Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems ((SSCNS,volume 9))

  • 1073 Accesses

Abstract

The CODAM model was introduced as a model of conscious experience in 1999/2000 (Taylor JG. Race for consciousness. Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA, 1999; ibid 2000) and developed subsequently over that decade in a series of papers (see references and those in Taylor (Scholarpedia 2(11):1598, 2007)) with applications to various well-studied experimental paradigms on attention (Taylor JG, Rogers M. Neural Netw 15:309–326, 2002; Taylor JG, Fragopanagos N. Simulations of attention control models in sensory and motor paradigms. In: Wunsch II DC, Hasselmo M, Venayagamoorthy, Wang D (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural networks (ICANN2003), pp 298–303, IEEE Press, Los Angeles, 2003; Fragopanagos N, Kockelkoren S, Taylor JG. Cogn Brain Res 24:568–586, 2005; Korsten N, Fragopanagos N, Hartley M, Taylor N, Taylor JG. Neural Netw 19(9):1408–1421, 2006; Fragopanagos N, Taylor JG. Neural Netw 20(9):993–1003, Neural Netw Special Issue on Brain and Attention (to appear), 2007); it was also applied to explain a range of meditation and related experiences (Taylor JG. Trends Cogn Sci 6(5):206–210, 2002a; Taylor JG. J Consciousness Stud 6:3–22, 2002b). Most recently it has been developed in more detail in terms of underpinning neuro-modulators (in particular dopamine and acetylcholine) for explaining the experiences of schizophrenics across the four main symptoms of prodromal, positive, negative and disordered (Taylor JG. Schizophr Bull (in press), 2010), as we will discuss in Chap. 10. We have already discussed aspects of CODAM, from its basis in the nature of attention control (in Chaps. 5 and 6) to its ability to provide an experience of ‘ownership’ to the subject (in Chap. 7), although the question of the evidence for that ownership was questioned (in Chap. 8). However the basic problem of CODAM over the last decade has been lack of clear experimental evidence for the existence of the basic corollary discharge of attention movement on which the CODAM model was founded. Some initial evidence was claimed from EEG results with the attentional blink (Sergent C, Baillet S, Dehaene S. Nat Neurosci 8:1391–1400, 2005), but that was only the first sighting and needs further data to be able to support the thesis that the corollary discharge of attention movement does exist. The further details of its dynamics is only then to be determined in detail, possibly in combination with an underlying more detailed model of such a corollary discharge as can be supported by more detailed investigations of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berman RA, Heiser LM, Dunn CA, Saunders RC, Colby CL (2007) Dynamic circuitry for updating spatial representations. III. From neurons to behavior. J Neurophysiol 98(1):105–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler SL, Tang W, Sylvester CM, Shulman GL, Corbetta M (2008) Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention. J Neurosci 28(40):10056–10061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh P, Hunt AR, Afraz A, Rolfs M (2010) Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends Cogn Sci 14(4):147–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman G (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58:306–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modelling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fragopanagos N, Taylor JG (2007) Resolving some confusions over attention and consciousness. Neural Netw 20(9):993–1003, Special Issue on Brain and Attention (to appear)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fragopanagos N, Kockelkoren S, Taylor JG (2005) A neurodynamic model of the attentional blink. Cogn Brain Res 24:568–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou GG, Gotts SJ, Zhou H, Desimone R (2009) High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science 324:1207–1210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey C, DiLollo V, McDonald JJ (2009) Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. J Cogn Neurosci 21(4):760–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillmire MR, Mounts JRW, Parks NA, Corballis PM (2010) Event related potentials differentiate effects of salience and space in biased competition for visual representation. PLoS One 5(9):e12677. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf J-M, Luck SJ, Girelloi M, Tillman H, Mangun GR, Scheich H, Heinze H-J (2000) Neural sources of focussed attention in visual search. Cereb Cortex 10:1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf J-M, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld AM, Heinze H-J, Luck SJ (2002a) How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision? Evidence from magnetoencephalography recordings. Cogn Brain Res 15:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf J-M, Vogel EK, Woodman G, Heinze HJ, Luck SJ (2002b) Localizing discrimination processes in time and space. J Neurophysiol 88:2088–2095

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf J-M, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld MA, Luck SJ, Heinze H-J (2004) Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic responses in humans. J Neurosci 24(8):1822–1832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss M, Van Velzen J, Eimer M (2008) The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. Psychophysiology 45:240–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korsten N, Fragopanagos N, Hartley M, Taylor N, Taylor JG (2006) Attention as a controller. Neural Netw 19(9):1408–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Hillyard SA (1994a) Spatial filtering during visual search. Evidence from human electrophysiology. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:1000–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Hillyard SA (1994b) Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 31:291–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta AD, Ulbert I, Schroeder CE (2000) Intermodal attentional selection in monkeys I: distribution and timing of effects across visual areas. Cereb Cortex 10(343):358

    Google Scholar 

  • Munneke J, Van der Stigchel S, Theeuwes J (2008) Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention? Acta Psychol (Amst) 129:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizolatti G, Craighero L (2010) The premotor theory of attention. Scholarpedia 5(1):6311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille N, Jolicoeur P (2006) Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking. Can J Exp Psychol 60(2):101–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille N, Grimault S, Jolicoeur P (2009) Bilateral parietal and contralateral responses during maintenance of unilaterally-encoded objects in visual short-term memory: evidence from magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology 46:1090–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sass LA, Parnas J (2003) Schizophrenia, consciousness and the self. Schizophr Bull 29(3):427–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkluhn B, Ruff CC, Reinen K, Chambers CD (2008) Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention. J Neurosci 28(44):11106–11110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent C, Baillet S, Dehaene S (2005) Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat Neurosci 8:1391–1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski R (2000) Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridharan D, Levitin DJ, Chafe CH, Berger J, Menon V (2007) Neural dynamics of event segmentation in music: converging evidence for dissociable ventral and dorsal networks. Neuron 55:521–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (1999) Race for consciousness. Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (2000) Attentional movement: the control basis for consciousness. Soc Neurosci Abstr 26, 2231#839.3

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (2002a) Paying attention to consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 6(5):206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (2002b) From matter to mind. J Consciousness Stud 6:3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (2007) CODAM: a model of attention leading to the creation of consciousness. Scholarpedia 2(11):1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (2011) A neural model of the loss of self in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 37(6):1229–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG, Fragopanagos N (2003) Simulations of attention control models in sensory and motor paradigms. In: Wunsch II DC, Hasselmo M, Venayagamoorthy K, Wang D (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural networks (ICANN 2003). IEEE Press, Los Angeles, pp 298–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG, Rogers M (2002) A control model of the movement of attention. Neural Netw 15:309–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stigchel S, Heslenfeld DJ, Theeuwes J (2006) An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task. Brain Res 1105:32–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel EK, Machizawa MG (2004) Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 458:748–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3:1212–1217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz RH, Sommer MA (2004) Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate brain. Prog Brain Res 144:47–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi D (2005) Subjectivity & selfhood. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr N Fragopanagos for discussions and simulations across a range of attention paradigms, and Drs Hopf, Sergent, Robitaille & Jolicoeur and Stigchel for granting permission to use their data. The helpful comments from three reviewers are gratefully acknowledged, as is partial financial support from the EU under the DARWIN Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.G. (2013). Does the Corollary Discharger of Attention Exist?. In: Solving the Mind-Body Problem by the CODAM Neural Model of Consciousness?. Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7645-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics