, and the subtleties embedded within the present infrastructure of society that are the residuals of these ideologies.


Brain Size African American Student African Descent Science Teacher Educator Skull Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061. Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061. Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Project 2061. Blueprints for reform in science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  5. Apple, M. W. (1986). Ideology and curriculum (2nd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Atwater, M., Wiggins, J., & Gardner, C. (1995). A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes towards science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bierstede, R. (1981). American sociological theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brigham, C. (1923). A study of American intelligence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buffon, G. L. L. (1797). Barr’s Buffon: Buffon’s natural history-Containing a theory of the earth, a general history of man, of the brute creation, and of vegetables, minerals, etc. (J. S. Barr, Trans). London: H. D. Symonds.Google Scholar
  10. Dennis, R. M. (1995). Social Darwinism, scientific racism, and the metaphysics of race. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Entman, R. (1994). Representation and reality in the portrayal of blacks in network television news. Journalism Quarterly, 71(3), 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin, A., & Franklin, N. (2000). Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African American males. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry Incorporating, 70(1), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glasson, G., & Bentley, M. (1999). Epistemological undercurrents in scientists’ reporting of research to teachers. Science Education, 84, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gobineau, A. (1915). The inequality of human race, Vol. I (A. Collins, Trans.). New York: G. P. Putnam’s Son’s. (Original work published 1853)Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, E. T., Gordon, E. W., & Nembhard, J. G. (1994). Social science literature concerning African American men. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 508–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grant, N. (1992). “Scientific” racism: What price objectivity. Scottish Educational Review, 24(1), 24–31.Google Scholar
  17. Greene, J. C. (1963). Imperialism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  18. Harrell, S. P. (2000). A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: implications for the well-being of people of color. American Journal of Orthopsychiatric Incorporating, 70(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hines, M. (2002). A science educator, a sociologist, a historian, and a social studies educator on race in US history. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 5(1), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, R. C. (1992). Providing African American students access to science and mathematics (Research report #2). Cleveland, OH: Urban Child Research Center. Google Scholar
  22. Jorgensen, C. (1995). The African American critique of white supremacist science. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kardiner, A., & Ovessey, L. (1951). The mark of oppression: A psychosocial study of the American Negro. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Leary, W. E. (1996, October 24). Discrimination may affect risk of high blood pressure in blacks. New York Times, p. A20.Google Scholar
  25. Lederman, N. G., Khalick, F. A., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Towards valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis, B. (2003). The under-representation of African Americans in science: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  27. Lichter, S. R., Lichter, L. S., Rothman, S., & Amundson, D. (1987, July/August). Prime-time prejudice: TV’s images of Blacks and Hispanics. Public Opinion, pp. 13–16.Google Scholar
  28. Montagu, A. (1965). The idea of race. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  29. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. National Science Foundation. (2004a). Division of Science Resources Statistics, special tabulations of U.S. Department of education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, Completions Survey, 1997–2001.Google Scholar
  31. National Science Foundation. (2004b). An emerging and critical problem of the science and engineering labor force: A companion to science and engineering indicators. www.nsf.goi>/she/srs/nsb04O7/start.htm. Last accessed Apr 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Norman, O. (1998). Marginalized discourses and scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Education, 35(4), 365–374.Google Scholar
  33. Oakes, J. (1982). The ruling race. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  34. Oakes, J. (1990a). Lost talent: The underparticipation of women, minorities, and disabled students in science. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. Oakes, J. (1990b). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. Perkinson, H. J. (1991). The imperfect panacea: American faith in education 1865–1990 (3rd ed., pp. 40–61). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Popper, K. R. (1992). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  38. Power, J. G., Murphy, S. T., & Coover, G. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among in-groups and out-groups. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, M. L., & Atwater, M. M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schiebinger, L. (1989). The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Smyth, F., & McArdle, J. (2002). Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice. Paper presented at the 2002 American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  42. Spencer, H. (1874). The study of sociology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  43. Stanfield, J. H. (1995). The myth of race and the human sciences. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steppan, N. L., & Gilman, S. L. (1993). Appropriating the idioms of science: The rejection of scientific racism. In S. Harding (Ed.), The racial economy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Synder, L. L. (1962). The idea of racialism. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  46. Tatum, B. D. (1997). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? Basic Books. (1944). The life and selected writings of Thomas Jefferson (p. 262). New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, J. H. (1984). Oppression: A socio-history of black-white relations in America. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Vera, H., & Feagin, J. R. (1995). Superior intellect?: Sincere fictions of the white self. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiss, T. (2009). The 10 hardest jobs to fill in America. Last accessed Apr 2011.
  50. Yeakey, C. C., & Bennett, C. T. (1990). Race, schooling, and class in American society. Journal of Negro Education, 59(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeakey, C. C., & Johnston, G. S. (1979). A review essay. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(2), 353–359.Google Scholar
  52. Zappardino, P. (1995). Science, intelligence, and educational policy: The mismeasure of Frankenstein. Presented at the AERA/NCME Annual Conference, 2–10. CA: San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA

Personalised recommendations