Abstract
The CODAM model was introduced as a model of conscious experience in 1999/2000 (Taylor JG. Race for consciousness. Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA, 1999; ibid 2000) and developed subsequently over that decade in a series of papers (see references and those in Taylor (Scholarpedia 2(11):1598, 2007)) with applications to various well-studied experimental paradigms on attention (Taylor JG, Rogers M. Neural Netw 15:309–326, 2002; Taylor JG, Fragopanagos N. Simulations of attention control models in sensory and motor paradigms. In: Wunsch II DC, Hasselmo M, Venayagamoorthy, Wang D (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural networks (ICANN2003), pp 298–303, IEEE Press, Los Angeles, 2003; Fragopanagos N, Kockelkoren S, Taylor JG. Cogn Brain Res 24:568–586, 2005; Korsten N, Fragopanagos N, Hartley M, Taylor N, Taylor JG. Neural Netw 19(9):1408–1421, 2006; Fragopanagos N, Taylor JG. Neural Netw 20(9):993–1003, Neural Netw Special Issue on Brain and Attention (to appear), 2007); it was also applied to explain a range of meditation and related experiences (Taylor JG. Trends Cogn Sci 6(5):206–210, 2002a; Taylor JG. J Consciousness Stud 6:3–22, 2002b). Most recently it has been developed in more detail in terms of underpinning neuro-modulators (in particular dopamine and acetylcholine) for explaining the experiences of schizophrenics across the four main symptoms of prodromal, positive, negative and disordered (Taylor JG. Schizophr Bull (in press), 2010), as we will discuss in Chap. 10. We have already discussed aspects of CODAM, from its basis in the nature of attention control (in Chaps. 5 and 6) to its ability to provide an experience of ‘ownership’ to the subject (in Chap. 7), although the question of the evidence for that ownership was questioned (in Chap. 8). However the basic problem of CODAM over the last decade has been lack of clear experimental evidence for the existence of the basic corollary discharge of attention movement on which the CODAM model was founded. Some initial evidence was claimed from EEG results with the attentional blink (Sergent C, Baillet S, Dehaene S. Nat Neurosci 8:1391–1400, 2005), but that was only the first sighting and needs further data to be able to support the thesis that the corollary discharge of attention movement does exist. The further details of its dynamics is only then to be determined in detail, possibly in combination with an underlying more detailed model of such a corollary discharge as can be supported by more detailed investigations of attention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berman RA, Heiser LM, Dunn CA, Saunders RC, Colby CL (2007) Dynamic circuitry for updating spatial representations. III. From neurons to behavior. J Neurophysiol 98(1):105–121
Bressler SL, Tang W, Sylvester CM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M (2008) Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention. J Neurosci 28(40):10056–10061
Cavanagh P, Hunt AR, Afraz A, Rolfs M (2010) Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends Cogn Sci 14(4):147–153
Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman G (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58:306–324
Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modelling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423–431
Fragopanagos N, Taylor JG (2007) Resolving some confusions over attention and consciousness. Neural Netw 20(9):993–1003, Special Issue on Brain and Attention (to appear)
Fragopanagos N, Kockelkoren S, Taylor JG (2005) A neurodynamic model of the attentional blink. Cogn Brain Res 24:568–586
Gregoriou GG, Gotts SJ, Zhou H, Desimone R (2009) High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science 324:1207–1210
Hickey C, DiLollo V, McDonald JJ (2009) Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. J Cogn Neurosci 21(4):760–775
Hillmire MR, Mounts JRW, Parks NA, Corballis PM (2010) Event related potentials differentiate effects of salience and space in biased competition for visual representation. PLoS One 5(9):e12677. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012677
Hopf J-M, Luck SJ, Girelloi M, Tillman H, Mangun GR, Scheich H, Heinze H-J (2000) Neural sources of focussed attention in visual search. Cereb Cortex 10:1233–1241
Hopf J-M, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld AM, Heinze H-J, Luck SJ (2002a) How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision? Evidence from magnetoencephalography recordings. Cogn Brain Res 15:17–29
Hopf J-M, Vogel EK, Woodman G, Heinze HJ, Luck SJ (2002b) Localizing discrimination processes in time and space. J Neurophysiol 88:2088–2095
Hopf J-M, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld MA, Luck SJ, Heinze H-J (2004) Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic responses in humans. J Neurosci 24(8):1822–1832
Kiss M, Van Velzen J, Eimer M (2008) The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. Psychophysiology 45:240–249
Korsten N, Fragopanagos N, Hartley M, Taylor N, Taylor JG (2006) Attention as a controller. Neural Netw 19(9):1408–1421
Luck SJ, Hillyard SA (1994a) Spatial filtering during visual search. Evidence from human electrophysiology. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:1000–1014
Luck SJ, Hillyard SA (1994b) Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 31:291–308
Mehta AD, Ulbert I, Schroeder CE (2000) Intermodal attentional selection in monkeys I: distribution and timing of effects across visual areas. Cereb Cortex 10(343):358
Munneke J, Van der Stigchel S, Theeuwes J (2008) Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention? Acta Psychol (Amst) 129:101–107
Rizolatti G, Craighero L (2010) The premotor theory of attention. Scholarpedia 5(1):6311
Robitaille N, Jolicoeur P (2006) Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking. Can J Exp Psychol 60(2):101–111
Robitaille N, Grimault S, Jolicoeur P (2009) Bilateral parietal and contralateral responses during maintenance of unilaterally-encoded objects in visual short-term memory: evidence from magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology 46:1090–1099
Sass LA, Parnas J (2003) Schizophrenia, consciousness and the self. Schizophr Bull 29(3):427–444
Schenkluhn B, Ruff CC, Reinen K, Chambers CD (2008) Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention. J Neurosci 28(44):11106–11110
Sergent C, Baillet S, Dehaene S (2005) Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat Neurosci 8:1391–1400
Sokolowski R (2000) Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sridharan D, Levitin DJ, Chafe CH, Berger J, Menon V (2007) Neural dynamics of event segmentation in music: converging evidence for dissociable ventral and dorsal networks. Neuron 55:521–532
Taylor JG (1999) Race for consciousness. Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA
Taylor JG (2000) Attentional movement: the control basis for consciousness. Soc Neurosci Abstr 26, 2231#839.3
Taylor JG (2002a) Paying attention to consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 6(5):206–210
Taylor JG (2002b) From matter to mind. J Consciousness Stud 6:3–22
Taylor JG (2007) CODAM: a model of attention leading to the creation of consciousness. Scholarpedia 2(11):1598
Taylor JG (2011) A neural model of the loss of self in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 37(6):1229–1247
Taylor JG, Fragopanagos N (2003) Simulations of attention control models in sensory and motor paradigms. In: Wunsch II DC, Hasselmo M, Venayagamoorthy K, Wang D (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural networks (ICANN 2003). IEEE Press, Los Angeles, pp 298–303
Taylor JG, Rogers M (2002) A control model of the movement of attention. Neural Netw 15:309–326
Van der Stigchel S, Heslenfeld DJ, Theeuwes J (2006) An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task. Brain Res 1105:32–45
Vogel EK, Machizawa MG (2004) Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 458:748–751
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3:1212–1217
Wurtz RH, Sommer MA (2004) Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate brain. Prog Brain Res 144:47–60
Zahavi D (2005) Subjectivity & selfhood. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dr N Fragopanagos for discussions and simulations across a range of attention paradigms, and Drs Hopf, Sergent, Robitaille & Jolicoeur and Stigchel for granting permission to use their data. The helpful comments from three reviewers are gratefully acknowledged, as is partial financial support from the EU under the DARWIN Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, J.G. (2013). Does the Corollary Discharger of Attention Exist?. In: Solving the Mind-Body Problem by the CODAM Neural Model of Consciousness?. Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7645-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7645-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7644-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7645-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)