Advertisement

Policy Issues in Science Education: The Importance of Science Teacher Education, Equity, and Social Justice

  • Sheneka M. Williams
  • Mary M. Atwater
Chapter

Abstract

Science teacher educators face more pressure to bridge the gap between preservice science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and students’ learning outcomes with the increase in diversity among middle and high school student populations. The purpose of this chapter is to review science teacher education policy in conjunction with standards to which teachers teach. Moreover, this chapter sets forth a new policy agenda to improve science teacher practices and science performance among low-income rural and urban students of color by redefining the policy problem in science teacher education.

Keywords

Science Teacher Social Justice Prospective Teacher Policy Agenda Science Teacher Educator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1066). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Association for Science Teacher Education. (2004). Position statement science teacher preparation and career-long development. Retrieved September 05, 2011 from http://theaste.org/aboutus/AETSPosnStatemt1.htm
  4. Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. (1997). Position statement: Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. Retrieved September 05, 2011 from http://www.umd.umich.edu/casl/natsci/faculty/zitzewitz/curie/TeacherPrep/178.pdf
  5. Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into multicultural science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atwater, M. M., & Suriel, R. L. (2010). Science curricular materials through the lens of social justice: Research findings. In T. K. Chapman & N. Hobbel (Eds.), Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum: The practice of freedom (pp. 273–282). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Barton, A. C., Ermer, J. L., Burkett, T. A., & Osborne, M. D. (2003). Teaching for social justice. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  8. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2006). Racism with racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Bryan, L. A., & Atwater, M. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86(6), 821–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2011). Teacher Education for Diversity: Policy and politics. In A. F. Ball & C.A. Tyson (Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education (339–362). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, B. S., Fusarelli, L. D., & Randall, E. V. (2004). Better schools, better policies. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, R. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleishman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., & Shelley, B. E. (2010). Highlights form PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED513640.pdf.
  15. Gess- Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Julyan, C., & Duckworth, E. (1996). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning science. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 55–72). New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  18. Lederman, N. G., Ramey-Gassert, L., Kuerbis, P., Loving, C., Roychoudhuray, A., & Spector, B. S. (1997). Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. AETS Newsletter, 31(3), 5–10.Google Scholar
  19. Linn, R. L., & Harnish, D. (1981). Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(2), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1043–1066). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Milner, H. R. (2010). Start where you are but don’t stay there. Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  22. Milner, H. R., & Williams, S. M. (2008). Analyzing education policy and reform with attention to race and socio-economic status. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, 14(2), 33–50.Google Scholar
  23. National Academy of Science. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Retrieved September 6, 2011 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?recored_id=1365
  24. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards (National Committee for Science Education Standards and Assessment). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  25. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  26. National Science Teacher Education. (2003). Standards for science teacher education. Retrieved September 05, 2011 from http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2
  27. Norman, O., Ault, C. R., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The Black-White “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parsons, E. C. (2003). Culturalizing instruction: Creating a more inclusive context for learning for African American students. The High School Journal, 86(4), 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parsons, E. C. (2005). From caring as a relation to culturally relevant caring: A White Teacher’s bridge to Black students. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(1), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodriguez, A. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1981). Effective policy implementation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  33. Scheurich, J. J., & Young, M. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seiler, G., & Elmesky, R. (2005). The who, what, where, and how of our urban ethnographic researcher. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, & researchers (pp. 1–20). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson, N., Wilder, M., & Atwater, M. M. (2001). Critical multiculturalism and secondary teacher education programs. In D. Lavoie (Ed.), Models for science teacher preparation: Bridging the gap between research and practice (pp. 195–211). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  37. Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. VandenBos, G. R., Appelbaum, M., Comas-Diaz, L., Cooper, H., Light, L., Ornstein, P., et al. (2010). Publication manual of the American psychological association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power. The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  40. Yager, R. E. (2000). A vision of what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Lifelong Education, Administration, and Policy, College of EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Science Education, College of EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations